首页> 外文学位 >ARCHITECTURE AND THE STATE: FASCIST ITALY AND NEW DEAL AMERICA. (VOLUMES I AND II).
【24h】

ARCHITECTURE AND THE STATE: FASCIST ITALY AND NEW DEAL AMERICA. (VOLUMES I AND II).

机译:建筑与州:法西斯意大利和新墨西哥州。 (第一和第二卷)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Historians typically regard Roosevelt's New Deal and Mussolini's Fascism as different political systems--one repressive and totalitarian, the other free and democratic. But Italy and America suffered from the Depression, and the Roosevelt Administration's building and construction campaign resembled those Benito Mussolini launched in Italy for similar reasons. Both constructed new towns, public buildings, and low-cost housing in unprecedented numbers. Only Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia engaged in such programs during the 1930s. Why did democratic America pursue programs which corresponded to those of totalitarian states? This study examines three types of public building programs and asks: how were the new town and urban public housing programs in the two countries similar and different? What political and representational goals did the public architecture serve?In purposes, methods, and types of building, New Deal programs differed little from those of Fascist Italy. Both governments directly intervened in the lives of their tenants to an unprecedented degree, and the character of the intervention in America paralleled that which occurred in Italy.Examined in conjunction with those of Fascist Italy, New Deal building and architecture programs are far more conservative, even reactionary, than historians have assumed. The Mussolini and Roosevelt administrations engaged in parallel quests for legitimation in a time of economic crisis, both chose pre-industrial rural communities as ideal social models for the future, and both cloaked their public buildings in an architecture designed to awe with its monumentality and to promote stable cultural images in a time of great uncertainty.The firs two chapters discuss the purposes and styles of public buildings both served legitimizing functions, but the architecture chosen to accomplish this differed dramatically and tellingly in the two countries. Chapters three and four evaluate the new communities programs, which involved the governments in constructing models for ideal communities of an unexpected character. Chapters five and six examine the types, sizes, styles, operation, financing and location of low-cost projects.
机译:历史学家通常将罗斯福的《新政》和墨索里尼的《法西斯主义》视为不同的政治制度,一个是压迫和极权主义,另一个是自由民主。但是意大利和美国遭受了大萧条的困扰,罗斯福政府的建筑和建造运动类似于出于类似原因在意大利发起的贝尼托·墨索里尼。两者都以前所未有的数量建造了新的城镇,公共建筑和廉价住房。在1930年代,只有纳粹德国和苏维埃俄罗斯参与了此类计划。民主美国为什么要推行与极权国家相对应的计划?这项研究考察了三种类型的公共建筑计划,并提出:两国的新城镇和城市公共住房计划有何相似之处和不同之处?公共建筑服务于哪些政治和代表性目标?在建筑的目的,方法和类型上,新政计划与法西斯意大利的计划几乎没有什么不同。两国政府都以前所未有的程度直接干预了租户的生活,美国的干预措施与意大利的干预措施相类似。与法西斯意大利一起审查,新政建筑和建筑计划要保守得多,甚至比历史学家所设想的反动。墨索里尼(Mussolini)和罗斯福(Roosevelt)政权在经济危机时期积极地寻求合法化,都选择了工业化前的农村社区作为未来的理想社会模式,并且将其公共建筑掩盖在对其巨大的纪念性敬畏中的建筑中。在不确定的时期促进稳定的文化形象。前两章讨论了既具有合法功能的公共建筑的目的和风格,但为实现这一目标而选择的建筑在两国之间截然不同。第三章和第四章评估了新的社区计划,其中涉及政府为具有意外特征的理想社区构建模型。第五章和第六章探讨了低成本项目的类型,规模,风格,运营,融资和位置。

著录项

  • 作者

    GHIRARDO, DIANE YVONNE.;

  • 作者单位

    Stanford University.;

  • 授予单位 Stanford University.;
  • 学科 History United States.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1983
  • 页码 597 p.
  • 总页数 597
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号