首页> 外文学位 >Using discriminative dimensionality reduction to understand the neural basis of recognition memory encoding and retrieval.
【24h】

Using discriminative dimensionality reduction to understand the neural basis of recognition memory encoding and retrieval.

机译:使用判别降维来理解识别记忆编码和检索的神经基础。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We present results from single-trial analyses conducted on Electroencephalography (EEG) data recorded during recognition memory experiments.;Chapter 2 gives an overview on EEG analysis methods including various classification and feature extraction methods for EEG. The chapter also gives a review of previous findings on neural correlates of recognition memory.;In Chapter 3, we propose a novel way to use discriminative classification analysis to project high-dimensional EEG data onto a low-dimensional discriminative space for visualization, analysis, and statistical testing. This multivariate analysis directly controls for the multiple comparison problem (MCP) by effectively reducing the number of test variables. A major advantage of this approach is that it is possible to compare the brain activity across different conditions even when the trial count is low, provided that a sufficient number of trials are used to establish the initial hyperplane(s), meaning that error conditions and conditions that divide subtle behavioral differences can be readily compared. Currently these data are either ignored or lumped with other data thereby losing the ability to reveal the neural mechanisms underlying subtle behavioral differences. The proposed method provides a powerful tool to analyze conditions with relatively small numbers of trials from high-dimensional neural recordings.;In Chapter 4, we show that it is possible to successfully predict subsequent memory performance based on single-trial EEG activity before and during item presentation in the study phase. Two-class classification was conducted to predict subsequently remembered vs. forgotten trials based on subjects' responses in the recognition phase. The overall accuracy across 18 subjects was 59.6 % by combining pre- and during-stimulus information. The single-trial classification analysis provides a dimensionality reduction method to project the high-dimensional EEG data onto a discriminative space. These projections revealed novel findings in the pre- and during-stimulus periods related to levels of encoding. It was observed that the pre-stimulus information (specifically oscillatory activity between 25 and 35 Hz) -300 to 0 ms before stimulus presentation and during-stimulus alpha (7-12 Hz) information between 1000 and 1400 ms after stimulus onset distinguished between recollection and familiarity while the during-stimulus alpha information and temporal information between 400 and 800 ms after stimulus onset mapped these two states to similar values.;In Chapter 5, we show that it is possible to predict successfully identified old vs. new items based on single-trial EEG activity recorded during the retrieval phase of 4 separate datasets. Two-class classification was conducted on the trials with source (frame color/spatial location of the study item) correct trials with high confidence responses vs. correctly rejected trials. The average accuracy for the datasets recorded in a single session was 62.2 while the average accuracy for the datasets recorded in two separate sessions was 58.7 %. The classifier outputs revealed novel findings related to retrieval strength from the EEG data. The classifier outputs from all 4 datasets reflected whether the subjects remembered the source information and also whether the subjects believed they remembered the source information. Furthermore, the source correct trials where the subjects believed they correctly remembered the source information were recognized as the highest retrieval strength condition by the classifiers. Cross-source classification analysis showed that the frontal old/new effect was affected by source type (location vs. color) possibly due to prefrontal and parahippocampal involvement in location retrieval whereas the parietal old/new effect was source type invariant.
机译:我们介绍了在识别记忆实验期间记录的脑电图(EEG)数据上进行的单次试验分析结果。第二章概述了脑电图分析方法,包括脑电图的各种分类和特征提取方法。本章还回顾了先前关于识别记忆的神经相关性的发现。在第3章中,我们提出了一种使用判别分类分析的新方法,将高维EEG数据投影到低维判别空间上以进行可视化,分析,和统计测试。通过有效减少测试变量的数量,此多变量分析直接控制了多重比较问题(MCP)。这种方法的主要优点是,即使试验次数很少,也可以比较不同条件下的大脑活动,但前提是要使用足够的试验次数来建立初始超平面,这意味着错误条件和可以区分细微的行为差异的条件。目前,这些数据要么被忽略,要么与其他数据混为一谈,从而失去了揭示细微行为差异背后的神经机制的能力。所提出的方法提供了一个功能强大的工具,可以从高维神经记录中以相对较少的试验次数来分析条件。;在第4章中,我们表明可以基于之前和之中的单次EEG活动来成功预测后续的记忆表现研究阶段的项目介绍。根据受试者在识别阶段的反应,进行了两类分类,以预测随后被记住或被遗忘的试验。结合刺激前和刺激中的信息,18位受试者的总体准确度为59.6%。单次试验分类分析提供了降维方法,可将高维EEG数据投影到判别空间上。这些预测揭示了刺激前和刺激期间与编码水平有关的新颖发现。观察到,刺激前的信息(特别是在25和35 Hz之间的振荡活动)在刺激出现之前为-300到0 ms,在刺激发作后1000到1400 ms之间在刺激期间的alpha(7-12 Hz)信息之间有所区别。和熟悉程度,而在刺激发生后400到800毫秒之间的刺激期间alpha信息和时间信息将这两个状态映射为相似的值。在第5章中,我们表明可以基于以下信息预测成功识别的旧项目:新项目在4个独立数据集的检索阶段记录的单项EEG活动。在试验中进行了两类分类,其中来源(框架颜色/研究项目的空间位置)正确的试验具有高置信度,而正确拒绝的试验。单个会话中记录的数据集的平均准确性为62.2,而两个单独会话中记录的数据集的平均准确性为58.7%。分类器的输出揭示了与从EEG数据中检索强度有关的新颖发现。来自所有4个数据集的分类器输出反映了受试者是否记住了源信息,以及受试者是否认为他们记住了源信息。此外,分类者认为受试者认为他们正确记住了源信息的源正确试验被认为是最高检索强度条件。跨源分类分析表明,额叶旧/新效应受源类型(位置与颜色)的影响,可能是由于前额叶和海马旁参与位置检索,而顶叶旧/新效应是源类型不变。

著录项

  • 作者

    Noh, Eunho.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, San Diego.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, San Diego.;
  • 学科 Engineering Electronics and Electrical.;Biology Neuroscience.;Psychology Cognitive.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 127 p.
  • 总页数 127
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:53:22

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号