首页> 外文学位 >THE EFFECT OF CORPORATE INCOME TAX INTEGRATION ON THE DEMAND FOR RISKY STOCK (TAXATION, INVESTMENT).
【24h】

THE EFFECT OF CORPORATE INCOME TAX INTEGRATION ON THE DEMAND FOR RISKY STOCK (TAXATION, INVESTMENT).

机译:公司所得税的整合对风险股票(税收,投资)需求的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Under present U.S. law, corporate-source income is subject to a two-tier system of progressive taxation. Income is taxed first when it is earned by the corporation, and again upon its distribution to shareholders as dividends. This system of double-taxation has been criticized because it encourages corporations to favor debt over equity financing, causes a misallocation of capital between the corporate and private sectors, and impairs the competitive position of the U.S. in world markets. In addition, economic studies have suggested that progressive taxes of this nature discourage investment in new and growing firms (i.e., risky investment).; This study employed a laboratory experiment to examine the effect that reducing, or eliminating, the "double tax" on corporate profits would have on individuals' demand for risky stock. Graduate business students participated in a series of investment games which required them to allocate points between a secure and a risky stock under five different tax regimes. Demand for risky stock when there was no tax was compared to demand under the present system of taxation, one system of total integration, and two systems of partial integration. Total integration imposes no tax at the corporate level. Under partial integration, the tax rate imposed on distributed earnings at the corporate level is either zero or substantially less than the rate applicable to earnings retained by the corporation.; The results of the study support the theory that the partial integration tax regimes favor mature firms that are able to increase their dividend payout ratio. No support was found, however, for the theory that progressive taxes decrease risky investment.
机译:根据现行的美国法律,公司来源的收入受累进税两级制度的约束。公司在获得收入时首先对其征税,然后在将其作为股利分配给股东时再次征税。这种双重征税制度受到批评,因为它鼓励企业优先选择债务而不是股权融资,造成企业和私营部门之间资本的错配,并损害美国在世界市场上的竞争地位。此外,经济研究表明,这种累进税会阻碍对新兴公司和成长中公司的投资(即风险投资)。这项研究采用实验室实验来检验减少或消除对公司利润的“双重征税”对个人对风险股票的需求的影响。商科研究生参加了一系列投资游戏,要求他们在五种不同的税制下在有担保和有风险的股票之间分配积分。将没有税的情况下对有风险库存的需求与目前的税收制度,一种完全整合的制度和两种部分整合的制度下的需求进行了比较。完全集成不会对公司征收任何税。在部分整合下,对公司分配的收入征收的税率是零或大大低于对公司保留的收益适用的税率。研究结果支持以下理论:部分整合税制有利于能够提高股息派发率的成熟公司。但是,没有发现支持累进税减少风险投资的理论。

著录项

  • 作者

    SWAYZE, JAMES PRENTISS.;

  • 作者单位

    UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON.;

  • 授予单位 UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON.;
  • 学科 Business Administration Accounting.; Economics Finance.
  • 学位 PH.D.
  • 年度 1992
  • 页码 199 p.
  • 总页数 199
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 财务管理、经济核算;财政、金融;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号