首页> 外文学位 >State reporting requirements and non-profit hospital community benefit spending.
【24h】

State reporting requirements and non-profit hospital community benefit spending.

机译:州报告要求和非营利性医院社区受益支出。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this paper, we examined whether state community benefit reporting laws were associated with non-profit hospital community benefit spending. We hypothesized that hospitals in states with these requirements would spend a greater proportion of their total operating expenses on community benefits. In addition, we considered that levels of charity care spending would be more influenced by community needs than by laws. Therefore, we also hypothesized that the increase in overall spending due to state laws would be driven by spending on community benefit activities focused on public and population health rather than direct hospital care provision.;The dependent variables were the percent of hospitals' total expenses that went towards (1) overall community benefit spending, (2) at-cost charity care spending, and (3) population-oriented health efforts. Accounting for correlation within hospital referral regions, we modeled each dependent variable as a function of state reporting laws, as well as hospital and market characteristics that may include drivers of community benefit spending.;Over 3,100 non-profit hospital facilities that submitted community benefit data to the IRS via Form 990 and Schedule H from 2009-2011.;On average, non-profit hospitals spent 7.8% of their total expenses on any community benefits, 2.2% on at-cost charity care benefits, and 2.6% on population health benefits. While there was a significant relationship between reporting laws and spending for hospitals that were not dependent on Medicaid for revenue, this was not the case for Medicaid-dependent hospitals (p=.688). Among the former, the presence of a state reporting requirement was associated with a 12.4% increase in the percent of total expenses dedicated to community benefits (p=.001). This increase was driven by population-oriented benefit spending; there was no significant relationship between reporting requirements and charity care spending (p=.335), but the spending ratio for alternate community benefits was 14.4% greater when hospitals were in states with such a requirement (p=.039).;Overall, state reporting laws were correlated with increased hospital spending on community benefit activities. These laws appear to be most impactful on hospitals with greater financial flexibility and activities related to public and population health rather than direct care provision.
机译:在本文中,我们研究了州社区福利报告法律是否与非营利性医院社区福利支出相关。我们假设有这些要求的州的医院会将其总运营支出中的较大一部分用于社区福利。此外,我们认为慈善机构护理支出的水平将更多地受到社区需求的影响,而不是法律的影响。因此,我们还假设由于州法律而导致的总支出增加将由专注于公共和人口健康而不是直接提供医院护理的社区福利活动的支出驱动;因变量是医院总支出中所占百分比转向(1)总体社区福利支出,(2)按成本计的慈善护理支出以及(3)面向人群的卫生工作。考虑到医院转诊地区之间的相关性,我们根据州报告法律以及医院和市场特征(可能包括社区福利支出的驱动因素)对每个因变量进行建模;超过3,100家提交社区福利数据的非营利性医院机构通过2009年至2011年间通过表格990和附表H提交给IRS;平均而言,非营利性医院将其总支出的7.8%用于任何社区福利,将2.2%用于按成本收费的慈善医疗福利,以及2.6%用于人口健康好处。尽管报告法律与不依赖医疗补助收入的医院的支出之间存在着显着的关系,但依靠医疗补助的医院却并非如此(p = .688)。在前者中,州报告要求的存在与专门用于社区福利的总支出百分比增加了12.4%(p = .001)。这一增长是由面向人口的福利支出驱动的;报告要求与慈善护理支出之间没有显着关系(p = .335),但是当医院位于有此要求的州时,其他社区福利的支出比率则提高了14.4%(p = .039)。州报告法律与医院在社区福利活动上的支出增加有关。这些法律似乎对医院产生最大的影响,因为它们具有更大的财务灵活性以及与公共和人口健康有关的活动,而不是直接提供医疗服务。

著录项

  • 作者

    Johnson, Emily Katherine.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Colorado Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus.;

  • 授予单位 University of Colorado Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus.;
  • 学科 Public health.;Public policy.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 34 p.
  • 总页数 34
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号