首页> 外文学位 >SELF-CONSCIOUS FICTION AND LITERARY THEORY: DAVID LODGE, B. S. JOHNSON, AND JOHN FOWLES (METAFICTION, NARRATOLOGY, POSTMODERNISM).
【24h】

SELF-CONSCIOUS FICTION AND LITERARY THEORY: DAVID LODGE, B. S. JOHNSON, AND JOHN FOWLES (METAFICTION, NARRATOLOGY, POSTMODERNISM).

机译:自觉虚构和文学理论:戴维·罗杰,B·S·约翰逊和约翰·福尔斯(交往,叙事学,后现代主义)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Self-conscious fiction, or metafiction, is generally regarded as an anti-mimetic mode of writing: reflecting its own existence as artifact, the text relinquishes its claims to function as a mirror to the world. Such a view, however, is based on a naive theory of realism discredited by modern literary theory. The text does not become less mimetic through its increased self-involvement; nor does the realistic mode exclude textual self-reflection. Metafiction is not a postmodern phenomenon; it has been present as a latent dimension ever since narrative fiction itself came into existence. The contemporary emphasis on textual self-consciousness may be better explained in terms of a politics of reading: the current involvement with literary theory favours a mode of reception which seeks out the theoretical aspect of creative as well as critical writing.; In the case of postmodern fiction, the foregrounding of literary-theoretical concerns functions as a major influence at the level of production as well as at the reception stage. The contemporary writer of metafiction is in most cases a member of, or working in close contact with, academic institutions, and the preoccupations of the academy are echoed by a strong metatheoretical tendency in his/her writing.; This thesis takes for its object of analysis a series of texts belonging to the contemporary British tradition. This tradition, it has often been argued, is distinguished by its close involvement with the mimetic mode, less popular with the more "experimental" types of self-conscious fiction practised in continental Europe and in the U.S. The metafictional theorising of the English novel is primarily concerned to examine the mechanisms which allow us to naturalise fictional narratives according to a representational mode. The main articulations of this study are intended to reflect some of the theoretical concerns central to a "metamimetic" inquiry: the role of the author and the question of authority; the relationship between reality and the literary artifact; the basic structures for a narratological analysis of the text. The authors and texts have been chosen for the wide range of their self-conscious investigation, and for their direct involvement with literary-theoretical issues.
机译:自觉小说或元小说通常被认为是一种反模仿的写作方式:通过反映自己作为人工制品的存在,文本放弃了其作为世界镜子的主张。然而,这种观点是基于现代文学理论所disc弃的朴素的现实主义理论。通过增加自身的参与度,文本不会变得越来越模仿。现实模式也不排除文本的自我反省。元小说不是后现代的现象。自叙事小说本身诞生以来,它就一直是一个潜在的维度。当代的对文本自我意识的强调可以用阅读政治来更好地解释:当前文学理论的介入有利于一种接受方式,这种方式寻求创造性和批判性写作的理论方面。在后现代小说的情况下,文学理论关注的前景在生产水平和接受阶段都起着重要的作用。当代的超小说作家在大多数情况下是学术机构的成员,或者与之紧密联系,并且他的写作中强烈的超理论倾向呼应了学院的专注。本文以分析为目的,以一系列属于当代英国传统的文本为研究对象。经常有人争辩说,这种传统以模仿模式的密切参与而著称,而在欧洲大陆和美国实践的“实验性”自觉小说类型却不那么流行。英语小说的元小说理论是主要关注于研究使我们能够根据代表模式将小说叙事自然化的机制。本研究的主要目的是反映一些对“拟态”研究至关重要的理论问题:作者的角色和权威问题;现实与文学作品之间的关系;文本叙事分析的基本结构。选择作者和文章是因为他们进行了广泛的自我意识研究,并直接参与了文学理论问题。

著录项

  • 作者

    OMMUNDSEN, WENCHE.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Melbourne (Australia).;

  • 授予单位 University of Melbourne (Australia).;
  • 学科 Literature English.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1986
  • 页码 355 p.
  • 总页数 355
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 I561;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:51:02

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号