首页> 外文学位 >Torah and scalpel: A critique of utilitarian medical ethics from a Maimonidean perspective
【24h】

Torah and scalpel: A critique of utilitarian medical ethics from a Maimonidean perspective

机译:律法和手术刀:从迈蒙尼德的角度对功利主义医学伦理学的批评

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation speaks to a number of ethical problems and issues which exist within the field of medicine, according to the perspective of Orthodox Judaism. To articulate the positions of this perspective, the project has chosen the norms, language and method(s) employed by Moses Maimonides (Moshe ibn Maimon), the foremost medical, philosophical and rabbinical figure of the Medieval period. His approach to the practice of medicine has been given the designation of Ha Shomer Akhee, which is Hebrew for "Brother's Keeper"; and under this heading, five synthetic categories have been derived to clarify the methodology and validity of the Maimonidean system of ethical medical philosophy. These categories are: (1) Primacy-of-Life, (2) Patient as Person, (3) Care of the Elderly as Applied Ethics, (4) Hedonistic vs. Statutory Pleasures, (5) Physician as Ethical Agent.;To illustrate the contemporary relevance of this undertaking, two modern-day Jewish philosophers have been incorporated both to add credence and to clarify the vernacular of their Medieval predecessor; the particular thinkers chosen are Martin Buber and Emmanuel Levinas. It is through the interworking of their respective streams of thought and an exegesis of Scriptural ethical precepts as they apply to the five synthetic categories that one systematically discovers that the historical as well as the conceptual opponent of the "Brother's Keeper" approach to medicine is found to be Utilitarianism. That is to say, the body of thought and action that is more concerned with expedience and pleasure than with what it is to be human and how to correctly care for the same. This dissertation, therefore, is also an advocacy of "Ethics as First Philosophy"; and how such a philosophy can deter and even offset the negatives found in a utilitarian approach, and thus, should be the physician's guide to medical practice. To accomplish this final end, an exegesis of the five synthetic categories employing the philosophical method used extensively by Maimonides in "The Guide," the via Negativa, will be undertaken.
机译:根据正统犹太教的观点,本文论述了医学领域中存在的许多伦理学问题。为了阐明这种观点的立场,该项目选择了中世纪时期最重要的医学,哲学和阿拉伯人物摩西·迈蒙尼德斯(Moshe ibn Maimon)使用的规范,语言和方法。他的医学实践方法被指定为Ha Shomer Akhee,希伯来语是“ Brother's Keeper”(希伯来语)。在此标题下,已经得出了五个综合类别,以阐明迈蒙尼德伦理医学哲学体系的方法论和有效性。这些类别是:(1)生命至上,(2)以人为人,(3)照料老年人作为应用伦理学,(4)享乐主义与法定快乐,(5)医师作为伦理代理。为了说明这项工作在当代的意义,已经并入了两位现代的犹太哲学家,以增加可信度并阐明其中世纪前身的乡土语言;选择的特别思想家是马丁·布伯(Martin Buber)和艾曼纽·列维纳斯(Emmanuel Levinas)。通过将他们各自的思想流和对圣经道德规范的解释应用于五种综合类别,人们系统地发现了“兄弟守护者”方法的历史和概念上的对立者。成为功利主义。就是说,思想和行动比起人类以及如何正确地关心事物,更关心权宜和愉悦。因此,本文也是对“作为第一哲学的伦理学”的提倡。以及这种哲学如何能够阻止甚至抵消功利主义方法中发现的负面因素,因此,应该成为医生的医学实践指南。为了实现这一最终目标,将采用迈蒙尼德斯在《指南》(通过Negativa)中广泛使用的哲学方法对五个合成类别进行解释。

著录项

  • 作者

    Jones, Warren Chester.;

  • 作者单位

    DePaul University.;

  • 授予单位 DePaul University.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.;Health education.;Health sciences.;Philosophy of Religion.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1993
  • 页码 355 p.
  • 总页数 355
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号