首页> 外文学位 >Nepantla and Ubuntu ethics para nosotros: Beyond scrupulous adherence toward threshold perspectives of participatory/collaborative research ethics.
【24h】

Nepantla and Ubuntu ethics para nosotros: Beyond scrupulous adherence toward threshold perspectives of participatory/collaborative research ethics.

机译:Nepantla和Ubuntu道德规范:除了严格遵守参与式/协作式研究道德的门槛观点之外。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Participatory Action Research (PAR) refers less to a method and more to a continuum of approaches to collaborative inquiry. Within PAR, ideally, some phenomenon has been identified as a mutual area of concern to researchers and community members; working together they design, conduct, analyze, and disseminate the findings of a shared piece of research and coordinate action(s) aimed at using research to redress injustice. If PAR is embraced holistically boundaries inevitably blur as research team members become enmeshed in each other's lives. This blurring while momentous can give rise to ethical quandaries that IRB centered research ethics are inadequate to engage or provide parameters for the conduct of ethical participatory research. Borrowing from Borderlands scholarship I conceptualized PAR stakeholders as nepantleras. PAR researchers and their community partners are nepantleras because their work is about unremittingly trying to co-create and co-nurture counter-hegemonic research relationships bridging racial, ethnic, cultural, and social class boundaries within their collaborations. Nepantla perspectives give rise to Ubuntu ethical stances. Ubuntu ethics involves evaluation(s) of how our PAR builds capacity, sustains transparency of project aims, gauges accountability, assesses inclusivity, demonstrates trustworthiness, and the preservation of dignity at each stage of the research process. Using individual interviews and a longitudinal de-colonial ethnography of a community based ethical review board this dissertation attempted to understand how different nepantleras define the parameters of ethical conduct in research. In some ways I have accomplished this aim. I am in other respects left with the sobering realization that conducting ethical participatory research that embraces nepantla and Ubuntu ethics while working within the confines of conventional ethics is more difficult to conduct than I could have possibly imagined.
机译:参与式行动研究(PAR)较少涉及协作询问的方法,而更多地涉及协作询问的方法的连续性。在PAR内部,理想情况下,某些现象已被确定为研究人员和社区成员共同关心的领域;他们一起工作,设计,进行,分析和传播一项共同研究的结果,并协调旨在利用研究来纠正不公正现象的行动。如果全面接纳PAR,那么研究团队成员将陷入彼此的生活中,界限不可避免地会变得模糊。这种模糊而重要的时刻可能引起伦理困境,即以IRB为中心的研究伦理不足以进行伦理参与性研究或为其提供参数。从无主之地奖学金中借来的钱,我将PAR利益相关者概念化为nepantleras。 PAR研究人员及其社区合作伙伴是尼泊尔人,因为他们的工作是不懈地尝试在跨种族,种族,文化和社会阶层界限的合作中共同创造和共同培育反霸权的研究关系。 Nepantla的观点引起了Ubuntu的道德立场。 Ubuntu道德规范涉及对我们的PAR如何进行能力建设,维持项目目标的透明度,衡量问责制,评估包容性,证明可信赖性以及在研究过程的每个阶段维护尊严的评估。本论文使用个人访谈和基于社区的伦理审查委员会的纵向非殖民地民族志,试图了解不同的爬行动物如何定义研究中伦理行为的参数。我以某种方式实现了这一目标。我还清醒地意识到,在传统道德规范的范围内开展包含nepantla和Ubuntu道德规范的道德参与性研究比我想象的要难得多。

著录项

  • 作者

    Guishard, Monique A.;

  • 作者单位

    City University of New York.;

  • 授予单位 City University of New York.;
  • 学科 Ethics.;Epistemology.;Social psychology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 196 p.
  • 总页数 196
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:52:54

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号