首页> 外文学位 >A COMPARISON OF CLASSROOM INSTRUCTION, COMMUNITY INSTRUCTION, AND INDEPENDENCE INSTRUCTION ON ACQUISITION OF PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SKILLS BY RETARDED ADULTS.
【24h】

A COMPARISON OF CLASSROOM INSTRUCTION, COMMUNITY INSTRUCTION, AND INDEPENDENCE INSTRUCTION ON ACQUISITION OF PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SKILLS BY RETARDED ADULTS.

机译:延迟成人获取公共交通技能的课堂教学,社区教学和独立教学的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study evaluated Classroom, Community, and Independence Instruction Procedures to teach public transportation usage skills to retarded adults. Twenty-seven individuals who resided at a facility for the mentally retarded participated. Nine subjects were randomly assigned to each treatment group. Subjects ranged in age from 17 to 59 years of age (x = 35.1) and were classified in the mild to severe range of mental retardation. Subjects were taught each of the components of locating, signaling, boarding and riding, and exiting a bus. Subjects in each treatment condition received 20, one hour instructional sessions.;A three groups by two repeated measures analysis of variance was used to determine if the treatment groups significantly differed in degree of acquisition of public transportation skills. A Scheefe t test was used where a significant F ratio was found in order to determine where the differences exist.;Chi-square was used to determine if differences existed between the three treatment groups in regard to the number of subjects who successfully completed the public transportation program.;Analysis of pretreatment, posttreatment, and pretreatment to posttreatment change scores for all subjects on the Public Transportation Inventory indicated a significant F ratio at the .025 level of confidence for the treatment by trials interaction. Results of the Scheefe t test indicated that improvement from pretreatment to posttreatment as a result of training was significant for all three treatment groups. The Independence Group showed the greatest degree of improvement with a mean change score of 6.62 steps per subject as compared to 5.75 steps for the Community Group and 4.50 for the Classroom Group.;Pretest, posttest, generalization probes, and daily data collection during training trials were recorded on the Public Transportation Inventory. Additionally, the number of training sessions required by each subject to complete the training program was recorded.;Pairwise chi-square comparisons indicated that at the .05 level of confidence, a significantly greater number of subjects in the Community Group (n = 7) successfully completed the public transportation program than subjects in the Classroom Group (n = 2). Six subjects successfully completed the training program in the Independence Group, however, this did not significantly differ from the other treatment groups.
机译:这项研究评估了课堂,社区和独立指导程序,以向智障成年人传授公共交通工具的使用技巧。住在智障设施的27个人参加了活动。将9名受试者随机分配至每个治疗组。受试者年龄从17岁到59岁不等(x = 35.1),并被分类为轻度至重度智力低下。教给对象的定位,发信号,上车和乘车以及下车的各个组成部分。每种治疗条件下的受试者接受20个小时的指导课。3组,通过两次重复测量的方差分析来确定治疗组在掌握公共交通技能方面是否存在显着差异。使用Scheefe t检验,在其中发现显着的F比率以确定差异存在于何处;使用卡方检验确定在三个治疗组之间是否存在成功完成公众试验的受试者人数方面的差异在公共交通清单上对所有受试者的预处理,后处理和前处理至后处理变化分数的分析表明,试验交互作用对治疗的置信度在.025处具有显着的F比率。 Scheefe t检验的结果表明,通过训练,从治疗前到治疗后的改善对所有三个治疗组都是显着的。独立小组表现出最大程度的改善,每位受试者的平均变化得分为6.62步,而社区小组为5.75步,课堂小组为4.50 .;训练试验期间的前测,后测,泛化探究和每日数据收集被记录在公共交通清单上。此外,记录了每个受试者完成培训计划所需的培训课程数量。逐对卡方比较表明,在置信度为.05的情况下,社区组中的受试者数量大大增加(n = 7)成功地完成了公共交通计划,比班级组中的受试者要多(n = 2)。 6名受试者成功地完成了独立组的培训计划,但是,与其他治疗组没有明显差异。

著录项

  • 作者

    MARCHETTI, ALLEN.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Alabama.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Alabama.;
  • 学科 Education Special.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1982
  • 页码 113 p.
  • 总页数 113
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号