首页> 外文学位 >The choice between focus and diversification strategies in banking and its relationship to risk and return outcomes.
【24h】

The choice between focus and diversification strategies in banking and its relationship to risk and return outcomes.

机译:银行业的重点战略和多元化战略之间的选择及其与风险和回报结果的关系。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This research examines whether the risk of financial institutions in six different focused peer groups is higher than that of banks in more diversified peer groups. It investigates whether the risk-reducing benefits of diversification outweigh the benefits of specialization. Each focused group includes banks with a large proportion of assets in a narrow industry segment such as agricultural loans, credit cards, commercial lending, mortgage lending, consumer lending and other focused loans.;This thesis differs from much of the research in this area in taking a regulator-focused approach rather than the perspective of a shareholder. Regulators differ from shareholders because they cannot diversify themselves to improve their risks. A better understanding of the relative levels of risks of different types of strategies and industry focuses could contribute to a better allocation of regulatory resources, and to more effective supervisory interventions.;This study differs from similar work in the past because it controls for the size and tax-status of the banks in the sample, and compares focused banks to a sample including only diversified banks. Other studies, in contrast, compared one focused peer group to a comparator group of all banks but for the one focused group. Thus, the comparator group included both diversified and focused banks. Further, this study includes six different focused groups of banks whereas most previous studies considered only one focused group. This study also considers banks that switch between focus and diversification strategies as a distinct class of banks and is therefore unique in this regard.;The data in this study confirm the major hypothesis that banks following a diversified strategy are less risky than banks following an industry-focused approach. It provides limited support for the hypothesis that diversified banks will generate lower returns on assets than focused banks, although this finding seems to be size-dependent and to apply only to certain focused groups. The third major hypothesis, that diversified banks will have lower standard deviations of returns on assets, is also supported. The results for the hypothesis that diversified banks will hold less capital relative to assets than focused banks, is largely contradicted.
机译:这项研究调查了六个不同的重点同peer群体中的金融机构的风险是否高于更加多元化的同groups群体中的银行的风险。它研究了多元化带来的降低风险的收益是否超过专业化带来的收益。每个焦点小组都包括在狭窄行业领域中拥有大量资产的银行,例如农业贷款,信用卡,商业贷款,抵押贷款,消费者贷款和其他焦点贷款。;本论文与该领域的许多研究有所不同采取以监管者为中心的方法,而不是股东的观点。监管者与股东之所以不同,是因为他们无法通过分散自身来提高风险。更好地了解不同类型策略和行业重点的相对风险水平可能有助于更好地分配监管资源,并有助于更有效的监管干预措施。该研究与过去的类似工作有所不同,因为它可以控制规模样本中银行的税收状况,并将重点银行与仅包括多元化银行的样本进行比较。相比之下,其他研究则将一个重点关注的同龄人小组与所有银行的比较者组进行了比较,但对一个重点关注的组进行了比较。因此,比较组包括多元化和重点银行。此外,这项研究包括六个不同的银行重点小组,而大多数先前的研究仅考虑了一个重点小组。这项研究还认为在焦点和多元化战略之间转换的银行是一类独特的银行,因此在这方面是独特的;这项研究的数据证实了主要假设,即采取多元化战略的银行比跟随一个行业的银行的风险更低重点的方法。尽管这一发现似乎与规模有关,并且仅适用于某些重点人群,但它为以下假设提供了有限的支持:多元化银行将产生比重点银行更低的资产收益。第三个主要假设是,多元化银行的资产收益率标准差较低。相对于资产集中的银行而言,相对于资产而言,分散的银行持有的资本较少这一假设的结果在很大程度上是矛盾的。

著录项

  • 作者

    Stan, Mitchell.;

  • 作者单位

    Carleton University (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 Carleton University (Canada).;
  • 学科 Business Administration Accounting.;Economics Finance.;Business Administration Banking.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 128 p.
  • 总页数 128
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 财务管理、经济核算;财政、金融;金融、银行;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号