首页> 外文学位 >Postcolonial challenges to madrassa education reform in India: Bureaucracy, politics, resistance, and cooptation.
【24h】

Postcolonial challenges to madrassa education reform in India: Bureaucracy, politics, resistance, and cooptation.

机译:印度对伊斯兰宗教教育改革的后殖民挑战:官僚主义,政治,抵抗和合作。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This qualitative study examines ways in which the Indian State and Islamic madrassas interact with each other, and attempts to shed light on the various social, political and economic factors that determine the nature of this interaction. The study is located within the existing policy context generated by the government of India to "modernize" madrassas and to improve the socio-economic conditions of Muslims, who constitute the largest minority population in the country. This research argues that the present relationship between the government and madrassas is reminiscent of the colonial relationship between these two institutions. This hypothesis is based on facts about attitudes of resistance and assertions of religious identity developed in response to cultural, economic, and political oppression by the British government, which has been transposed onto Hindu majority rule since India's independence in 1947.;For this research, data about policy processes were collected at the national level in New Delhi, at the provincial level in Uttar Pradesh, and at the district level in Barabanki, Azamgarh, Bareilly, and Saharanpur. Across these four districts, 28 madrassas were sampled to capture a classification of madrassas based on their relationship with government funding as well as their sectarian ideology for religion and education. In the process, a total of 148 interviews, 25 focus groups, and 32 sessions of non-participatory observations were conducted.;Dichotomization of knowledge into religious and secular, and development vision into traditional and modern, was found to be at the core of most contemporary arguments for and against the State's vision and plans to modernize madrassas. Within the broad framework of postcolonial critique, this dissertation presents an educational application of cooptation theory (Selznick, 1949) that explains various ongoing transformations of and resistances within the madrassa system of education in India. By deconstructing the role of government into political and bureaucratic, this study distinguishes between authorized and unauthorized policies that govern local interactions between the State and madrassas.
机译:这项定性研究考察了印度国家和伊斯兰教徒之间的互动方式,并试图阐明决定这种互动性质的各种社会,政治和经济因素。这项研究是在印度政府制定的现行政策背景下进行的,旨在“现代化”伊斯兰宗教组织并改善穆斯林人口的社会经济状况,穆斯林是该国最大的少数民族人口。这项研究认为,政府与政府之间的当前关系使人联想到这两个机构之间的殖民关系。此假设基于以下事实:英国政府针对文化,经济和政治压迫而产生的抵抗态度和宗教认同主张的事实,自1947年印度独立以来,该态度已转变为印度多数统治。有关政策流程的数据是在新德里的国家级,北方邦的省级以及巴拉班奇,阿赞加尔,巴雷利和撒哈拉普尔的地区级收集的。在这四个地区中,对28个宗教专家进行了抽样调查,以根据其与政府资金的关系以及其宗教和教育的宗派意识形态来分类。在此过程中,共进行了148次访谈,25个焦点小组和32次非参与性观察;将知识分为宗教和世俗,将发展愿景分为传统和现代,这是支持和反对国家的远见和现代化madrassas计划的大多数当代论据。在后殖民批评的广泛框架内,本论文提出了合作选择理论的教育应用(Selznick,1949),该理论解释了印度madrassa教育体系内各种正在进行的变革和阻力。通过将政府的角色分解为政治和官僚机构,本研究区分了管理国家与宗教之间的地方互动的授权和未授权政策。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kidwai, Huma.;

  • 作者单位

    Teachers College, Columbia University.;

  • 授予单位 Teachers College, Columbia University.;
  • 学科 Education policy.;Religious education.;Asian history.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 290 p.
  • 总页数 290
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:52:50

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号