首页> 外文学位 >SPIRITUALIZING THE CRUSADE: DAVID JORIS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE EARLY REFORM AND ANABAPTIST MOVEMENTS IN THE NETHERLANDS, 1524-1543.
【24h】

SPIRITUALIZING THE CRUSADE: DAVID JORIS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE EARLY REFORM AND ANABAPTIST MOVEMENTS IN THE NETHERLANDS, 1524-1543.

机译:专门化团队:戴维·乔里斯(David Joris)在1524-1543年间在荷兰的早期改革和动静运动的背景下。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation contributes to a scholarly understanding of the important role played by David Joris in the early Dutch Sacramentarian and Anabaptist movements between 1524 and 1542.;It was within this complex matrix of spiritual and practical turmoil that David Joris sought to invigorate the flagging hopes of perplexed Anabaptists. While Joris was typical of Dutch radical reformers in his odyssey from Sacramentarianism to Anabaptism, the punishment he received at the hands of the authorities as an early reformer (1528) helped to forge his uniquely cautious Anabaptist stance and may partially explain both his early and continued opposition to the violent tactics of radical groups and his theology of inwardness. Joris, however, attempted to reach a compromise agreement with the remaining Munsterites and Melchiorites and to unify all of Dutch Anabaptism under his charismatic leadership. To do so he offered radical Anabaptists enough continuity with past beliefs and hoped to provide them an avenue to maintain their reform zeal and at the same time lay down their weapons.;Joris, by his attempts to unite the fragmented Anabaptist movement and by his success at gaining a large and devout following, became the most important Anabaptist leaders in the Netherlands for the half-decade following the defeat of the Munster kingdom in 1535. Joris' support came largely from artisans who had joined the Anabaptist movement earlier and who found his religion of internal exile more appropriate for remaining in the urban centres of the Netherlands than the sectarian option presented by Menno Simons.;Worsening economic crises, increasing persecution and the general inability of moderate Sacramentarian leaders to achieve major reforms made the more radical restitutio program of Melchior Hoffman readily acceptable to a significant segment of urbanites by the time of his preaching campaign in Emden in 1530. Reform hopes were transformed into attempts to establish the eschatalogical kingdom in various urban centres such as Munster, Amsterdam and Strasbourg. With the failure of these radical experiments to reform society, many Anabaptists--the majority of whom were urban artisans--became disillusioned and found themselves displaced from both their homes and means of livelihood.
机译:这篇论文有助于学者对戴维·乔里斯在1524年至1542年间的早期荷兰圣礼和反洗礼运动中所扮演的重要角色的理解;戴维·乔里斯试图在这种精神和实践动荡的复杂矩阵内,激发人们的of旗息鼓的希望。困惑的再洗礼。约里斯(Joris)是从激进主义到再洗礼的典型荷兰激进改革家,但他作为早期改革家(1528)在当局手中受到的惩罚有助于树立他谨慎的再洗礼立场,并可能在一定程度上解释了他的早期和继续反对激进团体的暴力策略及其内在神学。然而,乔里斯(Joris)试图与其余的芒斯特人(Munsterites)和梅尔奇奥里人(Melchiorite)达成妥协协议,并在他的超凡魅力的领导下统一荷兰的所有洗礼。为此,他为激进的洗礼信徒提供了与过去信仰足够的连续性,并希望为他们提供一种维持改革热情并同时放下武器的途径。乔里斯,通过他试图团结零散的洗礼运动并取得成功在获得大量和虔诚的支持之后,成为1535年明斯特王国失败后半个十年来荷兰最重要的洗礼领袖。约里斯的支持主要来自较早加入洗礼运动的工匠,他发现了与门诺·西蒙斯(Menno Simons)提出的宗派主义选择相比,内部流亡宗教更适合留在荷兰的城市中心;经济危机的加剧,迫害的增加以及萨克拉门派温和派领导人普遍无力实现重大改革,使得该计划更加激进。在宣讲运动之时,梅尔基奥尔·霍夫曼(Melchior Hoffman)早已为大部分城市人所接受1530年在埃姆登(Emden)成立。改革的希望变成了在各个城市中心(例如明斯特,阿姆斯特丹和史特拉斯堡)建立末世王国的尝试。由于这些激进的实验未能改革社会,许多再洗礼主义者(其中大多数是城市手工艺者)幻灭了,发现自己流离失所,失去了家园和谋生手段。

著录项

  • 作者

    WAITE, GARY KEITH.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Waterloo (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Waterloo (Canada).;
  • 学科 History European.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1986
  • 页码 273 p.
  • 总页数 273
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号