首页> 外文学位 >Searching for the Social: Corporate Social Responsibility and Economic Regulation Beyond the State.
【24h】

Searching for the Social: Corporate Social Responsibility and Economic Regulation Beyond the State.

机译:寻找社会:超越国家的企业社会责任和经济法规。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The politics of "corporate social responsibility" (CSR) have been suggested as a way to help respond to some of the governance gaps caused by globalization. However, CSR struggles with the question of how critical it can be, and particularly whether it can condemn market agents as subjectively antisocial. CSR is thus perpetually caught between critics on the right who dismiss its real-world seriousness, and critics on the left who worry about its co-optation by the imperatives of business. Both camps suggest that focusing on workplace subjectivity is irrelevant and distracting. Meanwhile, "on the ground", activists plainly do just that. The question is what is lost, in terms of effective governance, when we deny that it is useful to challenge organizational personas and managerial subjectivities. To assess this, I deploy a governmentality analysis to pick apart how CSR politics typically weave together two distinct ways of thinking about regulation. These two "political rationalities" facilitate different discursive framing techniques and different political practices. I argue that CSR's more critical politics often flow from what Foucauldian scholars call "the social" or "social government". "Social government" champions a sense of our interdependence, and often targets the subjectivities of market agents as a way to extra-legally address market abuses. However, theorists have been lamenting the decline of "the social" for decades. What explains the continuing vitality of these supposedly irrelevant politics? I show that recent critical manifestations of CSR politics draw from under-theorized non-state modes of "the social", and are hybridized to fit an increasingly marketized world. These "social" politics can help us build theory about CSR phenomena, as these politics draw much of their normative power from implicit critiques of managerial subjectivities, and reflect only ephemerally any supposed social rules.
机译:有人提出“企业社会责任”(CSR)政治作为一种方法来帮助应对全球化造成的某些治理差距。但是,企业社会责任在问题上有多重要,尤其是它是否可以将市场代理商谴责为主观反社会问题。因此,企业社会责任永远陷入右派的批评家,他们驳斥了其现实世界的严肃性,而左派的批评家则担心企业的当务之急。两个阵营都表明,专注于工作场所的主观性是无关紧要的,并且会分散注意力。同时,在“实地”,活动家显然做到了这一点。问题是,当我们否认挑战组织角色和管理主体性很有用时,在有效治理方面会损失什么。为了评估这一点,我进行了政府性分析,以区分企业社会责任政治通常如何将两种不同的监管方式编织在一起。这两个“政治理性”促进了不同的话语框架技术和不同的政治实践。我认为,企业社会责任的更为批判性的政治往往源于福柯学者所说的“社会”或“社会政府”。 “社会政府”倡导我们相互依存的感觉,并经常以市场代理人的主观性为目标,以此法外解决市场滥用行为。然而,几十年来,理论家一直为“社会”的衰落而感叹。是什么解释了这些所谓无关紧要的政治的持续活力?我表明,近来企业社会责任政治的重要表现来自理论不足的非国家“社会”模式,并且它们相互融合以适应日益市场化的世界。这些“社会”政治可以帮助我们建立有关CSR现象的理论,因为这些政治从管理主观性的隐含批判中汲取了许多规范力量,并且仅短暂地反映了任何假定的社会规则。

著录项

  • 作者

    Sabadoz, Cameron.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Toronto (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Toronto (Canada).;
  • 学科 Labor relations.;Political science.;Management.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 438 p.
  • 总页数 438
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:52:30

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号