首页> 外文学位 >Fine-Grained Soil Liquefaction Effects in Christchurch, New Zealand
【24h】

Fine-Grained Soil Liquefaction Effects in Christchurch, New Zealand

机译:新西兰克赖斯特彻奇的细粒土壤液化作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Liquefaction damage from the 2010-2011 Canterbury earthquake sequence devastated parts of Christchurch, New Zealand. There were many sites where state-of-practice liquefaction assessment procedures indicated liquefaction would be expected to occur, and surface manifestations of liquefaction were observed. However, there were also numerous sites, which were predominantly silty soil sites, where state-of-practice liquefaction assessment procedures indicated that liquefaction would be expected to occur, but no surface manifestations of liquefaction were observed. This discrepancy between state-of-practice liquefaction assessments and post-earthquake liquefaction observations led to the development of the research program presented in this dissertation. Several silty soil sites were selected for investigation to further our understanding of fine-grained soil liquefaction response and to evaluate potential limitations in the current state-of-practice liquefaction assessment procedures, which are based primarily on case histories and laboratory testing of sands. This dissertation investigates the liquefaction response of silty soil sites through no-liquefaction case histories from the Canterbury earthquake sequence, evaluating depositional environment effects on observed liquefaction performance, site characterization of silty soil deposits, and laboratory testing to characterize element-scale cyclic response.;Depositional environment effects are evaluated through regional CPT-based analyses and site-specific comparisons. Stratified silty soil swamp deposits are shown to have mitigating effects on the manifestation of liquefaction beyond what can be captured by simplified liquefaction assessment procedures in Christchurch. Differing surficial geology and depositional environments are found through examining historical documents to explain in part the limitations of current liquefaction assessment procedures in the swamps of southwest Christchurch, which contain stratified silt/sand deposits or thick silt layers. Consideration of depositional environment distinguishes between liquefaction performances that could not be differentiated through the CPT-based assessment alone. CPT resolution is not sufficient to capture the thin layering at these stratified sites, and the simplified liquefaction assessment methods do not take into account the effects of the stratification on pore water pressure movement within a soil profile. Continuous sampling and careful logging of high-quality samples provides important insights on in-situ stratification at these silty soil swamp sites, discerning differences in stratigraphy resulting from differences in depositional environment.;Site investigation techniques are evaluated at the silty soil case history sites to discern their capability to characterize thin layers and groundwater table fluctuation, two potential causes for the discrepancies between state-of-practice liquefaction assessments and post-earthquake liquefaction observations. CPT, mini-CPT, sonic borings, and high-quality sampling are critiqued in terms of their ability to capture thin layer stratigraphy, which is of importance for liquefaction assessment. Piezometers, sonic borings, high-quality sampling, crosshole testing, and regional groundwater maps are evaluated to assess their ability to capture groundwater table fluctuation. CPT, mini-CPT, and conventional sonic borings offer important information for site characterization, but they do not capture full details of thin layering at silty soil sites. Detailed logging of high-quality samples captures the actual in-situ layering that helps explain limitations of simplified liquefaction assessment procedures. Use of multiple groundwater measurement methods more fully illuminate fluctuating groundwater conditions. Subsurface investigation programs should utilize tools that characterize features impacting liquefaction potential in adequate detail for the intended engineering purpose. Use of multiple, complementary investigation techniques provides the most robust assessment.;A field investigation and advanced laboratory testing program was conducted in Christchurch. High-quality samples were obtained using a Dames & Moore hydraulic fixed-piston thin-walled sampler for cyclic triaxial testing to characterize the liquefaction response of silty soils at the no-liquefaction sites in southwest Christchurch. These natural silty soil specimens contained heterogeneity and variability that should be considered and is difficult, if not impossible, to replicated with laboratory-prepared specimens. Test results for stress-strain response and axial strain accumulation indicate a nuanced range of transitional responses for these intermediate soils. Post-liquefaction reconsolidation testing shows clear differences in specimen response, ranging from "sand-like" immediate reconsolidation to time-dependent reconsolidation. Simplified liquefaction assessment procedures estimate significant liquefaction at these case history sites and yet no liquefaction manifestations were observed during the Canterbury earthquake sequence. Laboratory estimates of cyclic resistance (CRR) are consistent with estimates from the simplified procedures, and both estimates of CRR are well below simplified procedure estimates of seismic demand (CSR). Depositional characteristics such as thin-layering of fine sand and silt may be why manifestations of liquefaction were not observed at these sites. Post-liquefaction reconsolidation testing provides insight that water and ejecta may not accumulate in these stratified silty soils as they would accumulate in thick deposits of liquefiable clean sands. Additional mitigating factors may also contribute to the discrepancy between simplified procedure estimates of liquefaction and the lack of liquefaction observed at these sites. The interaction of several factors contributing to observed liquefaction response at these silty soil sites indicates that in-situ "system" response should be considered and that further research on silty soils is warranted.
机译:2010年至2011年坎特伯雷地震序列的液化损害严重破坏了新西兰克赖斯特彻奇的部分地区。在许多场所,实践状态液化评估程序表明预期会发生液化,并且观察到液化的表面表现。但是,也有许多场所,主要是粉质土壤场所,实践状态的液化评估程序表明预计会发生液化,但未观察到液化的表面表现。实践状态的液化评估与地震后的液化观测之间的差异导致了本文提出的研究计划的发展。选择了几个粉质土壤场地进行调查,以进一步了解细粒土壤液化反应,并评估当前实践状态液化评估程序中的潜在局限性,这些评估程序主要基于案例历史和沙子的实验室测试。本文通过坎特伯雷地震序列的非液化案例历史研究了粉质土壤场地的液化响应,评估了沉积环境对观测到的液化性能的影响,粉质土壤沉积物的现场表征,以及通过实验室测试来表征元素尺度的循环响应。通过基于区域CPT的分析和特定地点的比较来评估沉积环境影响。研究表明,分层的粉质土壤沼泽沉积物对液化的表现具有缓解作用,超出了克赖斯特彻奇简化液化评估程序所能捕获的范围。通过检查历史文献发现不同的表层地质和沉积环境,以部分解释目前在基督城西南部沼泽中的液化评估程序的局限性,该程序包含分层的粉砂/砂矿或厚粉砂层。沉积环境的考虑区分了液化性能,而液化性能不能仅通过基于CPT的评估来区分。 CPT分辨率不足以捕获这些分层位置处的薄层,并且简化的液化评估方法没有考虑分层对土壤剖面内孔隙水压力运动的影响。连续采样和仔细记录高质量样品可为这些粉质土壤沼泽地层的原位分层提供重要的见解,从而发现沉积环境不同而引起的地层学差异。识别其表征薄层和地下水位波动的能力,这是实践状态液化评估与地震后液化观测之间差异的两个潜在原因。 CPT,微型CPT,声音钻孔和高质量采样在捕获薄层地层的能力方面受到批评,这对液化评估很重要。评估了压力计,声波钻孔,高质量采样,井孔测试和区域地下水图,以评估其捕获地下水位波动的能力。 CPT,小型CPT和常规声波钻孔为现场表征提供了重要信息,但它们无法捕获粉质土壤现场薄层的全部细节。高质量样品的详细记录记录了实际的原位分层,有助于解释简化的液化评估程序的局限性。使用多种地下水测量方法可以更充分地阐明波动的地下水状况。地下调查计划应利用工具,以足够详细的方式描述影响液化潜力的特征,以达到预期的工程目的。使用多种补充调查技术可提供最可靠的评估。;在基督城进行了现场调查和高级实验室测试程序。使用Dames&Moore液压固定活塞薄壁采样器获取高质量的样品进行循环三轴测试,以表征克赖斯特彻奇西南部非液化点的粉质土壤的液化响应。这些天然粉质土壤标本包含异质性和变异性,应该考虑这些异质性和变异性,即使不是不可能,也很难用实验室制备的标本复制。应力-应变响应和轴向应变累积的测试结果表明,这些中间土壤的过渡响应变化幅度很小。液化后的固结测试表明样品响应存在明显差异,范围从“类似沙子”的立即合并到时间依赖性重新合并。简化的液化评估程序可估计这些案例历史记录地点的明显液化,但在坎特伯雷地震序列中未观察到液化表现。实验室对循环阻力(CRR)的估计与简化程序的估计值一致,并且两种CRR估计值都远低于地震需求(CSR)的简化程序估计值。沉积特征,例如细砂和粉砂的薄层,可能是为什么在这些位置未观察到液化的表现。液化后的固结测试提供了洞察力,即水和喷射物可能不会积聚在这些分层的粉质土壤中,因为它们会积聚在可液化的干净沙子的厚沉积物中。其他缓解因素也可能会导致简化的液化过程估计值与在这些位置观察到的液化缺乏之间的差异。影响这些粉质土壤位点液化响应的几个因素的相互作用表明,应考虑原位“系统”响应,并且有必要对粉质土壤进行进一步研究。

著录项

  • 作者

    Beyzaei, Christine Zahra.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Berkeley.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Berkeley.;
  • 学科 Civil engineering.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2017
  • 页码 504 p.
  • 总页数 504
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号