首页> 外文学位 >PARADIGMS, CONFLICT, AND CHOICE -- INTEGRATING PERSPECTIVES TO DESIGN RESOURCE POLICIES, THE WOOD ENERGY EXAMPLE
【24h】

PARADIGMS, CONFLICT, AND CHOICE -- INTEGRATING PERSPECTIVES TO DESIGN RESOURCE POLICIES, THE WOOD ENERGY EXAMPLE

机译:范式,冲突和选择-整合设计资源政策的观点,例如木材能源

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The use of wood to produce energy in the United States grew from approximately 0.8 quadrillion Btus (quads) in 1970 to about 2.4 quads in 1980. This thesis addresses this emerging use of the forest resource from the perspective of the science of policy analysis.;The thesis first documents current trends in the use of wood as an energy resource in the residential, industrial, electric utility, and liquid fuels sectors. It then examines the physical capability of the forest resource to support these continuing trends in the production of energy from wood in each of five forested regions. Next the technological and environmental readiness of wood energy systems are assessed. The cost competitiveness of wood energy systems is also examined using the present value of lifecycle costs approach. Non-economic factors affecting the adoption of wood energy systems are subsequently considered. Finally, both public and private interests concerned about or affected by wood energy use are identified and their attitudes toward alternative policies proposed to enhance wood energy use are assessed.;The above analyses led to the design of four scenarios that could characterize wood energy use in the year 2000. Classified as low, moderate, and rapid growth and growth in the event of an energy emergency, these scenarios identify probable levels of use by region in the forest industry, residential, commercial, industrial, methanol, and electric utility sectors. The total expected contribution to national energy supplies from wood ranges between 4 and 7.5 quads but could reach as much as 9.5 quads in the event of an energy emergency. The implications of these alternative scenarios for wood supplies, energy self-sufficiency, balance of trade, employment, government revenues, inflation, and the environment are examined.;In light of these analyses, ten sets of alternative policy options proposed to encourage wood energy use are evaluated. Their potential effectiveness, positive and adverse effects, and chances for selection are analyzed. A recommended policy approach is proposed.;A final chapter assesses the usefulness of the approach taken and discusses the implications of this research for the analysis of resource policies in general.
机译:在美国,使用木材生产能源的比例从1970年的约0.8万亿Btus(夸脱)增加到1980年的约2.4夸脱。本文从政策分析科学的角度解决了这种新兴的森林资源利用问题。本文首先记录了住宅,工业,电力和液体燃料领域中木材作为能源使用的当前趋势。然后,它研究了森林资源在五个森林区域中每个森林中支持木材能源生产这些持续趋势的物理能力。接下来,评估木材能源系统的技术和环境就绪性。木材能源系统的成本竞争力还使用生命周期成本方法的现值进行了检验。随后考虑了影响采用木材能源系统的非经济因素。最后,确定了与木材能源使用有关或受其影响的公共和私人利益,并评估了他们对旨在提高木材能源使用的替代政策的态度。;以上分析导致设计了四种可表征木材能源使用的方案在2000年。分类为低,中,快速增长以及在发生能源紧急事件时的增长,这些场景确定了森林工业,住宅,商业,工业,甲醇和电力部门中各地区的可能使用水平。木材对国家能源供应的预期总贡献在4到7.5方形之间,但在发生能源紧急情况时,可能达到9.5方形。研究了这些替代方案对木材供应,能源自给自足,贸易平衡,就业,政府收入,通货膨胀和环境的影响。根据这些分析,提出了十套替代政策方案,以鼓励木质能源使用进行评估。分析了它们的潜在效力,正面和负面影响以及选择的机会。提出了一种建议的政策方法。最后一章评估了所采用方法的有效性,并讨论了本研究对总体资源政策分析的意义。

著录项

  • 作者

    HEWETT, CHARLES EARLE.;

  • 作者单位

    Yale University.;

  • 授予单位 Yale University.;
  • 学科 Forestry.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1982
  • 页码 511 p.
  • 总页数 511
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:51:32

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号