首页> 外文学位 >Making a case for transitional justice in predicting for human rights compliance and the duration of post-civil war peace.
【24h】

Making a case for transitional justice in predicting for human rights compliance and the duration of post-civil war peace.

机译:在预测人权遵守情况和内战后和平的持续时间时,为过渡司法提供依据。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

For long, the discourse on civil war, its causes, management and the conditions for peace featured less strongly in the empirical mainstream of the field. Nonetheless, over the past decade or so, several empirically nuanced works offered varied explanations on various aspects of intra-state conflicts in an attempt to account for conditions under which the peace that follows such devastating episodes succeeds or otherwise fails. Despite these gains, both theoretical and empirical puzzles persist; more so those to do with the delicate transitional phases that immediately follow major civil wars. Informed by four main theoretical premises emerging from this literature; this study set-out to contribute to this debate by undertaking a two-stage examination of the effect of transitional justice (TJ) on post-civil war human rights (HR) compliance and duration of peace. To this end, a time-series cross-national dataset for the period 1970-2006 was utilized in testing two broad sets of hypotheses on this relationship. The findings support the general hypothetical contention that TJ has a likely positive impact on human rights compliance as well as less likelihood of civil war recurrence. More specifically however, the findings exhibited stronger support for the legalist argument (mainly on trials and lustration policies); while presenting "mixed findings" for the emotional psychology approach; with more empirical support for amnesties and reparations, but much less in support for truth-telling processes. Nonetheless, pragmatic and/or holistic propositions for combination(s) of both restorative and retributive TJ mechanisms appeared to enjoy much less empirical support. However, the findings did support the credible commitments argument pointing to higher HR compliance effect associated with states' signing and ratification the Rome Statute as well a positive effect of the same on post-civil war peace durations.
机译:长期以来,关于内战,其原因,管理和和平条件的论述在该领域的经验主流中的作用较弱。然而,在过去的十年左右的时间里,一些经验上细微的作品对国家内部冲突的各个方面提供了不同的解释,试图解释这种破坏性事件之后的和平成功与否的条件。尽管取得了这些成就,但理论和经验上的难题仍然存在。那些与紧随内战之后的微妙过渡阶段有关的问题。由该文献中出现的四个主要理论前提提供信息;这项研究旨在通过对过渡司法(TJ)对内战后人权(HR)遵守和和平持续时间的影响进行两阶段审查,从而为这一辩论做出贡献。为此,使用了1970-2006年期间的时间序列跨国数据集来检验关于这一关系的两套假设。这些发现支持了一般的假设论点,即TJ可能对遵守人权有积极影响,而内战复发的可能性也较小。但是,更具体地说,调查结果显示出对法家论点的支持(主要是关于审判和淫荡政策);同时展示情绪心理学方法的“混合发现”;对大赦和赔偿的经验支持更多,但对讲真相的支持却少得多。但是,恢复性和报酬性TJ机制组合的实用和/或整体主张似乎获得的经验支持要少得多。但是,这些发现确实支持了可信承诺的论点,该论点指出,与各州签署和批准《罗马规约》相关的更高的人力资源合规效果,以及对内战后和平时期的积极影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    Nzau, Mumo.;

  • 作者单位

    State University of New York at Buffalo.;

  • 授予单位 State University of New York at Buffalo.;
  • 学科 Political science.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 142 p.
  • 总页数 142
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号