首页> 外文学位 >THE PSYCHOLOGY OF THE 'LAST MAN': COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY AND MODERN NIHILISM
【24h】

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF THE 'LAST MAN': COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY AND MODERN NIHILISM

机译:“最后一个人”的心理学:认知心理学和现代尼希拉主义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The tendency in cognitive psychology is to identify cognition with computational process and then to use these processes to explain our "competence" in perception, language comprehension, and other mental activities. In describing this tendency, I provide a historical sketch of cognitive psychology and a sustained critical examination of representative texts in that field. This critical examination reveals that cognitive psychology accounts for our cognitive competence only by tacitly appealing to a non-computational and more basic intimacy between subjects and their milieu. Thus cognitive psychology undermines its own account of cognitive competence and mental activity.;I also show that cognitive psychology's appeal to independent support from scientific method for its theories is circular, and that the experimental results of cognitive psychology are artefacts of the experimental tasks and situation rather than indicators of a universal, computational form of cognition.;Utilizing clues from both cognitive psychology and phenomenology, I characterize the underlying intimacy between subjects and their milieu in terms of "social discourse." Besides mediating between members of the linguistic community and their surroundings, social discourse establishes an intrinsic relation between mental activities and their objects, thereby accounting for our cognitive competence.;I also demonstrate that social discourse is reciprocally related to "voices" and "images." In modern society, these voices are progressively reduced to a monological system or code, images to a set of technical problems, and creativity to the endless intervention of more such problems in order to keep this "technocratic rationality or logos" in circuit and hegemonic in modern society. Because cognitive psychology depicts the mind as a set of computational processes, that is, as a "proto-technocrat," it is both a product and a promoter of the domination of modern society by technocratic rationality, that is, by what Nietzsche called "passive nihilism" and the "last man." Challenging cognitive psychology's view of mind is one of the tactics required for incorporating technocratic rationality within an ascending "transfigurative rationality" and thereby reestablishing a "creative tension of voices and an open play of images.".
机译:认知心理学的趋势是通过计算过程来识别认知,然后使用这些过程来解释我们在感知,语言理解和其他心理活动方面的“能力”。在描述这种趋势时,我提供了认知心理学的历史速写和对该领域代表性文本的持续批判性检查。这项批判性的检查表明,认知心理学仅通过默认地吸引对象及其环境之间的一种非计算性和更基本的亲密关系来解释我们的认知能力。因此,认知心理学破坏了其对认知能力和心理活动的解释。;我还表明,认知心理学对其理论寻求科学方法的独立支持的吸引力是循环的,并且认知心理学的实验结果是实验任务和情况的伪像。而不是普遍的,计算形式的认知指标。;利用来自认知心理学和现象学的线索,我用“社会话语”来描述受试者与其环境之间的潜在亲密关系。社会话语除了在语言社区的成员与其周围环境之间进行调解外,还建立了心理活动与其对象之间的内在联系,从而解释了我们的认知能力。我还证明了社会话语与“声音”和“图像”相互相关。 ”在现代社会中,这些声音逐渐被简化为单一的系统或代码,图像被简化为一系列技术问题,而创造力则被无休止地干预了更多此类问题,以使这种“技术官僚理性或徽标”在电路和霸权中得以保留。现代社会。因为认知心理学将思想描述为一组计算过程,即“原始技术专家”,所以它既是技术专家理性的产物,又是对现代社会统治的推动者,即尼采所说的“被动虚无主义”和“最后的人”。挑战认知心理学的心态是将技术官僚理性纳入提升的“变形理性”并由此重新建立“声音的创造性张力和图像的开放性”所需要的策略之一。

著录项

  • 作者

    EVANS, FREDERICK JAMES.;

  • 作者单位

    State University of New York at Stony Brook.;

  • 授予单位 State University of New York at Stony Brook.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1986
  • 页码 411 p.
  • 总页数 411
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号