首页> 外文学位 >Climate Extremes Over the Mid-Atlantic States: A Regional Approach
【24h】

Climate Extremes Over the Mid-Atlantic States: A Regional Approach

机译:中大西洋国家的极端气候:区域性方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Much of our current risk assessment, especially for extreme events and natural disasters, comes from the assumption that the likelihood of future extreme events can be predicted based on the past. However, as global temperatures rise, established climate ranges may no longer be applicable, as historic records for extremes such as heat waves and floods may no longer accurately predict the changing future climate. To assess extremes (present-day and future) over the contiguous United States, I used NOAA's Climate Extremes Index (CEI), which evaluates extremes in maximum and minimum temperature, extreme one-day precipitation, days without precipitation, and the Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI). The CEI is a spatially sensitive index that uses percentile-based thresholds rather than absolute values to determine climate "extremeness," and is thus well-suited to compare extreme climate across regions. I used regional climate model data from the North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program (NARCCAP) and the Coordinated Regional Downscaling Experiment (CORDEX) to compare a late 20th century reference period to a mid-21st century business as usual (RCP8.5 and SRES A2) greenhouse gas-forcing scenario. Additionally, I used CMIP3 and CMIP5 data to compare regional climate model data to its global climate model boundary forcings, to see what added value the regional climate models provide in the Mid-Atlantic region. Results show a universal increase in extreme temperatures across all models, with annual average maximum and minimum temperatures exceeding historic 90th percentile thresholds over more than 90% of the area assessed by 2068. Results for precipitation indicators have greater spatial variability from model to model, but indicate an overall movement towards less frequent but more extreme precipitation days in the future.
机译:我们当前的大部分风险评估(尤其是针对极端事件和自然灾害的风险评估)来自这样的假设,即可以根据过去预测未来极端事件的可能性。但是,随着全球温度的升高,建立的气候范围可能不再适用,因为热浪和洪水等极端事件的历史记录可能不再准确地预测未来气候的变化。为了评估连续美国的极端(现在和将来),我使用了NOAA的气候极端指数(CEI),该指数评估了最高和最低温度,一日极端降水,无降水天以及Palmer干旱严重程度的极端情况索引(PDSI)。 CEI是一种空间敏感指数,它使用基于百分位数的阈值而非绝对值来确定气候“极端性”,因此非常适合比较各个地区的极端气候。我使用了来自北美区域气候变化评估计划(NARCCAP)和协调区域降尺度实验(CORDEX)的区域气候模型数据,将20世纪晚期的参考时期与21世纪中叶的常规活动进行了比较(RCP8.5和SRES) A2)温室气体强迫情景。此外,我使用CMIP3和CMIP5数据将区域气候模型数据与其全球气候模型边界强迫进行了比较,以了解区域气候模型在中大西洋地区所提供的附加值。结果表明,所有模型的极端温度普遍升高,到2068年,超过90%的区域的年平均最高和最低温度超过了历史90%的阈值。降水指标的结果在不同模型之间具有较大的空间变异性,但是表明未来的降水日数将逐渐减少。

著录项

  • 作者

    Aiken, Emily K.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Delaware.;

  • 授予单位 University of Delaware.;
  • 学科 Climate change.;Atmospheric sciences.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2018
  • 页码 151 p.
  • 总页数 151
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号