首页> 外文学位 >'Through a Thorough Individualized IEP Process': A Genealogical Policy Study of Special Education, Race, Disability, and Whiteness
【24h】

'Through a Thorough Individualized IEP Process': A Genealogical Policy Study of Special Education, Race, Disability, and Whiteness

机译:“通过彻底的个性化IEP过程”:特殊教育,种族,残障和白人的族谱政策研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This project explores American special education policy by juxtaposing two recent Supreme Court actions---Allston v. Lower Merion School District (2015) and Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District (2017)---to explicate how special education policy remains troubled by intersections of race and disability and the logics of whiteness and neoliberalism. Beginning with John Locke's reflections on education and concluding with the passage of the Education for All Handicapped Children Act (EHA), this genealogical inquiry traces the mediation of special education policy by legal protections that function biologically and through scientific descriptions that operate juridically. At the center of this project is an inquiry into present-historical configurations of special education and the ways race and disability move in and out of each other to create conditions that delimit educational opportunities for students of color. Of specific interest, is the historical development of indeterminate disability labeling schemes that continue to extend legal protections for some lives, while leaving other lives exposed to risk. This project problematizes present-historical configurations of special education from within three overlapping theoretical perspectives: a racecraft of disability labeling, extrapolated from the work of Barbara Fields and Karen Fields; a biopolitics of special education based on Michel Foucault's theorizing of the relation between life and politics; and an immunization paradigm of educational life, which reads Cheryl Harris' study of whiteness as property together with Roberto Esposito's reformulation of biopolitics as an immunity/community relation. Mapping this relation, this project analyzes the uses of classificatory science in debates over how to properly measure intelligence, parental lobbying efforts behind the passage of the EHA, and the limitations of framing special education policy in terms of equity and excellence. Against historical efforts to classify children according to intelligence, this project concludes by turning to John Dewey and Walter Benjamin's reflections on childhood to posit childhood as a philosophical method with the capacity to affirm present educational life.
机译:该项目通过将最高法院最近的两项诉讼并置-艾尔斯顿诉下梅里翁学区(2015)和恩德鲁·诉道格拉斯县学区(2017)-探索美国的特殊教育政策,以阐明特殊教育政策仍然存在的方式种族和残障的交汇以及白人和新自由主义的逻辑困扰着他们。从约翰·洛克(John Locke)对教育的思考开始,到《全残儿童教育法》(EHA)的通过,这一家谱研究都通过具有生物学作用的法律保护和通过司法运作的科学描述来追溯特殊教育政策的调解。该项目的中心是对特殊教育的当前历史配置以及种族和残障彼此进出的方式创造条件的研究,这些条件限制了有色学生的学习机会。特别令人关注的是不确定的残疾标签计划的历史发展,该计划继续扩大对某些生命的法律保护,而使其他生命面临风险。该项目从三个重叠的理论角度对特殊教育的当前历史结构提出了问题:从Barbara Fields和Karen Fields的工作推断出的残疾人标签赛车。基于米歇尔·福柯关于生命与政治之间关系的理论的特殊教育的生物政治学;以及教育生活的免疫范式,其中包括谢丽尔·哈里斯(Cheryl Harris)对白色作为财产的研究,以及罗伯托·埃斯波西托(Roberto Esposito)对生物政治的重新表述,将其作为一种免疫/社区关系。通过映射这种关系,该项目分析了分类科学在有关如何正确衡量智力,EHA通过后的父母游说努力以及在公平和卓越方面制定特殊教育政策的局限性的辩论中的用途。反对历史上根据智力对儿童进行分类的努力,该项目的结尾是约翰·杜威和沃尔特·本杰明对童年的反思,认为童年是一种有能力确认当前教育生活的哲学方法。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kearl, Benjamin Kelsey.;

  • 作者单位

    Indiana University.;

  • 授予单位 Indiana University.;
  • 学科 Educational philosophy.;Education history.;Education policy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2018
  • 页码 212 p.
  • 总页数 212
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:53:17

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号