首页> 外文学位 >Informative censoring with an imprecise anchor event: Estimation of change over time and implications for longitudinal data analysis.
【24h】

Informative censoring with an imprecise anchor event: Estimation of change over time and implications for longitudinal data analysis.

机译:具有不精确锚事件的信息审查:估计随时间的变化以及对纵向数据分析的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A number of methods have been developed to analyze longitudinal data with dropout. However, there is no uniformly accepted approach. Model performance, in terms of the bias and accuracy of the estimator, depends on the underlying missing data mechanism and it is unclear how existing methods will perform when little is known about the missing data mechanism.;Here we evaluate methods for estimating change over time in longitudinal studies with informative dropout in three settings: using a linear mixed effect (LME) estimator in the presence of multiple types of dropout; proposing an update to the pattern mixture modeling (PMM) approach in the presence of imprecision in identifying informative dropouts; and utilizing this new approach in the presence of prognostic factor by dropout interaction.;We demonstrate that amount of dropout, the proportion of dropout that is informative, and the variability in outcome all affect the performance of an LME estimator in data with a mixture of informative and non-informative dropout. When the amount of dropout is moderate to large (>20% overall) the potential for relative bias greater than 10% increases, especially with large variability in outcome measure, even under scenarios where only a portion of the dropouts are informative.;Under conditions where LME models do not perform well, it is necessary to take the missing data mechanism into account. We develop a method that extends the PMM approach to account for uncertainty in identifying informative dropouts. In scenarios with this uncertainty, the proposed method outperformed the traditional method in terms of bias and coverage.;In the presence of interaction between dropout and a prognostic factor, the LME model performed poorly, in terms of bias and coverage, in estimating prognostic factor-specific slopes and the interaction between the prognostic factor and time. The update to the PMM approach, proposed here, outperformed both the LME and traditional PMM.;Our work suggests that investigators must be cautious with any analysis of data with informative dropout. We found that particular attention must be paid to the model assumptions when the missing data mechanism is not well understood.
机译:已经开发出许多方法来分析具有遗漏的纵向数据。但是,没有统一接受的方法。就估计器的偏倚和准确性而言,模型性能取决于基本的缺失数据机制,并且在对缺失数据机制知之甚少时,尚不清楚现有方法将如何执行;在此我们评估了估计随时间变化的方法在纵向研究中,在三种情况下提供了有益的辍学:在存在多种类型的辍学时使用线性混合效应(LME)估计器;在识别信息缺失的过程中存在不精确的情况下,建议对模式混合建模(PMM)方法进行更新; ;我们证明了辍学的数量,提供信息的辍学比例以及结果的可变性均会影响LME估计量在混合数据中的表现。信息性和非信息性辍学。当辍学量为中等到较大(总体> 20%)时,相对偏倚的可能性会增加大于10%,尤其是在结果度量存在较大差异的情况下,即使在只有一部分辍学是有益的情况下也是如此。如果LME模型的效果不佳,则必须考虑缺失的数据机制。我们开发了一种方法,该方法扩展了PMM方法,以解决标识信息丢失的不确定性。在存在不确定性的情况下,所提出的方法在偏倚和覆盖率方面优于传统方法。;在辍学与预后因素之间存在相互作用的情况下,LME模型在偏倚和覆盖率方面在评估预后因素方面表现不佳。特定的斜率以及预后因素和时间之间的相互作用。此处提出的PMM方法更新优于LME和传统PMM 。;我们的工作表明,调查人员在对任何信息翔实的数据进行分析时必须谨慎。我们发现,当对丢失的数据机制了解得不够清楚时,必须特别注意模型假设。

著录项

  • 作者

    Collins, Jamie Elizabeth.;

  • 作者单位

    Boston University.;

  • 授予单位 Boston University.;
  • 学科 Biology Biostatistics.;Health Sciences Public Health.;Biology General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 185 p.
  • 总页数 185
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号