首页> 外文学位 >Project a-pulseRTM a high school program motivating students by increasing their performance in the health sciences and strengthening the skillset of future heatlh care providers
【24h】

Project a-pulseRTM a high school program motivating students by increasing their performance in the health sciences and strengthening the skillset of future heatlh care providers

机译:将a-pulseRTM项目设计为一项高中计划,通过提高学生在健康科学领域的表现并增强未来保健服务提供者的技能来激励他们

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this research study was to determine if a program designed for the high school student proved to be a statistically significant motivational factor in the overall outcome affecting student performance.;The literature review supports two crucial arguments as to why it is necessary to concentrate on the high school age group. The initial target centers on motivation and the role it plays in the student learning process. The second perspective determines if the high school medical program motivates students to outperform their peers in the following areas: The degree of knowledge, inquiry base-learning and critical thinking skills specifically to the health sciences. The research questions and hypotheses formulated for the study were statistically supported and the results confirmed that a motivational program has a direct impact and positive influence on student performance.;The methodology utilized for the study consisted of a mixed quantitative--qualitative, longitudinal cohort design. The rational for applying a longitudinal cohort methodology was attributable to the researcher examining, in depth, a motivational program and the collection of detailed information over a sustaining period of 5 years.;The research study compared the academic performance between two groups of students. The data analysis indicated a significant difference in the academia between Group 1, students enrolled in the program (Experimental Group) and Group 2, students not enrolled in the program (Control Group). The academic comparison between both sampling groups of students was based on their performance on the following: High School Placement Test (HSPT), Science Grade Point Average (honors biology, honors chemistry, honors physics, AP biology, AP chemistry, AP physics, and AP environmental science), overall Grade Point Average (GPA), and standardized test (SAT and ACT scores). The supporting statistical data analysis included pairwise comparison (Table 11) which when examined revealed group differences on each of the three dependent measures. Pairwise comparison revealed that the Overall GPA for Experimental group (N = 95, M = 3.77, SD = 0.18), was about .273 times higher in average GPA than the Control group (N = 170, M = 3.50, SD = 0.332) and statistically significant, p < .001 with a large effect size, Cohen's D = .947. Pairwise comparison examined the Science GPA and revealed that for Experimental group (N = 95, M = 3.33, SD = 0.466), was about .792 times higher in average Science GPA than the Control group (N = 170, M = 2.538, SD = 0.864) and is statistically significant, p < .001 with a large effect size, Cohen's D = 1.06. A Pearson correlation tests including scatter plots (Figure 3) with a 95% Bias-Corrected bootstrap to improve estimation of the sample distribution were conducted to investigate the measure of association between the observed Motivation scale and the three learning programs in GPA, HSPT, and Science GPA. The results indicated that the bivariate relationship between the Motivation and GPA were negatively correlated and statistically significant, r(60) = -.252, p = .048 with a substandard post-hoc observed power of .64 or 64% detection rate.;The collection of qualitative data in the form of on-line surveys came from students and health care professional. The on-line surveys included open-end questions and analyzed using a modified version of the Academic Motivational Scale (AMS) and based on the Likert 5-point scale.;The findings of the study showed the influential efficacy of the motivational program, Project A- PulseRTM, and the causal relationship between the high school motivational program and student performance.;The ultimate outcome from the study would be to implement similar programs into high schools across the United States and for program graduates to choose to enter careers in the health sciences or medical field.;Keywords: Academic Education, Assessment, Career Education, Core Curriculum, Health Sciences, High School Graduates, High School Students, Magnet Schools, Motivation, Outcomes of Program, Program Effectiveness, Project A- Pulse, Science and Math Curriculum, STEM, Student Success.
机译:这项研究的目的是确定针对高中生设计的课程是否被证明是影响学生表现的总体结果中具有统计学意义的动机因素。文献综述支持两个关键论点,说明为何有必要集中精力在高中年龄段。最初的目标集中在动机及其在学生学习过程中所扮演的角色。第二种观点确定了高中医学课程是否在以下方面激励学生超越同龄人:专门针对健康科学的知识程度,询问基础学习和批判性思维技能。该研究提出的研究问题和假设在统计上得到支持,结果证实了激励计划对学生的表现有直接影响和积极影响。;用于研究的方法包括混合的定量-定性,纵向队列设计。采用纵向队列方法的合理性归因于研究人员在5年的持续时间内深入研究了激励计划并收集了详细的信息。该研究比较了两组学生的学习成绩。数据分析表明,第1组的学生(参加该计划的学生)(实验组)与第2组的学生未参加该计划的学生(对照组)之间的学术差异显着。两组学生之间的学术比较是基于他们在以下方面的表现:高中分班考试(HSPT),科学平均绩点(荣誉生物学,荣誉化学,荣誉物理学,AP生物学,AP化学,AP物理和AP环境科学),总体平均绩点(GPA)和标准化考试(SAT和ACT分数)。支持性的统计数据分析包括成对比较(表11),该比较在检查时揭示了三个相关度量中每个度量的组差异。配对比较显示,实验组的总GPA(N = 95,M = 3.77,SD = 0.18)比对照组(N = 170,M = 3.50,SD = 0.332)平均GPA高约0.273倍。且具有统计学意义,p <.001,且影响大小较大,Cohen D = .947。配对比较检查了科学GPA,发现实验组(N = 95,M = 3.33,SD = 0.466)的平均科学GPA约为对照组(N = 170,M = 2.538,SD的.792倍= 0.864),且具有统计学意义,p <.001,且效应大小较大,Cohen D = 1.06。进行了Pearson相关测试,包括散点图(图3)和95%的Bias-Corrected引导程序,以改善对样本分布的估计,以研究观察到的动机量度与GPA,HSPT和GPA中三个学习程序之间的关联性度量。科学GPA。结果表明,动机与GPA之间的双变量关系是负相关的,并且具有统计学显着性,r(60)= -.252,p = .048,事后观察的观察力为.64或64%。以在线调查形式收集的定性数据来自学生和医疗保健专业人员。在线调查包括开放性问题,并使用李克特五分制量表的学术动机量表(AMS)的改进版进行了分析;研究结果表明,动机项目的影响力是有效的。 A- PulseRTM,以及高中激励计划与学生表现之间的因果关系;该研究的最终结果将是在美国各地的高中实施类似的计划,并让计划的毕业生选择进入健康职业科学或医学领域。关键词:学术教育,评估,职业教育,核心课程,健康科学,高中毕业生,高中学生,磁铁学校,动机,计划结果,计划效果,A-Pulse,科学和数学课程,STEM,学生成功。

著录项

  • 作者

    Cappelletti, Betty Anne.;

  • 作者单位

    Trident University International.;

  • 授予单位 Trident University International.;
  • 学科 Secondary education.;Health sciences.;Medicine.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 138 p.
  • 总页数 138
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号