首页> 外文学位 >ECONOMIC HISTORY AND THE THEORY OF PRIMITIVE SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT.
【24h】

ECONOMIC HISTORY AND THE THEORY OF PRIMITIVE SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT.

机译:经济历史和原始社会经济发展理论。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation analyzes and critiques Marxist and non-Marxist economic history, in which primitive societies are treated as devoid of history and development. The dissertation argues that in both Marxist and non-Marxist historical writing, the treatment of primitive societies as lacking an historical dynamic is linked to the use of various kinds of essentialist and teleological discourses. Chapter I is a critical presentation of the forms of writing, such as historical narrative and realism, employed by historians and social scientists who produce these discourses. This chapter begins to present the concepts of an anti-essentialist Marxist discourse, as developed by Althusser, Hindess and Hirst, and Resnick and Wolff, in contradistinction to essentialist and teleological discourses. Chapter I argues that an anti-essentialist Marxism, with the concepts of class and over-determination as its entry point, can produce concepts of primitive history and development. Chapter II continues the presentation of basic concepts, such as necessary and surplus labor, fundamental and subsumed class processes and positions, social formation, overdetermination, transition, and development, that comprise an anti-essentialist Marxist discourse. Chapter III reviews and critiques the Marxist concept of primitive communism frequently used to analyze the socio-economic structure of primitive societies. Chapter III shows how most writing on primitive communism treats primitive communism as a signifier for the absence of history and development, as a discursive representation of the concept of historical origins and/or ends, and as a social scientific type in which "primitivism" is the central defining characteristic. These treatments, exemplified in the works of Anderson, Godelier, Hindess and Hirst, Leacock, Rey, and others, make problematic the theorization of primitive history and development. By contrast, Marx's treatment of "pre-capitalist forms of the commune" in the Grundrisse provides the basis for an alternative formulation of primitive communism produced with the concepts primitive communal fundamental and subsumed class processes and non-class processes and overdetermination. Through the use of these concepts, Marx's presentation in the Grundrisse can be read as a demonstration of how an anti-essentialist Marxism theorizes history and socio-economic development in primitive societies.
机译:本文对马克思主义和非马克思主义的经济史进行了分析和批判,其中原始社会被视为缺乏历史和发展。论文认为,在马克思主义和非马克思主义的历史著作中,原始社会缺乏历史动态的对待都与使用各种本质论和目的论话语有关。第一章是批判性地介绍了产生这些话语的历史学家和社会科学家所采用的写作形式,例如历史叙事和现实主义。本章开始介绍由阿尔都塞,欣德斯和赫斯特以及雷斯尼克和沃尔夫提出的反本质主义马克思主义话语的概念,与本质论和目的论话语相矛盾。第一章认为,反阶级的马克思主义以阶级和过分确定的观念为切入点,可以产生原始历史和发展的观念。第二章继续介绍基本概念,例如必要和多余的劳动,基本的和被包容的阶级进程和职位,社会形成,过分确定,过渡和发展,其中包括反本质主义的马克思主义话语。第三章回顾并批判了经常用于分析原始社会的社会经济结构的马克思主义原始共产主义概念。第三章显示了大多数关于原始共产主义的著作如何将原始共产主义视为缺乏历史和发展的象征,作为历史起源和/或目的概念的话语表述以及作为“原始主义”的社会科学类型。中心定义特征。这些处理方法在安德森,戈德利尔,欣德斯和赫斯特,莱科克,雷伊和其他人的著作中得到了体现,这使原始历史和发展的理论化成为问题。相比之下,马克思对格兰代斯的“前资本主义形式的公社”的处理,为原始共产主义的另一种表述奠定了基础,而原始共产主义则是用原始的公共基本和被包容的阶级进程,非阶级进程和超决定主义的概念产生的。通过使用这些概念,马克思在《基本原理》中的演讲可以被看作是反马克思主义马克思主义如何理论化原始社会的历史和社会经济发展的例证。

著录项

  • 作者

    AMARIGLIO, JACK LEON.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Massachusetts Amherst.;

  • 授予单位 University of Massachusetts Amherst.;
  • 学科 Economic history.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1984
  • 页码 434 p.
  • 总页数 434
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号