首页> 外文学位 >Public Perception of Campus Safety Issues at Institutions of Higher Education in United States
【24h】

Public Perception of Campus Safety Issues at Institutions of Higher Education in United States

机译:美国高校对校园安全问题的公众看法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Campus safety issues have become a growing epidemic in United States. Several factors for instance active shooter incidents across United States may have created a negative correlation between parental/public perception and campus safety. Social amplification or attenuation of risk (SAAR), the theoretical framework for this research study, may play an influential role in swaying public opinion about campus safety and institutional selection process. This dissertation utilized the SPELIT Power Matrix needs assessment model, SAAR theoretical framework, and servant leadership model to determine which sources of information and what factors are influential in the decision-making process for selecting an IHE. This study used social media to reach out to millions of people anonymously to seek individual opinions and collect data to further analyze which factors and influences can affect decision making outcomes. The researcher offers one potential researched-based solution, the security awareness foundation etiquette (SAFE) card, which can guide college bound prospective students elevate their awareness and make more informed decisions. The researcher used Wilcoxon matched pairs tests to compare the mean score of college decision factors to determine which college decision factors were most significant. The following college decisions factors were significant sorted by highest mean score: campus safety (M = 4.43), Major (M = 4.41), program (M = 4.39), and cost (M = 4.27). The following information sources were significant, sorted by highest mean score: campus visit (M = 4.33), opinion of graduates (M =3.92), ratings given by impartial organizations such as US News and World Report (M = 3.68), and counselor recommendation (M = 3.54). When college decision factors and information sources were compared, a significant relationship was discovered between social media as an information source and campus safety as a college decision factor, with a correlation coefficient of r = .29. IHEs generally avoid displaying campus safety issues or negative news, therefore most and perhaps not all IHEs appear to have a safe campus. The theoretical framework for this study suggests that by omitting such facts as campus safety, social attenuation of risk may be affecting college bound prospective students' and respective parents' decision-making outcomes.
机译:在美国,校园安全问题已成为一种流行病。几个因素,例如在美国各地发生的射手事件,可能在父母/公众的认知与校园安全之间产生了负相关关系。这项研究的理论框架是社会放大或风险衰减(SAAR),可能在影响公众对校园安全和机构选择过程的意见方面发挥影响。本文利用SPELIT权力矩阵需求评估模型,SAAR理论框架和仆人领导模型来确定哪些信息源以及哪些因素对选择IHE的决策过程产生影响。这项研究使用社交媒体匿名接触了数百万人,以寻求个人意见并收集数据以进一步分析哪些因素和影响会影响决策结果。研究人员提供了一种潜在的基于研究的解决方案,即安全意识基础礼仪(SAFE)卡,该卡可以指导受大学欢迎的准学生提高他们的意识并做出更明智的决定。研究人员使用Wilcoxon配对配对测试比较大学决策因素的平均得分,以确定哪些大学决策因素最重要。以下大学决策因素按最高平均得分进行了显着排序:校园安全(M = 4.43),专业(M = 4.41),课程(M = 4.39)和成本(M = 4.27)。以下信息来源非常重要,按最高平均得分排序:校园访问(M = 4.33),毕业生意见(M = 3.92),公正的组织(例如《美国新闻与世界报道》(M = 3.68))和顾问提供的评分建议(M = 3.54)。当比较大学决策因素和信息来源时,发现社交媒体作为信息来源与校园安全作为大学决策因素之间存在显着关系,相关系数为r = .29。 IHE通常会避免显示校园安全问题或负面新闻,因此大多数(也许不是全部)IHE似乎都拥有安全的校园。这项研究的理论框架表明,通过忽略诸如校园安全之类的事实,社会对风险的衰减可能会影响到大学范围内的准学生及其父母的决策结果。

著录项

  • 作者

    Arasteh, Ray.;

  • 作者单位

    Pepperdine University.;

  • 授予单位 Pepperdine University.;
  • 学科 Education.;Higher education.;Educational sociology.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2018
  • 页码 151 p.
  • 总页数 151
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号