首页> 外文学位 >Predictors of Success on the Prosthetics Certification Examination.
【24h】

Predictors of Success on the Prosthetics Certification Examination.

机译:假肢认证考试成功的预测因素。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Students who graduate from a practitioner program in prosthetics & orthotics must achieve certification in order to obtain licensure and practice independently in 16 states. In states where licensure is not mandatory, graduates may choose to pursue certification in order assure patients that they are practicing at the highest level as well as to differentiate themselves from competitors. While studies have been carried out extensively regarding predictors of success on the certification exams in other professions, no such study has been carried out to date in prosthetics.;The American Board for Certification in Prosthetics, Orthotics, & Pedorthics (ABC), established in 1948, historically has been the organization whose standards states adopt when wishing to implement licensure law. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to determine if statistically significant relations exist the ABC prosthetics certification pass or fail rates as well as the 3 exams which comprise certification based on specific predictor variables: gender, Carnegie ranking of the institution from where the candidate received the degree, and whether the candidate is extending credential. As it specifically relates to this study, credential extension refers to adding the certified prosthetist (CP) credential after already possessing the certified orthotist (CO) credential.;A quantitative, retrospective, secondary data analysis of de-identified prosthetic resident data provided by the American Board for Certification in Prosthetics, Orthotics, & Pedorthics (ABC) and the National Commission on Orthotic & Prosthetic Education (NCOPE) was used to test the following research questions: Is there a relationship between gender, institution type, and/or credential extension and (1) success in achieving ABC prosthetics practitioner certification, (2) performance on the ABC prosthetics Written Multiple Choice exam, (3) performance on the ABC prosthetics Written Simulation exam, and (4) performance on the ABC Clinical Patient Management practical exam?;Chi-square analysis, independent t-tests and logistic regression were used for data analysis in question 1. In research questions 2, 3, and 4 independent t-tests were used for analysis with two-level categorical independent variables and ANOVA was used for the three-level categorical independent variable, institution type. Linear regression was used for the models in research questions 2, 3, and 4. Statistically significant relations were found in each research question between the credential extension predictor variable and the dependent variables, with candidates who were extending credential performing better on each of the three examinations and, thus, greater success obtaining certification.;This study was the first of its kind conducted regarding predictors of success in prosthetics certification, conducted with the variables of interest currently available. It served as a first step in filling the existing gap regarding this topic in the prosthetics literature. It informed the profession of the relationship between available predictors and variables of interest related to the ABC prosthetics certification exam. Further, it informed the profession of its status concerning collecting additional variables of interest that would permit analysis of more robust information, including grades on specific courses of interest, various GPAs and time between residency completion and exam date. Additionally, it informed the profession of its status concerning such research compared to other health professions with which it seeks to keep pace.;Repeating this study with additional variables and an expanded sample size could potentially produce significant results, as has occurred in other professions. Further, additional analysis following stabilization of the new Master's degree and accreditation standards is warranted. This line of research has the potential to inform practice and policy in prosthetics education and certification. Finally, it will help the prosthetics profession keep pace with the other health professions and become a leader in best educational and clinical practices in managing patients who utilize prosthetic technologies.
机译:从假肢与矫正术专业课程毕业的学生必须获得认证,才能在16个州独立获得执照和执业资格。在不是强制执照的州,毕业生可以选择进行认证,以确保患者正在以最高水平执业,并使自己与竞争对手区分开。尽管已经对其他行业的认证考试成功的预测因素进行了广泛的研究,但迄今为止,尚未在假肢术领域进行过此类研究。;美国假肢,矫形和佩德罗蒂奇认证委员会(ABC),成立于从1948年开始,历史上一直是希望实施许可法时各州采用的标准的组织。因此,本研究的目的是确定是否存在统计学上显着的关系,即是否存在ABC假肢认证合格率或不合格率,以及基于特定预测变量的包括认证在内的3项考试:性别,应聘者接收机构的卡内基排名学位,以及候选人是否正在扩展证书。由于它与本研究特别相关,所以证书扩展是指在已经拥有认证的矫正者(CO)证书之后添加认证的假肢(CP)证书。美国假肢,假肢与假肢认证委员会(ABC)和国家假肢与假肢教育委员会(NCOPE)用于测试以下研究问题:性别,机构类型和/或证书扩展之间是否存在关系(1)成功获得ABC假肢从业者认证,(2)在ABC假肢书面多项选择考试中的表现,(3)在ABC假肢书面模拟考试中的表现和(4)在ABC临床患者管理实践考试中的表现使用卡方分析,独立t检验和逻辑回归进行问题1的数据分析。在研究问题2中,3和4个独立t检验用于分析两级分类自变量,而方差分析用于三级分类自变量,机构类型。线性回归用于研究问题2、3和4中的模型。在每个研究问题中,凭据扩展预测变量和因变量之间存在统计上的显着关系,而扩展凭据的候选人在三个方面的表现均更好考试,从而获得更大的成功。;这项研究是有关假体认证成功的预测因素的同类研究中的第一项,使用当前可用的变量进行。这是填补假肢文献中有关该主题的现有空白的第一步。它向专业人士介绍了与ABC假肢认证考试相关的可用预测变量和感兴趣的变量之间的关系。此外,它告知专业人士有关收集其他感兴趣变量的状态,该变量将允许分析更可靠的信息,包括特定感兴趣课程的等级,各种GPA以及居留完成和考试日期之间的时间。此外,与其他与之保持同步的卫生专业相比,它还向该专业通报了其在此类研究中的地位。;与其他专业一样,以其他变量和扩大的​​样本量重复进行本研究可能会产生重大结果。此外,在稳定新的硕士学位和认证标准之后,还需要进行其他分析。该研究领域可能为假肢教育和认证的实践和政策提供信息。最后,它将帮助假肢专业与其他卫生专业保持同步,并成为管理使用假体技术的患者的最佳教育和临床实践的领导者。

著录项

  • 作者

    Miro, Rebecca Maria.;

  • 作者单位

    University of South Florida.;

  • 授予单位 University of South Florida.;
  • 学科 Education Higher.;Education Higher Education Administration.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 131 p.
  • 总页数 131
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号