首页> 外文学位 >Analysis and Comparison of Clothoid and Dubins Algorithms for UAV Trajectory Generation.
【24h】

Analysis and Comparison of Clothoid and Dubins Algorithms for UAV Trajectory Generation.

机译:用于无人机航迹生成的类环和Dubins算法的分析和比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The differences between two types of pose-based UAV path generation methods clothoid and Dubins are analyzed in this thesis. The Dubins path is a combination of circular arcs and straight line segments; therefore its curvature will exhibit sudden jumps between constant values. The resulting path will have a minimum length if turns are performed at the minimum possible turn radius. The clothoid path consists of a similar combination of arcs and segments but the difference is that the clothoid arcs have a linearly variable curvature and are generated based on Fresnel integrals. Geometrically, the generation of the clothoid arc starts with a large curvature that decreases to zero. The clothoid path results are longer than the Dubins path between the same two poses and for the same minimum turn radius. These two algorithms are the focus of this research because of their geometrical simplicity, flexibility, and low computational requirements.;The comparison between clothoid and Dubins algorithms relies on extensive simulation results collected using an ad-hoc developed automated data acquisition tool within the WVU UAV simulation environment. The model of a small jet engine UAV has been used for this purpose. The experimental design considers several primary factors, such as different trajectory tracking control laws, normal and abnormal flight conditions, relative configuration of poses, and wind and turbulence. A total of five different controllers have been considered, three conventional with fixed parameters and two adaptive. The abnormal flight conditions include locked or damaged actuators (stabilator, aileron, or rudder) and sensor bias affecting roll, pitch, or yaw rate gyros that are used in the feedback control loop. The relative configuration of consecutive poses is considered in terms of heading (required turn angle) and relative location of start and end points (position quadrant). Wind and turbulence effects were analyzed for different wind speed and direction and several levels of turbulence severity. The evaluation and comparison of the two path generation algorithms are performed based on generated and actual path length and tracking performance assessed in terms of tracking errors and control activity.;Although continuous position and velocity are ensured, the Dubins path yields discontinuous changes in path curvature and hence in commanded lateral accelerations at the transition points between the circular arcs and straight segments. The simulation results show that this generally leads to increased trajectory tracking errors, longer actual paths, and more intense control surface activity. The gradual (linear) change in clothoid curvature yields a continuous change in commanded lateral accelerations with general positive effects on the overall UAV performance based on the metrics considered. The simulation results show general similar trends for all factors considered. As a result, it may be concluded that, due to the continuous change in commanded lateral acceleration, the clothoid path generation algorithm provides overall better performance than the Dubins algorithm, at both normal and abnormal flight conditions, if the UAV mission involves significant maneuvers requiring intense lateral acceleration commands.
机译:本文分析了两种基于姿态的无人机路径生成方法回旋和Dubins之间的差异。杜宾斯路径是圆弧和直线段的组合;因此,它的曲率会在恒定值之间出现突然的跳跃。如果以最小可能的转弯半径执行转弯,则生成的路径将具有最小长度。回旋弧路径由弧和线段的类似组合组成,但不同之处在于回旋弧具有线性可变的曲率,并基于菲涅尔积分生成。在几何上,回旋弧的生成从减小到零的大曲率开始。对于相同的两个姿势和相同的最小转弯半径,回旋路径的结果比杜宾斯路径的结果长。这两种算法由于其几何简单性,灵活性和较低的计算要求而成为本研究的重点。;回旋算法与Dubins算法之间的比较依赖于在WVU UAV中使用临时开发的自动数据采集工具收集的大量仿真结果。模拟环境。小型喷气发动机无人机的模型已用于此目的。实验设计考虑了几个主要因素,例如不同的轨迹跟踪控制律,正常和异常飞行条件,姿势的相对配置以及风和湍流。总共考虑了五个不同的控制器,三个具有固定参数的常规控制器和两个自适应控制器。异常飞行条件包括锁定或损坏的执行器(稳定器,副翼或方向舵)以及影响反馈控制回路中使用的侧倾,俯仰或偏航率陀螺仪的​​传感器偏置。根据航向(所需的转弯角度)以及起点和终点的相对位置(位置象限)来考虑连续姿势的相对配置。针对不同的风速和风向以及湍流严重性的几个级别,分析了风和湍流效应。两种路径生成算法的评估和比较是基于生成的路径长度和实际路径长度以及根据跟踪误差和控制活动评估的跟踪性能来进行的;尽管确保了连续的位置和速度,但杜宾斯路径在路径曲率方面产生了不连续的变化因此,在圆弧和直线段之间的过渡点处具有命令的横向加速度。仿真结果表明,这通常会导致轨迹跟踪误差增加,实际路径更长,控制表面活动更激烈。回旋曲率的逐渐(线性)变化会根据所考虑的指标对命令的横向加速度产生连续变化,并对总体无人机性能产生总体积极影响。仿真结果表明,考虑所有因素,总体趋势相似。结果,可以得出结论,由于指令横向加速度的连续变化,如果无人机任务涉及重大机动需求,则在正常和异常飞行条件下,回旋路径生成算法在总体性能上均优于杜宾斯算法。强烈的横向加速度指令。

著录项

  • 作者

    Al Nuaimi, Mohanad.;

  • 作者单位

    West Virginia University.;

  • 授予单位 West Virginia University.;
  • 学科 Aerospace engineering.;Engineering.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 100 p.
  • 总页数 100
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:53:45

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号