首页> 外文学位 >Labour relocation costs and the demand for protection.
【24h】

Labour relocation costs and the demand for protection.

机译:劳动力搬迁成本和保护需求。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The literature on the political economy of trade policy reveals that protection is typically granted to industries with large and underprivileged workforces which have suffered deterioration in international competitiveness, which are geographically concentrated, and which are represented by lobbies of labour and capital in political coalition. These stylized facts are inadequately treated in trade theory and endogenous protection models. Labour is generally assumed to be perfectly mobile, with the presumption that all workers benefit from an improvement in the terms of trade. To reconcile the stylized facts with theory, the specific-factors trade model is extended to incorporate two types of labour relocation cost. (i) Fixed costs, incurred either through the loss of sector-specific human capital or the absorption of real resources by labour relocation, do not easily explain the coexistence of structural adjustment and persistent demands for protection by labour groups in import-competing industries. Comparative statics results and numerical simulations suggest that under neutral conditions a rising world price of exports will benefit labour everywhere, as long as relocation costs are not very large. (ii) A further model examines the effect of a rise in the export price on regionally agglomerated industries, inducing an increasing relocation cost made endogenous to the volume of the labour flow through the operation of markets for residential land and changing costs of commuting. An export price rise can lead to an absolute fall in labour welfare in the declining sector, even while labour is mobile. Numerical simulations show that this result is robust for a range of commuting cost and technology parameter values, reconciling the reviewed stylized facts with received trade theory and forming the basis for policy suggestions and for extending an existing endogenous tariff model. Income redistribution can be effected by population density re-zoning, and first-best policy can be duplicated by relocation and production subsidies in combination. Labour incentives to demand protection are used in a voting model with costly voting to generate a tariff which hurts the majority of agents.
机译:关于贸易政策的政治经济学的文献表明,保护通常是针对拥有庞大和弱势劳动力的行业提供的,这些行业的国际竞争力下降,地域集中并且在政治联盟中以劳力和资本的游说为代表。在贸易理论和内生保护模型中,这些风格化的事实没有得到充分的对待。一般认为劳动力是完全可以流动的,前提是所有工人都可以从贸易条件的改善中受益。为了使程式化的事实与理论保持一致,特殊因素贸易模型被扩展为包含两种类型的劳动力安置成本。 (i)固定成本,是由于特定部门的人力资本的损失或由于劳动力转移而吸收的实际资源而引起的,不能轻易解释结构调整和竞争性行业在进口竞争性行业中并存和持续存在的要求。比较静态结果和数值模拟表明,在中性条件下,只要搬迁成本不是很高,世界出口价格的上涨将使各地的劳动力受益。 (ii)进一步的模型检验了出口价格上涨对区域性集聚产业的影响,从而导致通过居民用地市场的运营和通勤成本的变化,增加的搬迁成本是劳动力流量的内生因素。即使劳动力流动,出口价格上涨也可能导致正在下降的部门的劳动福利绝对下降。数值模拟表明,该结果对于一定范围的通勤成本和技术参数值具有鲁棒性,将已审查的程式化事实与公认的贸易理论相协调,并为政策建议和扩展现有内生关税模型奠定了基础。收入的重新分配可以通过人口密度的重新分区来实现,而一流的政策可以通过搬迁和生产补贴相结合来复制。在投票模型中使用了对需求保护的劳工激励措施,投票成本很高,从而产生了损害多数代理人的关税。

著录项

  • 作者

    Leger, Lawrence Arthur.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Western Ontario (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 The University of Western Ontario (Canada).;
  • 学科 Economics.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1990
  • 页码 1 p.
  • 总页数 1
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:50:37

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号