首页> 外文学位 >FROM TRUMAN TO JOHNSON: AD HOC POLICY FORMULATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION.
【24h】

FROM TRUMAN TO JOHNSON: AD HOC POLICY FORMULATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION.

机译:从特鲁曼到约翰逊:高等教育的临时政策制定。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Between 1946-68, sixteen Presidential commissions and task forces were appointed to examine education. Relatively little is known about how these temporary groups functioned, and equally little is known about how the Presidents who appointed them responded to their recommendations. Using public and private archival collections, as well as personal interviews and correspondence with Administration officials and advisory group members, this study reconstructs the policymaking role and analyzes the policy impact of six commissions and task forces that dealt with higher education. Those examined include President Truman's 1946 Commission on Higher Education, President Eisenhower's 1956 Committee on Education Beyond the High School, President Kennedy's 1960 Task Force on Education, and three of President Johnson's "secret" task forces, the 1966 Interagency Task Force, the 1966-67 Outside Task Force, and the 1967 Interagency Task Force.; The specific objectives of the investigation include: (1) tracing the process by which task force or commission recommendations were formulated and reviewed; (2) identifying the participants in and their impact upon this process and the results it reached; (3) determining whether recommendations of the task force or commission were included as part of the Administration's legislative program, and whether they became law; (4) explaining, as fully as the archival and other evidence allows, why some recommendations were embraced by the White House while others were rejected.; The study's findings indicate that in numerous instances the impact of a commission or task force has been underestimated, inaccurately characterized, or overlooked in discussions of Presidential policy formulation in higher education. Each of the panels directly influenced policy initiatives that were proposed by the White House to Congress. A number of the advisory groups' recommendations were enacted in legislation, including the National Defense Education Act, amendments to the NDEA, and the 1968 Higher Education Amendments.
机译:在1946-68年间,任命了16个总统委员会和工作队来审查教育。关于这些临时小组的运作情况知之甚少,而任命他们的总统如何回应其建议也知之甚少。本研究使用公共和私人档案馆藏,以及与政府官员和咨询小组成员的私人访谈和来信,重构了政策制定角色,并分析了涉及高等教育的六个委员会和工作组的政策影响。审查对象包括杜鲁门总统1946年的高等教育委员会,艾森豪威尔总统1956年的中学教育委员会,肯尼迪总统1960年的教育工作队以及约翰逊总统的三个“秘密”工作队,1966年机构间工作队,1966- 67外部工作队和1967年机构间工作队。调查的具体目标包括:(1)追踪制定和审查工作组或委员会建议的过程; (2)确定参与者及其对这一过程及其所产生结果的影响; (3)确定是否将工作队或委员会的建议包括在政府的立法计划中,以及它们是否成为法律; (4)在档案和其他证据允许的范围内,充分解释为何白宫接受了一些建议而其他建议却被拒绝。该研究结果表明,在许多情况下,委员会或工作组的影响在高等教育中总统政策制定的讨论中被低估,不准确地描述或被忽略了。每个小组都直接影响了白宫向国会提出的政策倡议。立法中颁布了许多咨询小组的建议,包括《国防教育法》,对《国家教育发展法案》的修正案和《 1968年高等教育修正案》。

著录项

  • 作者

    KERR-TENER, JANET CECILE.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Virginia.;

  • 授予单位 University of Virginia.;
  • 学科 Education Higher.; Political Science Public Administration.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1985
  • 页码 485 p.
  • 总页数 485
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 高等教育;政治理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号