首页> 外文学位 >Comparative and Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Chinese and Korean Court Documentary Painting in the Eighteenth Century.
【24h】

Comparative and Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Chinese and Korean Court Documentary Painting in the Eighteenth Century.

机译:18世纪中韩法院文献画的比较和跨文化视角。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation is the fruit of cross-cultural and comparative research on Chinese and Korean court documentary painting, a genre that depicted important state rituals, court ceremonies, and political events taking place within and beyond the palace complexes. In spite of the historical and artistic interconnections between these court-documentary traditions, previous scholarship has focused only on one court or the other. Thus, my study aims to identify the distinctive strands of Chinese and Korean pictorial traditions and practices in the production and consumption of court documentary paintings. It also traces intercultural exchanges of ideas, artifacts, and practices and their contributions to the development of new pictorial themes and styles.;This investigation concentrates on the reigns of the Kangxi (r. 1661-1722), Yongzheng (r. 1723-35), and Qianlong (r. 1736-95) emperors of the Qing dynasty of China and those of Kings Yeongjo (r. 1724-76) and Jeongjo (r. 1776-1800) of the Joseon kingdom of Korea. Under these eighteenth-century monarchs, both China and Korea enjoyed political stability, economic prosperity, and cultural diversity. With the strong patronage of these rulers, the courts of these early-modern East Asian states became the centers of intellectual and artistic innovation, inspired in part by imported ideas and practices and in part by the existing pictorial traditions of their respective states.;Court documentary paintings sponsored by Qing and Joseon rulers developed strikingly similar themes, including the rulers' ritual activities and outings. The shared themes in eighteenth-century court documentary paintings were far from coincidental. In addition to the increasingly frequent exchanges of diplomatic missions and material goods between China and Korea, which existed prior to the eighteenth century, a single, overarching idea contributed to the development of this pictorial genre in the eighteenth-century Qing and Joseon courts.;Literally translated as Central Florescence, Zhonghua (meaning civilization, limited to that of the Han Chinese) was the shared political vision between the Qing and Joseon ruling houses. The desire to claim possession of Zhonghua, or the center of civilization, played a pivotal role in the development of the rulers' ritual activities and outings and motivated the production of eighteenth-century Qing and Joseon court-documentary paintings that highlighted those events. Thus, eighteenth-century Qing and Joseon court documentary painting is a consummate example of an art form that flourished across borders.
机译:这篇论文是对中韩法院纪实绘画的跨文化和比较研究的成果,这一流派描绘了重要的国家仪式,宫廷典礼以及在宫殿建筑群内外发生的政治事件。尽管这些法院文献传统之间存在历史和艺术上的联系,但以前的奖学金仅集中于一个法院或另一个法院。因此,我的研究旨在确定中国和韩国绘画传统和实践在法院纪实书画的生产和消费中的独特组合。它还追踪了思想,文物和实践的跨文化交流以及它们对新的绘画主题和风格发展的贡献。;本研究集中于康熙(1661-1722年),雍正(1723-35年)的统治时期。 ),以及中国清朝的乾隆皇帝(1736-95年)和朝鲜王朝的英祖(1724-76年)和正祖(1776-1800年)的皇帝。在这18世纪的君主统治下,中国和朝鲜都享有政治稳定,经济繁荣和文化多样性。在这些统治者的大力支持下,这些早期现代东亚国家的法院成为了知识和艺术创新的中心,部分受到了各自国家现有思想和实践的启发,部分受到了各自国家现有的绘画传统的启发。由清朝和朝鲜统治者赞助的纪录片绘画发展出了极为相似的主题,包括统治者的仪式活动和郊游。 18世纪法院纪实绘画的共同主题绝非偶然。除了在18世纪之前中韩之间越来越频繁地进行外交使团和物资的交流外,一个单一的,总体的思想为18世纪的清朝和朝鲜法院这种绘画风格的发展做出了贡献。中华(字面意思是文明,仅限于汉人的文明)在字面上被翻译为“中央花开”,是清朝和朝鲜统治者之间的共同政治愿景。要求拥有中华民族或文明中心的愿望在统治者的仪式活动和郊游的发展中起着举足轻重的作用,并激发了制作强调这些事件的18世纪清朝和朝鲜宫廷纪实绘画作品。因此,十八世纪的清朝和朝鲜宫廷纪实绘画是跨境繁荣的艺术形式的完美范例。

著录项

  • 作者

    McCormick, Sooa.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Kansas.;

  • 授予单位 University of Kansas.;
  • 学科 Art history.;Asian history.;Asian studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 385 p.
  • 总页数 385
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:53:33

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号