首页> 外文学位 >Peer influence and moral decision-making in undergraduate cliques.
【24h】

Peer influence and moral decision-making in undergraduate cliques.

机译:大学生群体中的同伴影响力和道德决策。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Of the factors influencing the development of the 18-21 year old traditional college student, once in college, the peer group is the most powerful. The student peer group provides a forum for sharing concerns, fears, and resentments--all feelings common during late adolescence. As undergraduates struggle with developmental tasks, the issues of conformity and peer influence can affect the choices students make. This study examined the nature of peer influence on moral decision-making among undergraduate friendship groups.;Three male and three female cliques, each consisting of four undergraduates, composed the sample for this study. Participants were interviewed individually to gain knowledge about the values and functioning of each clique. During the same interview participants were given Form A of Lawrence Kohlberg's Moral Judgment Interview (MJI) to assess their levels of moral reasoning. Within two weeks of the individual interview each clique was brought together to discuss two hypothetical dilemmas taken from Forms B and C of the MJI. The participants' levels of moral reasoning expressed during the individual interviews were compared with the levels of moral reasoning expressed during the group discussions to determine if the group setting affected the level of moral judgment. The clique discussions were evaluated to determine each participant's level of moral reasoning and rate of participation.;The analysis of the data suggest that: (1) undergraduates will consistently reason at a lower moral stage when placed in a group discussion among close friends; (2) within cliques, possession of the highest level of moral reasoning is not a requisite characteristic for clique leadership; (3) clique leadership positions are not held by persons with the lowest level of moral reasoning; (4) sustained exposure to higher moral reasoning is required for there to be advancement of moral stage following an educational intervention; (5) propinquity and shared interests are the key factors in initially drawing undergraduates into a friendship group; and (6) topics or issues that could be divisive or troublesome to group members were avoided in daily conversation to protect friendships among clique members.
机译:在影响18-21岁传统大学生发展的因素中,一旦上过大学,同龄人组是最有影响力的。学生同龄人小组提供了一个论坛,可以分享关注,恐惧和怨恨-这些都是青春期后期的普遍感受。随着本科生在发展任务中的挣扎,顺应性和同伴影响力会影响学生的选择。本研究探讨了同伴对大学生友谊团体之间的道德决策影响的性质。本研究的样本包括三个男性和三个女性团体,每个团体由四个本科生组成。与会人员分别接受采访,以了解每个集团的价值观和职能。在同一次采访中,参与者获得了劳伦斯·科尔伯格的道德判断访谈(MJI)的表格A,以评估他们的道德推理水平。在每次面试的两周内,每个集团聚集在一起,讨论了来自MJI表格B和C的两个假设困境。将参与者在个人访谈中表达的道德推理水平与小组讨论中表达的道德推理水平进行比较,以确定小组设置是否影响道德判断水平。对小组讨论进行了评估,以确定每个参与者的道德推理水平和参与率。数据分析表明:(1)大学生在密友之间进行小组讨论时,会始终以较低的道德阶段进行推理; (2)在集团内部,拥有最高水平的道德推理并不是集团领导的必要特征; (3)道德推理水平最低的人不担任集团领导职务; (4)在教育干预后要提高道德水平,就需要持续暴露于更高的道德推理之下; (5)坦率和共同利益是最初将大学生吸引到友谊团体中的关键因素; (6)为了保护集团成员之间的友谊,在日常对话中避免了可能对集团成员造成分歧或麻烦的话题或问题。

著录项

  • 作者

    Adams, Paul S.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Pennsylvania.;

  • 授予单位 University of Pennsylvania.;
  • 学科 Higher education.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1987
  • 页码 190 p.
  • 总页数 190
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号