首页> 外文学位 >A PHILOSOPHICAL ANALYSIS OF CONTEMPORARY ANTHROPOLOGICAL THEORY.
【24h】

A PHILOSOPHICAL ANALYSIS OF CONTEMPORARY ANTHROPOLOGICAL THEORY.

机译:当代人类学理论的哲学分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation presents a critique and analysis of the epistemological foundations, ontological assumptions, and explanatory principles of contemporary anthropological theory, as well as a critique and analysis of the social scientific and pseudoscientific alternatives to the anthropological approach. The various epistemological foundations are summarized and analyzed; epistemological responsibility is defined as the critical appeal to sense experience, logic, and authority. It is argued that falsifiability is the essential criterion of the scientific method. Scientific progress is described as the successive appearance of progressive paradigms, and techniques for the comparison and evaluation of commensurable and incommensurable paradigms are outlined and illustrated. Anthropology is defined as a science addressed to the interrelated problems of the maintenance of human life and the maintenance of human identify, whose chief virtue lies in the distinction between culturally-specific (emic) and objectively-valid (etic) approaches to knowledge of the human condition. Four contemporary anthropological paradigms--cultural determinism, cultural materialism, structuralism, and symbolic anthropology--are given detailed exposition and analysis. Cultural determinism is described as imprecise, unparsimonious, and theoretically inadequate; structuralism is described as intuitive, unverifiable, and unscientific. Cultural materialism and symbolic anthropology are described as incommensurable but complementary paradigms, both of which address significant, meaningful, and valuable questions in demonstrably scientific fashion. It is argued that paradigmatic debate in anthropology is frequently an emotive activity; detailed attention is given to the debates surrounding the image of limited good and the sacred cow of India to illustrate that argument. This study's major conclusion is that the discipline of anthropology constitutes the demonstrably best approach to the understanding and explanation of human behavior among all of the social scientific and pseudoscientific alternatives.
机译:本文对当代人类学理论的认识论基础,本体论假设和解释原理进行了批判和分析,以及对人类学方法的社会科学和伪科学选择的批判和分析。总结和分析了各种认识论基础;认识论责任被定义为感官经验,逻辑和权威的关键诉求。有论证者证伪是科学方法的基本标准。科学进步被描述为渐进范式的连续出现,并概述和说明了用于比较和评估可比较和不可比较的范例的技术。人类学被定义为一门针对人类生命维护和人类身份认同相关问题的科学,其主要美德在于对文化知识的文化特定(主位)和客观有效(主位)方法之间的区别。人类状况。给出了四种当代人类学范式-文化决定论,文化唯物论,结构主义和象征人类学-进行了详细的论述和分析。文化决定论被描述为不精确,不客气且理论上不充分;结构主义被描述为直觉,不可验证和不科学的。文化唯物主义和象征人类学被描述为不可比拟的但互补的范式,它们都以明显的科学方式解决了重大,有意义和有价值的问题。有人认为,人类学中的范式辩论通常是一种情感活动。围绕着有限善的形象和印度的圣牛的辩论得到了详细的关注,以说明这一论点。这项研究的主要结论是,在所有社会科学和伪科学选择中,人类学学科构成了对人类行为的理解和解释的最佳方法。

著录项

  • 作者

    LETT, JAMES WILLIAM, JR.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Florida.;

  • 授予单位 University of Florida.;
  • 学科 Cultural anthropology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1983
  • 页码 231 p.
  • 总页数 231
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号