首页> 外文学位 >An investigation of physical and virtual communication tools in improving the accuracy, utilization, and effectiveness of Agile projects.
【24h】

An investigation of physical and virtual communication tools in improving the accuracy, utilization, and effectiveness of Agile projects.

机译:对提高敏捷项目的准确性,利用率和有效性的物理和虚拟通信工具的调查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Effective communication within agile development projects is essential. It can impact the development projects success with respect to delivering the project on time, staying within budget, and staying within the accepted levels of quality. In recent years, research efforts have been focused on exploring the agile development solution space. Research on agile communication has historically focused on communication among team members and not on communication radiators such as work in progress boards.;Contrary to much of the consulting community's suggestions, the dissertation finds that there is not a correlation with the use of work in progress boards and delivering the project on time, staying within budget, or staying within the accepted levels of quality. As a result, any improved communications effectiveness the work in progress board may provide does not improve the probability of project success.;We collected stories from scrum masters, software developers and business executives. Our user stories described how the work in progress boards help with budgeting, time to market and code quality. We did find a significant disparity between what the survey takers described in their stories and their specific evaluation of the effectiveness of the work in progress board with respect to accuracy of data, delivering the project on time, meeting customer expectations, and managing workload.;Our research hypotheses were validated by a combination of mathematical proof, story analysis and story categorization. The data collection method used in this study is Sensemaker. Sensemaker has been used comprehensively in research, offering a quantitative approach to examining what has traditionally been a qualitative domain. We recommend further research to better understand the disparity between respondent stories and evaluations.;This research contributes to the body of knowledge of systems engineering in multiple areas: internal and external project communications, agile development, and the impact of agile development work in progress boards.
机译:在敏捷开发项目中进行有效的沟通至关重要。在按时交付项目,保持预算范围内以及保持在可接受的质量水平内,这可能会影响开发项目的成功。近年来,研究工作一直集中在探索敏捷开发解决方案空间上。历史上,敏捷沟通的研究一直集中在团队成员之间的沟通上,而不是在进行沟通的辐射体,例如进行中的工作委员会。;与咨询界的许多建议相反,本论文发现与进行中的工作的使用没有关联。董事会并按时交付项目,保持在预算范围内或保持在公认的质量水平内。结果,正在进行的工作委员会可能提供的任何提高的沟通效率都不会提高项目成功的可能性。;我们从Scrum主管,软件开发人员和业务主管那里收集了故事。我们的用户故事描述了进行中的工作板如何帮助预算,上市时间和代码质量。我们确实发现,在数据准确性,按时交付项目,满足客户期望和管理工作量方面,受访者在其故事中所描述的内容与他们对进行中的工作委员会的有效性的具体评估之间存在巨大差异。我们的研究假设已通过数学证明,故事分析和故事分类的组合得到了验证。本研究中使用的数据收集方法为Sensemaker。 Sensemaker已被广泛用于研究中,提供了一种定量方法来检查传统上是定性的领域。我们建议进行进一步的研究以更好地理解受访者的故事和评估之间的差异。该研究有助于系统工程在多个领域的知识体系:内部和外部项目沟通,敏捷开发以及进度板上敏捷开发工作的影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ens, Richard.;

  • 作者单位

    Stevens Institute of Technology.;

  • 授予单位 Stevens Institute of Technology.;
  • 学科 Information science.;Computer science.;Management.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 194 p.
  • 总页数 194
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号