首页> 外文学位 >Multiculturalism and the arts: An analysis of conceptual foundations and policy issues. (Volumes I and II)
【24h】

Multiculturalism and the arts: An analysis of conceptual foundations and policy issues. (Volumes I and II)

机译:多元文化主义与艺术:概念基础和政策问题的分析。 (第一和第二卷)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Multiculturalism is a significant issue in arts policy and arts education policy. Multiculturalism is defined as the coexistence of racial minority groups within a common socio-political system, groups that, while continually undergoing change, are seen and see themselves as having relatively unique shared and transmitted values, dispositions, behaviors, and outlooks as well as a shared economic future and that draw on the loyalty of group members to harness discontent in the face of discrimination and powerlessness as a basis for social and political action. Policies are seen as entailing actions to achieve purposes rooted in human values. This dissertation seeks to resolve policy disputes founded on value-laden concepts of multiculturalism and the arts.;One subject for study is the diverse funding systems of state arts agencies, whose many elements are analyzed. Four value issues underlying alternative policy positions emerge. (1) Cultural pluralism, comprising many views of ethnic group relations, is exposed as an inadequate basis for arts policy goals. (2) Relations of art and culture are complex in a culturally diverse society. While the creation and dissemination of ethnic art has important meanings for ethnic groups, such meaning is qualified and potentially diminished by many factors. (3) Affirmative action and arts policy are then examined. The concept of equal opportunity, in which arts agencies are to adapt affirmative measures to equalize obstacles to funding, is defended. (4) Finally, it is argued that equal opportunity is upheld only by viewing artistic value as variable by culture. Artistic value resides in the capacity of art works to induce, in qualified individuals, integrated experiences of art's aesthetic, cognitive, moral, and religious features.;State education departments and arts agencies have many policy responsibilities for arts education. These agencies' policy goals and means are analyzed revealing the unexamined assumption that discipline-based and multicultural arts education are compatible.;This assumption is explored through review of the multicultural critique of discipline-based art education. DBAE is found wanting on issues of justification, curriculum content, and pedagogy.;Finally, means for the increased effectiveness of policy research in the arts are proposed.
机译:多元文化主义是艺术政策和艺术教育政策中的重要问题。多元文化主义被定义为在一个共同的社会政治系统中种族少数群体的共存,这些群体在不断发生变化的同时被视为并具有相对独特的共享和传播的价值,性格,行为和观点,以及共同的经济未来,并利用团体成员的忠诚度来面对歧视和无能为力,将不满情绪作为社会和政治行动的基础。政策被视为需要采取行动以实现植根于人类价值观的目的。本论文旨在解决基于价值多元文化和艺术观念的政策纠纷。研究的一个课题是国家艺术机构的多元化筹资体系,分析其许多要素。出现了替代政策立场的四个价值问题。 (1)包含许多族群关系观点的文化多元主义被暴露为艺术政策目标的不足基础。 (2)在文化多元的社会中,艺术与文化的关系是复杂的。尽管民族艺术的创造和传播对民族具有重要意义,但这种意义是合格的,并可能由于许多因素而减弱。 (3)然后研究平权行动和艺术政策。捍卫平等机会的概念,艺术机构将采用平等机会措施来平息资金障碍。 (4)最后,有人认为,只有通过将艺术价值视文化而变化,才能维护机会均等。艺术价值在于艺术作品的能力,即在有资格的个人中诱导艺术的审美,认知,道德和宗教特征的综合经验。国家教育部门和艺术机构对艺术教育负有许多政策责任。对这些机构的政策目标和手段进行了分析,揭示了未经审查的假设,即基于学科的艺术教育与多元文化艺术教育是相容的。;通过审查基于学科的艺术教育的多元文化批评来探索这一假设。发现DBAE缺乏正当性,课程内容和教学法等问题。最后,提出了提高艺术政策研究有效性的方法。

著录项

  • 作者

    Pankratz, David Barclay.;

  • 作者单位

    The Ohio State University.;

  • 授予单位 The Ohio State University.;
  • 学科 Art education.;Fine arts.;Social structure.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1992
  • 页码 610 p.
  • 总页数 610
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号