首页> 外文学位 >A response to M. B. Foster's critique of Hegel's political thought.
【24h】

A response to M. B. Foster's critique of Hegel's political thought.

机译:回应福斯特(M. B. Foster)对黑格尔政治思想的批评。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Michael Beresford Foster's book The Political Philosophies of Plato and Hegel crystallizes much of the criticism which liberal theorists direct against Hegel's political philosophy. In its grasp of the various trends which develop in the course of twentieth century liberalism, Foster's work is, in fact, remarkable. His criticism brings to light the important relationship between liberalism and the "event theory" of action and history. Through writings from Oakeshott to Rorty this relationship has been developed and in Foster's work it appears vividly contrasted with Hegel's views or, more accurately, with a liberal caricature of his views. Foster's work is also remarkable in that, although he brings interesting questions to Hegel's political thought, his criticism thoroughly misrepresents Hegel's argument, merely thrusting a dualistic perspective of his own upon Hegel's dialectical standpoint. As a result he is insensitive to the subtle relationships which Hegel develops, for example, between desire and reason, individual and state, freedom and history, and history and eternity. In every instance Foster assumes the radical separation of these concepts, all the while failing adequately to criticize Hegel's attempts to reconcile their apparent opposition. On the basis of this method Foster resolves that Hegel's political thought is "confused" and results in a totalitarian repression of individual freedom.;The burden of this thesis is to disentangle Hegel's actual argument from the snarl which Foster creates. To this end I show the dialectical relationships which Hegel establishes between such concepts as "real" and "ideal"; freedom and authority; and state and history. The essential point of this analysis is to show that, for Hegel, all socio-political institutions are in principle manifestations of human freedom. Consequently, I hope to show that the claim that Hegel's political thought develops an authoritarian and repressive state does not hold water.
机译:迈克尔·贝雷斯福德·福斯特(Michael Beresford Foster)的著作《柏拉图与黑格尔的政治哲学》体现了自由主义理论家针对黑格尔的政治哲学所提出的许多批评。实际上,在掌握了二十世纪自由主义的各种趋势之后,福斯特的工作是了不起的。他的批评揭示了自由主义与行动和历史的“事件理论”之间的重要关系。通过从奥克肖特(Oakeshott)到罗蒂(Rorty)的著作,这种关系得到了发展,在福斯特(Foster)的作品中,它似乎与黑格尔的观点形成鲜明对比,或更准确地说,与黑格尔的观点形成鲜明对比。福斯特的著作也很出色,尽管他给黑格尔的政治思想带来了有趣的问题,但他的批评却完全歪曲了黑格尔的论点,只是在黑格尔的辩证立场上提出了自己的二元论观点。结果,他对黑格尔所发展的微妙关系不敏感,例如,在欲望与理性,个人与国家,自由与历史,历史与永恒之间建立了微妙的关系。在每种情况下,福斯特都假定这些概念是根本性的分离,但始终未能充分批评黑格尔为调和其明显的对立所作的努力。在这种方法的基础上,福斯特断定黑格尔的政治思想是“混乱的”,并导致对个人自由的极权主义镇压。;本论文的责任是使黑格尔的实际论点与福斯特造成的咆哮区分开来。为此,我展示了黑格尔在“真实”和“理想”等概念之间建立的辩证关系。自由与权威;以及州和历史。该分析的重点是表明,对于黑格尔而言,所有社会政治制度原则上都是人类自由的体现。因此,我希望表明,关于黑格尔的政治思想发展了专制和压迫性国家的说法不会成立。

著录项

  • 作者

    Peddle, David Gerard.;

  • 作者单位

    Memorial University of Newfoundland (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 Memorial University of Newfoundland (Canada).;
  • 学科 Philosophy.
  • 学位 M.A.
  • 年度 1992
  • 页码 85 p.
  • 总页数 85
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 普通生物学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号