首页> 外文学位 >A TIME TO FAVOR ZION: A CASE STUDY OF RELIGION AS A FORCE IN AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 1830-1870.
【24h】

A TIME TO FAVOR ZION: A CASE STUDY OF RELIGION AS A FORCE IN AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 1830-1870.

机译:锡安时代的来临:宗教在1830年至1870年间在美国教育发展中的作用作为个案研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Given the highly malleable character of American education in the middle and late nineteenth century, why did it develop in the familiar patterns which are still with us? In part, the answer lies in the religious idealogical bases which motivated public and parochial school formation. Evangelical Protestants promoted schooling as an extension of their missionary activity, creating a de facto Protestant public school system. Catholics, motivated by an ideology which saw education as a parental and Church responsibility and by their alienation from public schooling, moved to develop a parallel network for parochial schools.;Active in school development were the leaders of the pan-Protestant voluntary organizations, who created anti-Catholic sentiment as a means of promoting public schooling. Catholic schools developed from academies for elites, with impetus provided by alienation from the Protestant-denominated culture, as well as by funds supplied from European Catholic organizations which collected money to meet perceived Protestant threats.; Over time, ideological conflicts escalated, with Catholics and Protestants battling over the use of the King James Bible in the schools, as well as the propriety of using public funding for parochial education. A School Board Resolution of 1842 attempting to solve the problem of Bible use went unenforced, leading to another controversy over the same issue ten years later.; In an attempt to procure a share of the School Fund for their institutions, Catholic leaders urged their congregations to bloc vote in the municipal elections of 1853, creating strong anti-Catholic sentiment. The election was won by Catholic-supported Democrats, but the anti-Catholic vote, split between a multiplicity of candidates, had actually been larger.;This study examines educational development in Cincinnati, Ohio from 1830 to 1870. Religion is seen as an important factor in the region's school development, and it is clear that public and parochial schooling took their respective directions in part as a result of ideological clash.;In 1869, the zenith of religious conflict over schooling was reached. In an attempt to smooth the way for a proposed merger of public and parochial schools, the School Board removed the Bible completely from the public schools, provoking a court suit which pitted evangelicals against an alliance of Catholics, Jews, and liberals. While the former won in the local court, the Ohio Supreme Court upheld the Board's decision, and ruled that the public schools just be religiously neutral.;The period following this controversy was one of increased separation between public and parochial schooling. Although the public schools maintained a vaguely Protestant tone, they were increasingly secularized. Catholics, opposed to this trend, moved to found their own schools, forcing compliance by pastors and parents. The lines of distinction between public and parochial education became increasingly sharp, though some Protestants still attended Catholic schools, and many Catholics frequented public ones.;Events in the late 1970s and early 1980s indicate that religion is still a factor in educational development. Nineteenth century conflicts over the use of the King James Bible point out a need to move beyond the symbols which appear to be the center of school conflict to the ideological differences which are the real cause. The fact that American education could have taken a different turn in the nineteenth century suggests that sensitivity to issues of ideological differences could help educational leaders to promote a wider consensus in our own day.
机译:考虑到美国教育在19世纪中后期具有很高的延展性,为什么它以我们仍然熟悉的模式发展?在某种程度上,答案在于激发公立学校和教区学校形成的宗教思想基础。福音派新教徒将学校教育作为其宣教活动的延伸,从而建立了事实上的新教徒公立学校体系。天主教徒出于将教育视为父母和教会的责任的意识形态以及他们脱离公立学校的动机而动身,发展了平行学校的网络。;活跃于学校发展的是新教义志愿组织的领导人。产生了反天主教情绪,以此来促进公立学校的发展。天主教学校是从精英学院发展而来的,其动力来自于以新教徒命名的文化的疏远,以及欧洲天主教组织提供的资金,这些组织收集资金以应对新教徒的威胁。随着时间的流逝,意识形态冲突升级,天主教徒和新教徒为在学校中使用《詹姆士圣经》而战,以及利用公共资金进行狭par教育的妥协。试图解决圣经使用问题的1842年校务委员会决议未得到执行,十年后,在同一问题上又引发了另一场争议。为了为学校筹集一定比例的学校基金,天主教领袖敦促他们的会众在1853年的市政选举中进行集体投票,从而产生了强烈的反天主教情绪。这次选举是由天主教徒支持的民主党人赢得的,但是由多个候选人组成的反对天主教徒的选票实际上更大。该研究考察了1830年至1870年俄亥俄州辛辛那提的教育发展。宗教被认为是重要的这是该地区学校发展的一个重要因素,很明显,由于意识形态冲突,部分原因是公立学校和狭och学校接受了各自的指导。1869年,在学校教育方面达到了宗教冲突的顶峰。为了使提议的公立学校和教区学校合并顺利进行,校务委员会完全从公立学校中删除了圣经,提出了诉讼,使福音派信徒与天主教徒,犹太人和自由主义者组成联盟。尽管前者在地方法院获胜,但俄亥俄州最高法院维持了委员会的决定,并裁定公立学校在宗教上是中立的。这一争议之后的时期是公立学校与狭och学校之间日益分离的时期之一。尽管公立学校保持着模糊的新教语调,但它们越来越世俗化。反对这种趋势的天主教徒开始建立自己的学校,迫使牧师和父母遵守。尽管一些新教徒仍在天主教学校上学,而许多天主教徒经常在公立学校上学,但公共教育和狭par教育之间的界线变得越来越清晰。1970年代末和1980年代初的事件表明,宗教仍然是教育发展的一个因素。十九世纪在使用《詹姆士圣经》时发生的冲突指出,有必要超越似乎是学校冲突中心的符号,转向真正的意识形态差异。美国教育在19世纪可能发生了变化,这一事实表明,对意识形态差异问题的敏感性可以帮助教育领导者在当今时代促进更广泛的共识。

著录项

  • 作者

    PERKO, FRANCIS MICHAEL.;

  • 作者单位

    Stanford University.;

  • 授予单位 Stanford University.;
  • 学科 Education History of.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1981
  • 页码 255 p.
  • 总页数 255
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:51:35

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号