首页> 外文学位 >Clean my land: American Indians, tribal sovereignty, and the Environmental Protection Agency.
【24h】

Clean my land: American Indians, tribal sovereignty, and the Environmental Protection Agency.

机译:清洁我的土地:美洲印第安人,部落主权和环境保护局。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation is a case study of the Isleta Pueblos of central New Mexico, the Quapaw tribe of northeast Oklahoma, and the Osage Nation of northcentral Oklahoma, and their relationship with the federal government, and specifically the Environmental Protection Agency. As one of the youngest federal agencies, operating during the Self-Determination Era, it seems the EPA would be open to new approaches in federal Indian policy. In reality, the EPA has not reacted much differently than any other historical agency of the federal government. The EPA has rarely recognized the ability of Indians to take care of their own environmental problems. The EPA's unwillingness to recognize tribal sovereignty was no where clearer than in 2005, when Republican Senator James Inhof of Oklahoma added a rider to his transportation bill that made it illegal in Oklahoma for tribes to gain primary control over their environmental protection programs without first negotiating with, and gaining permission of, the state government of Oklahoma. The rider was an erosion of the federal trust relationship with American Indian tribes (as tribes do not need to heed state laws over federal laws) and an attack on native ability to judge tribal affairs. Oklahoma's tribes, and Indian leaders from around the nation, worked to get the new law overturned, but the EPA decided to help tribes work within the confines of the new law. Despite the EPA's stance on the new law, the tribes continued to try to fight back, as they had in the past when challenged by paternalistic federal policy. The EPA treated the Quapaws and Isletas in a similar fashion. Thus, the thesis of this study is that the EPA failed to respect the abilities of American Indian nations, as did federal agencies of years before, to manage their own affairs. Historians have largely neglected the role the EPA has played in recent Indian history and are just now beginning to document how deliberate efforts at self-determination have been employed by tribes for centuries in America.
机译:本文以新墨西哥州中部的Isleta Pueblos,俄克拉荷马州东北部的Quapaw部落以及俄克拉荷马州中北部的奥塞奇国家及其与联邦政府,特别是环境保护局的关系为例。作为在自决时代运作的最年轻的联邦机构之一,似乎EPA将会接受印度联邦政策的新方法。实际上,EPA的反应与联邦政府的其他历史机构没有太大不同。 EPA很少承认印第安人有能力解决自己的环境问题。 EPA不承认部落主权的意愿比2005年更加明显,当时共和党参议员俄克拉荷马州的詹姆斯·因霍夫(James Inhof)在他的交通法案中增加了一名骑手,这使得俄克拉荷马州的部落在未先与美国进行环境保护的情况下获得对其环境保护计划的主要控制权时是非法的。并获得俄克拉荷马州政府的许可。骑手是对与美洲印第安人部落的联邦信任关系的侵蚀(因为部落不需要遵守州法律而不是联邦法律),并且攻击了当地人判断部落事务的能力。俄克拉荷马州的部落以及来自全国各地的印度领导人都在努力推翻新法律,但EPA决定帮助部落在新法律的范围内开展工作。尽管美国环保署(EPA)对新法律持立场,但部落仍然像过去那样在家长式联邦政策的挑战下进行反击。 EPA以类似的方式对待Quapaws和Isletas。因此,本研究的主题是,EPA未能像几年前的联邦机构那样尊重美洲印第安人国家处理自己事务的能力。历史学家在很大程度上忽略了EPA在印度近代历史中所扮演的角色,并且刚刚开始记录美国部落在几个世纪以来如何认真地进行自决。

著录项

  • 作者

    Nolan, Raymond Anthony.;

  • 作者单位

    Kansas State University.;

  • 授予单位 Kansas State University.;
  • 学科 American history.;Native American studies.;Environmental studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 241 p.
  • 总页数 241
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号