首页> 外文学位 >'Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude': Free labor and American law, ca. 1815-1880.
【24h】

'Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude': Free labor and American law, ca. 1815-1880.

机译:“既不是奴隶制也不是非自愿的奴役”:自由劳工和美国法律,ca。 1815-1880年。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Most nineteenth-century northerners did not see legal control of the employment relation or the labor market as contradictory with the free labor ethic. Antebellum work discipline rested on statutory and common law rules, the most important of which regulated labor contracts and proscribed vagrancy. With regard to work discipline, labor contracts crystallized the relationship of workers to individual employers, while vagrancy statutes defined the meaning of work in the community at large. Equally important, these legal principles helped construct gender, class structure, and social theory.; Before the Civil War, northern courts adapted labor contract rules to specific modes of production, and by 1860 jurists and law writers formulated two opposing conceptions of law's place in work discipline. Vagrancy laws in the antebellum North served many functions. While labor discipline was the ultimate effect, these statutes expressed ideas about class, gender, and republicanism. Antebellum southerners developed a separate legal tradition, especially in the area of contract law.; During the transition from slavery to free labor, antebellum contract and vagrancy laws influenced both emerging systems of labor, such as the Union army's program in Louisiana, and the constitutional meaning of freedom in the Thirteenth Amendment. Similarly, prewar labor law configured actions of the Bureau of Refugees, Freedmen, and Abandoned Lands. As the case of Alabama shows, labor law was manipulated at times to secure rights for African-American workers, but it faltered because of resistance by southern whites and because of its basis in class. The Freedmen's Bureau's labor program also failed because of the ways in which local agents interpreted and administered antebellum legal principles, as occurred in South Carolina. In places such as Texas, bureau officials used labor law to oppress African-American workers, but both black and white Southerners manipulated legal restraints to their own advantage.; By 1880 free labor law left its antebellum roots. Courts removed remaining restraints on individual labor contracts, while state legislatures passed tramp acts that enhanced the law's power over the meaning of work, gender, and class.
机译:大多数19世纪的北方人并不认为对雇佣关系或劳动力市场的法律控制与自由劳动道德相矛盾。战前的工作纪律取决于成文法和普通法规则,其中最重要的是规范劳动合同和禁止流浪。关于工作纪律,劳动合同明确了工人与个体雇主的关系,而流浪法规则界定了整个社区的工作意义。同样重要的是,这些法律原则有助于构建性别,阶级结构和社会理论。在内战之前,北方法院根据具体的生产方式调整了劳动合同规则,到1860年,法学家和法律作家就法律在工作纪律中的地位提出了两种对立的概念。北部战前的流民法起着许多作用。劳动纪律是最终的影响,但这些法规表达了关于阶级,性别和共和主义的观点。以前的南方人发展出了独立的法律传统,尤其是在合同法领域。在从奴隶制向自由劳力的过渡期间,前战合同和流浪法既影响了新兴的劳力系统,如路易斯安那州的联军计划,也影响了《第十三修正案》的宪法自由。同样,战前劳动法规定了难民,自由民和被遗弃土地局的行动。如阿拉巴马州的案例所示,劳动法有时被操纵以确保非裔美国工人的权利,但由于南方白人的抵制和其阶级基础的影响,它动摇了。自由职业者局的劳工计划也失败了,原因是当地特工在南卡罗来纳州发生的解释和管理战前法律原则的方式。在得克萨斯州等地,该局官员利用劳动法来压迫非裔美国人的工人,但是黑人和白人南方人都利用法律限制来谋取自己的利益。到1880年,自由劳动法在其前庭根源。法院取消了对个人劳动合同的剩余限制,而各州立法机关通过了流氓行为,从而增强了法律对工作,性别和阶级的意义的权力。

著录项

  • 作者

    Schmidt, James D.;

  • 作者单位

    Rice University.;

  • 授予单位 Rice University.;
  • 学科 History United States.; Law.; Sociology Industrial and Labor Relations.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1992
  • 页码 448 p.
  • 总页数 448
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 美洲史;法律;社会学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号