首页> 外文学位 >A foreign and domestic policy gap: The resettlement of our allies.
【24h】

A foreign and domestic policy gap: The resettlement of our allies.

机译:国内外政策上的差距:我们同盟国的重新安置。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

When U.S. foreign policy involves overt intervention abroad, the employment of local nationals is common and necessary. Foreign nationals who work for the U.S., in some instances, are threatened due to that relationship. In specific cases, policymakers have authorized and funded the immigration of foreign nationals who had worked for and with the U.S. and were targeted due to that relationship. However, the U.S. has no consistent policy on the domestic resettlement of foreign nationals as a consequence of their support of US military interventions.;This multi-case study analyzed the domestic resettlement of Vietnamese, Iraqi Kurds, Iraq and Afghans Special Immigrant Visa-holders. I evaluated policies, appropriations, and legislation. I also interviewed SIV holders, federal and state agencies, as well as resettlement organizations. The purpose of the research was to understand the resettlement policy, past and current practices, organizational structure and relationships, and develop best practices for future resettlement of foreign nationals.;The study revealed that the policy of "self-sustainability," as embedded in the Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1965, is largely unachievable in today's economic and social environment. Further, labor market conditions, as well as the lack of mobility of benefits and access to adequate transportation, further limit immigrants' ability to achieve self-sustainability. Immigration policy and practices are largely out of date and do not support integration in the 21st century American economy. Simply resettling immigrants who sacrificed blood and treasure for the United States with outdated policies is unconscionable. I recommend reforming the existing system to allow the transfer of medical and social benefits across state lines. Further, investing in a holistic evaluation of the immigrant's family situation, job skills, and ambitions prior to arrival will result in an efficient and effective resettlement.
机译:当美国外交政策涉及在国外进行公开干预时,雇用当地国民是普遍且必要的。在某些情况下,在美国工作的外国国民由于这种关系而受到威胁。在特定情况下,政策制定者已经授权并资助了曾在美国和与美国合作并因这种关系而成为目标的外国人的移民。但是,由于外国人支持美国的军事干预措施,美国对他们在国内的重新安置没有统一的政策;这项多案例研究分析了越南,伊拉克库尔德人,伊拉克和阿富汗特别移民签证持有人的国内重新安置。 。我评估了政策,拨款和立法。我还采访了SIV持有者,联邦和州机构以及移民组织。该研究的目的是了解移民政策,过去和当前的做法,组织结构和关系,并为外国人未来的移民制定最佳做法。;研究表明,“自我可持续性”政策已嵌入其中。在当今的经济和社会环境中,1965年的《移民和归化法》在很大程度上是无法实现的。此外,劳动力市场状况以及福利缺乏流动性和获得充足运输的机会,进一步限制了移民实现自我维持的能力。移民政策和做法在很大程度上已经过时,并且不支持21世纪美国经济的一体化。仅仅以过时的政策重新安置那些为美国献血和财宝的移民是不合情理的。我建议对现有系统进行改革,以允许跨州界转移医疗和社会福利。此外,在移民到来之前对移民的家庭状况,工作技能和抱负进行全面评估,将会带来有效的安置。

著录项

  • 作者

    Carson, Jeffrey L.;

  • 作者单位

    Northeastern University.;

  • 授予单位 Northeastern University.;
  • 学科 Social research.;Military history.;Public policy.
  • 学位 D.L.P.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 125 p.
  • 总页数 125
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号