首页> 外文学位 >Combustion of Nanocomposite Thermite Powders
【24h】

Combustion of Nanocomposite Thermite Powders

机译:纳米复合铝热粉的燃烧

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This work investigates combustion of nanocomposite thermite powders prepared by arrested reactive milling (ARM). The focus is on how ARM as a top-down approach to nano-thermite building generating fully-dense nanocomposite particles with dimensions of 1--100 microm affects the rates and mechanism of their combustion. A variety of thermites are milled using both aluminum and zirconium as fuels combined with several oxidizers (WoO3, MoO 3, CuO, Fe2O3, and Bi2O3). The powders are ignited using both an electrostatic discharge (ESD) and a CO2 laser beam.;A range of parameters vary in the first set of experiments in order to broadly understand the underlying combustion mechanisms of nanocomposite thermite powders. Only the aluminum thermites are considered in these experiments and had their particle sizes, preparation method (milled, mixed, or electrosprayed), and milling times adjusted in order to see their effects on combustion. Additionally the ESD ignition experiments vary the environment between air, argon, and vacuum, as well as varying the ignition voltages from 5 up to 20 kV at a constant capacitance of 2000 pF. The ignited particles are monitored using a photomultiplier tube (PMT) equipped with an interference filter. It is observed that the reaction rates of the ESD-initiated powders are unaffected by their particle size but are affected by their scale of mixing between their fuel and oxidizer within the particles themselves. The different preparation methods play a significant role in determining the powders performance. Mixed nano-powders agglomerated quite easily, which hinder their combustion performance. The electrosprayed powders perform well in all environments, and the milled powders perform best in oxidizer-free environments (when no reoxidation of the oxidizer could occur).;A set of experiments employing ESD ignition focus on the effects of powder load on its combustion properties. The experiments utilize a similar PMT setup with an additional 32-channel PMT coupled with a spectrometer to record optical emission in the range of 373--641 nm. It is discovered that when a monolayer of the powder was ignited, only single particles are ejected from the substrate and burned very rapidly. A thicker layer of powder (0.5 mm) struck by ESD produce an aerosol cloud, which ignite with a delay and burn substantially longer. It is theorized that the difference was due to different heating rates between the two experiments. In monolayer experiments, all ignited particles are ignited directly by ESD. Only a small fraction of particles in the thicker layered powder is heated directly by ESD; most particles are heated slower due to heat transfer from the initially ignited powder. More in depth experiments on the heating rate are conducted utilizing the fast heating of the thermites powders by ESD at ca. 109 K/s along with an experiment, in which the same thermite particles are heated and ignited by laser with the heating rate of ca. 106 K/s. It is discovered that laser-ignited particles combusted slower due to a loss of their nanostructure, while ESD-ignited particles maintained their nanostructure and burned much more quickly.;Utilizing the results from all the experiments, and combining them with combustion information previously obtained for Al and its ignition, with reaction controlled by polymorphic phase transformations in alumina (amorphous, gamma, and alpha), a model is developed enabling one to describe quantitatively the very high burn rates observed for the nanothermite particles rapidly heated by ESD. The model considers nanostructure accounting for the inclusion size distribution obtained from SEM images of actual milled particles, along with other considerations including heat loses, phase transformations, density changes, and particle size. The model is able to match combustion times and temperatures with those recorded from the earlier ESD combustion experiments.
机译:这项工作研究了通过停止反应研磨(ARM)制备的纳米复合铝热粉的燃烧。重点是ARM作为一种自上而下的纳米thermite建筑方法,如何生成尺寸为1--100微米的全密实纳米复合颗粒,从而影响其燃烧速率和燃烧机理。使用铝和锆作为燃料与几种氧化剂(WoO3,MoO3,CuO,Fe2O3和Bi2O3)结合使用,可以研磨各种铝热矿。使用静电放电(ESD)和CO2激光束点燃粉末。在第一组实验中,一系列参数有所不同,以便广泛理解纳米复合铝热剂粉末的潜在燃烧机理。在这些实验中仅考虑铝热盐,并对其粒径,制备方法(研磨,混合或电喷雾)和研磨时间进行了调整,以查看其对燃烧的影响。此外,ESD点火实验还改变了空气,氩气和真空之间的环境,并且在2000 pF的恒定电容下将点火电压从5 kV改变为20 kV。使用配备有干涉滤光片的光电倍增管(PMT)监控点燃的颗粒。观察到,ESD引发的粉末的反应速率不受其粒径的影响,但受其自身在颗粒内的燃料和氧化剂之间的混合规模的影响。不同的制备方法在确定粉末性能中起重要作用。混合的纳米粉很容易团聚,这阻碍了它们的燃烧性能。电喷雾粉末在所有环境下均表现良好,而研磨粉末在无氧化剂的环境下(当氧化剂不会发生再氧化时)表现最佳。;一组使用ESD点火的实验着眼于粉末负载对其燃烧性能的影响。实验使用了类似的PMT设置,带有一个额外的32通道PMT和一个光谱仪,以记录373--641 nm范围内的光发射。已经发现,当粉末的单层被点燃时,只有单个颗粒从基底上喷射出来并且非常迅速地燃烧。 ESD撞击较厚的粉末层(0.5 mm)会产生气溶胶云,该云会延迟点燃并燃烧更长的时间。从理论上讲,差异是由于两个实验之间的加热速率不同。在单层实验中,所有被点燃的颗粒都被ESD直接点燃。较厚的层状粉末中只有一小部分颗粒被ESD直接加热;由于最初点燃的粉末传热,大多数颗粒的加热速度变慢。利用ESD对铝热粉末的快速加热,大约在120℃下进行了关于加热速率的更深入的实验。以109 K / s的速度进行实验,其中相同的铝热剂颗粒被激光加热并点燃,加热速率大约为190 K / s。 106 K /秒。发现激光点燃的粒子由于其纳米结构的损失而燃烧较慢,而ESD点燃的粒子则保持其纳米结构并且燃烧得更快得多;利用所有实验的结果,并将其与先前获得的燃烧信息相结合Al及其点火,并通过氧化铝中的多态相变控制反应(非晶态,γ和α),开发了一种模型,该模型可以定量描述观察到的由ESD迅速加热的纳米热粒子的极高燃烧速率。该模型考虑了纳米结构,该结构考虑了从实际研磨的颗粒的SEM图像获得的夹杂物​​尺寸分布,以及其他考虑因素,包括热量损失,相变,密度变化和颗粒尺寸。该模型能够将燃烧时间和温度与早期ESD燃烧实验中记录的时间和温度进行匹配。

著录项

  • 作者

    Monk, Ian W.;

  • 作者单位

    New Jersey Institute of Technology.;

  • 授予单位 New Jersey Institute of Technology.;
  • 学科 Chemical engineering.;Materials science.;Thermodynamics.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2018
  • 页码 196 p.
  • 总页数 196
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号