首页> 外文学位 >A structural equation model and intervention study of individual differences, Willingness to Communicate, and L2 use in an EFL classroom.
【24h】

A structural equation model and intervention study of individual differences, Willingness to Communicate, and L2 use in an EFL classroom.

机译:一个结构方程模型和对个体差异,沟通意愿以及在EFL课堂中使用L2的干预研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this study I investigated foreign language learners' Willingness to Communicate, frequency of L2 communication, and eight individual difference variables hypothesized to influence them: L2 learning anxiety, L2 learning motivation, integrativeness, international posture, ought-to L2 self, ideal L2 self, L2 linguistic self-confidence, and valuing of global English. Based on the concept of possible selves (Markus & Nurius, 1986), Dornyei (2005) proposed the concept of the ideal L2 self: an idealized self-image involving future linguistic proficiency and professional success through mastery of an L2. In this study, Dornyei's (2005) hypothesis that Willingness to Communicate is primarily determined by linguistic self-confidence and the ideal L2 self is tested using a structural equation model. A second purpose of this study, tested by comparing alternative structural equation models, was to confirm whether students' self-reported Willingness to Communicate best predicts foreign language use in the classroom. In addition, gender differences in L2 WTC and the ideal L2 self, and the effects of visualization and goal-setting activities on the enhancement of Willingness to Communicate were investigated using multivariate statistical techniques.;A total of 662 Japanese university students participated in the study, 373 as core participants and 289 for cross validation. A model was hypothesized based on the WTC model (MacIntyre, 1994), the socioeducational model (Gardner, 1985), and the concept of the L2 Motivational Self System (Dornyei, 2005), and tested using questionnaire data collected at the beginning of the university semester. The hypothesized model showed marginal fit to the data (CFI = .902, RMSEA = .081). The path from ideal L2 self to L2 WTC, tested for the first time in this study, was the most substantial predictor of L2 WTC in the model with a path weight of .51. It was also confirmed that self-reported estimates of WTC directly predicted observed L2 use in the classroom, while Motivation and Ideal L2 Self did not. A model specifying a direct path from WTC to L2 Use and indirect paths via WTC for Motivation and Ideal L2 Self showed good fit to the data (CFI = .962; RMSEA = .083). Regarding gender differences, female participants scored higher than males in both L2 WTC and Ideal L2 Self. Concerning whether L2 WTC can be enhanced by classroom tasks such as visualization and goal-setting, the results suggested that the visualization treatment alone was not effective in enhancing learners' L2 WTC over the non-treatment group. The increase in learners' L2 WTC was significantly greater for the When visualization and goal-setting group compared with the visualization group and the non-treatment group.;The first implication of this study is that considering the strong impact of ideal L2 self on L2 WTC, there is significant potential for enhancing L2 WTC by applying motivational strategies that enhance or develop second language learners' ideal L2 self. Second, considering the importance of L2 output for developing communicative proficiency, the finding that self-reported L2 WTC predicted actual L2 use in the classroom lends additional credence to such motivational approaches. That finding also supports the validity of other studies that have relied on self-report for measures of L2 WTC. A third implication is that because females generally exhibited higher measures for L2 WTC and Ideal L2 Self, gender diversity is preferable to promote active classroom communication. Finally, for researchers and practitioners interested in designing activities to enhance learners' L2 WTC, connecting the proximal goals in the class to future distal goals (Miller & Brickman, 2004) could be an important aspect for the success of the activities.
机译:在这项研究中,我调查了外语学习者的交流意愿,第二语言交流的频率以及八个可能影响他们的个体差异变量:第二语言学习焦虑,第二语言学习动机,整合性,国际态度,应该对第二语言自我,理想的第二语言自我,L2语言自信和全球英语评估。基于可能的自我概念(Markus和Nurius,1986),Dornyei(2005)提出了理想的L2自我的概念:一种理想的自我形象,包括通过掌握L2掌握未来的语言水平和职业成功。在这项研究中,Dornyei(2005)的假设是交流意愿主要由语言自信心决定,而理想的L2自我则使用结构方程模型进行检验。本研究的第二个目的是通过比较替代的结构方程模型进行的测试,目的是确认学生的自我报告的交流意愿是否能最好地预测课堂中的外语使用情况。此外,使用多元统计技术研究了L2 WTC和理想L2自我中的性别差异以及可视化和目标设定活动对增强交流意愿的影响。;总共662名日本大学生参加了该研究,其中373人为核心参与者,而289人为交叉验证。假设模型基于WTC模型(MacIntyre,1994),社会教育模型(Gardner,1985)和L2动机自我系统的概念(Dornyei,2005),并使用在开始时收集的问卷数据进行测试。大学学期。假设的模型显示出对数据的边际拟合(CFI = .902,RMSEA = .081)。在本研究中首次测试的从理想L2自我到L2 WTC的路径是模型中L2 WTC的最重要预测指标,路径权重为.51。还证实了自我报告的WTC估计直接预测了课堂上观察到的L2使用,而动机和理想L2自我却没有。指定从WTC到L2使用的直接路径以及通过WTC进行动机和理想L2 Self的间接路径的模型显示出与数据的良好拟合(CFI = .962; RMSEA = .083)。关于性别差异,在L2 WTC和理想L2 Self中,女性参与者的得分均高于男性。关于是否可以通过诸如可视化和目标设定之类的课堂任务来增强L2 WTC,结果表明,与非治疗组相比,仅凭可视化治疗无法有效提高学习者的L2 WTC。与可视化组和非治疗组相比,When可视化和目标设定组的学习者L2 WTC的增加显着更大。该研究的第一个含义是考虑到理想的L2自我对L2的强烈影响世贸中心,通过应用激励策略来增强或发展第二语言学习者的理想二语自我,具有增强二语世界WTC的巨大潜力。其次,考虑到L2输出对于发展沟通能力的重要性,发现自我报告的L2 WTC可以预测教室中实际使用L2,这一发现为这种激励方法提供了更多的可信度。这一发现也支持了其他依靠自我报告来衡量L2 WTC的研究的有效性。第三个含义是,由于女性通常对L2 WTC和理想L2 Self表现出更高的衡量标准,因此性别多样化对于促进积极的课堂交流更为可取。最后,对于对设计活动以增强学习者的L2 WTC感兴趣的研究人员和从业人员而言,将班级中的近端目标与将来的远端目标联系起来(Miller&Brickman,2004年)可能是活动成功的重要方面。

著录项

  • 作者

    Munezane, Yoko.;

  • 作者单位

    Temple University.;

  • 授予单位 Temple University.;
  • 学科 Education Educational Psychology.;Education Language and Literature.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 325 p.
  • 总页数 325
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号