首页> 外文学位 >PROPERTY TAXATION IN LOCAL FINANCE: DIFFERENCES IN THE TAX PRICE BETWEEN RENTERS AND OWNER-OCCUPANTS.
【24h】

PROPERTY TAXATION IN LOCAL FINANCE: DIFFERENCES IN THE TAX PRICE BETWEEN RENTERS AND OWNER-OCCUPANTS.

机译:地方财政的财产税:企业与所有者之间的税收价格差异。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Renters demand higher levels of local public goods and services than owner-occupants. I suggest the institutional features of the rental housing market create a substantial delay in shifting the property tax bill from landowners to renters and thus reduce the effective tax price to renters.;To test the model, I use cross-sectional data to determine the pattern of shifting changes in property tax bills from landowners to renters. The gross rent for a standard dwelling in each city is regressed on the current and lagged property tax bills (and other variables to control for differences between jurisdictions). The gross rent variable is calculated using hedonic analysis following the work of Malpezzi, Ozanne, and Thibodeau. I use their data for 1974, 1975, and 1976, and use their methodology with information from the Annual Housing Survey to develop comparable data for 1977 to 1980. The property tax variables are calculated for each city in the sample using tax collections, assessed values and assessment ratios.;My hypotheses are: (1) None of the property tax bill is shifted. (2) All of the tax bill is shifted immediately. (3) All of the property tax bill is shifted over time. Using the coefficients from the cross-sectional regression, I was able to reject all three hypotheses. A fourth hypothesis of delayed shifting was tested and could not be rejected.;My conclusion is that the property tax bill is shifted from landowners to renters with a lag, and is not completely shifted over time.;In the model, renters maximize utility over two periods. In the first period, renters benefit from increased services but do not pay the entire property tax bill. As a result of the lag between receiving the benefits and paying the whole tax bill, there is a transfer from landowners to renters. This transfer lowers the effective tax price and thus causes an increase in the quantity demanded.
机译:房客比房主要求更高水平的当地公共产品和服务。我建议租赁住房市场的制度特征会大大延迟将财产税法案从土地所有者转移到承租人,从而降低向承租人的有效税收价格。为了测试模型,我使用截面数据来确定模式将财产税法案的变更从土地所有者转移到租户。每个城市的标准住宅的总租金根据当前和滞后的财产税法案(以及其他变量来控制辖区之间的差异)进行回归。总租金变量是根据享乐主义分析,根据马尔佩齐(Malpezzi),奥桑(Ozanne)和锡伯杜(Thibodeau)的工作计算的。我使用他们的1974、1975和1976年数据,并使用他们的方法与年度住房调查中的信息来开发1977年至1980年的可比数据。财产税变量是使用税收,评估值为样本中的每个城市计算的我的假设是:(1)财产税单没有转移。 (2)所有税单立即转移。 (3)所有财产税单都随时间推移。使用横截面回归的系​​数,我能够拒绝所有三个假设。对延迟转移的第四个假设进行了检验,不能被拒绝。;我的结论是,财产税法案从滞后转移到了土地所有者,并没有随着时间的推移而完全转移。两个时期。在第一阶段,房客受益于增加的服务,但没有支付全部的财产税。由于领取补助金和支付全部税款之间存在时间差,因此从土地所有者向承租人转移。这种转移降低了有效税价,从而导致所需数量的增加。

著录项

  • 作者

    ROCHE, ELLEN PATRICIA.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Maryland, College Park.;

  • 授予单位 University of Maryland, College Park.;
  • 学科 Finance.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1986
  • 页码 175 p.
  • 总页数 175
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号