首页> 外文学位 >The perception of risk: Policy-making on infectious disease in India (1892-1940).
【24h】

The perception of risk: Policy-making on infectious disease in India (1892-1940).

机译:风险感知:印度关于传染病的决策(1892-1940年)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Long before the terms global health, biosecurity, and public health preparedness came into existence, European and colonial governments struggled to contain and prevent the spread of epidemic diseases from India to the western world. The significance of India to Europe---commercially, epidemiologically, strategically---meant that India occupied a prominent position in debates on the control of epidemic diseases throughout the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, becoming the focus of international concern and regulation. During the cholera and plague epidemics of the 1890s, the Government of India recognized that infectious disease outbreaks posed certain economic, political, and epidemiological risks. Perceptions of risk, both globally and within India, played a critical role in policy-making at the all-India level. This study analyzes how a variety of factors and assumptions---international public health diplomacy, epidemiology, trade protection, imperial governance, new medical technologies, and cultural norms---operated within larger conceptions of risk to shape the Government of India's infectious disease policies. While several factors structured policy discussions and outcomes, there were also financial, political, administrative, and ideological obstacles to the prevention and control of epidemic and endemic disease.;This study focuses on four diseases---cholera, plague, malaria, and yellow fever---and uses a case study method to make comparative analyses of policy decisions. Plague and cholera presented epidemiological, economic, and political threats to both Europe and India. Malaria was an internal public health problem, which ravaged India more than any other disease, while yellow fever was a purely external risk, which had yet to infect India. The histories of these three disease scenarios are utilized as prisms through which to analyze the Government of India's rationale for its infectious disease policies. They show the necessity of situating public health policy in India in a larger imperial and international context and demonstrate that government perceptions of economic, political, and public health risk fundamentally shaped infectious disease policies in colonial India. To understand policy development in India, archival sources and published works were consulted, including medical journals, international conventions, and published and unpublished documents of governments, international organizations, medical congresses, and scientific experts.
机译:在全球卫生,生物安全和公共卫生准备这一术语出现很久之前,欧洲和殖民地政府就努力遏制和预防流行病从印度向西方世界的传播。印度对欧洲的意义-从商业,流行病学,战略上讲-意味着印度在整个19世纪末和20世纪初在控制流行病的辩论中占据重要地位,成为国际关注和监管的焦点。在1890年代的霍乱和鼠疫流行期间,印度政府认识到传染病的爆发具有一定的经济,政治和流行病学风险。全球和印度内部的风险意识在整个印度范围内的决策中都起着至关重要的作用。这项研究分析了各种因素和假设-国际公共卫生外交,流行病学,贸易保护,帝国治理,新医疗技术和文化规范-在更大的风险概念内如何影响印度传染病政府政策。尽管有几个因素构成了政策讨论和结果,但在预防和控制流行病和地方病方面也存在财务,政治,行政和意识形态方面的障碍。;本研究的重点是四种疾病-霍乱,鼠疫,疟疾和黄色发烧---并使用案例研究方法对政策决策进行比较分析。鼠疫和霍乱对欧洲和印度都构成了流行病学,经济和政治威胁。疟疾是内部的公共卫生问题,它给印度带来的疾病比其他任何疾病都更为严重,而黄热病纯粹是外部风险,尚未感染印度。这三种疾病情景的历史被用作分析印度政府传染病政策依据的棱镜。它们显示了在更大的帝国和国际背景下在印度制定公共卫生政策的必要性,并表明政府对经济,政治和公共卫生风险的看法从根本上影响了印度殖民地的传染病政策。为了了解印度的政策发展,咨询了档案资源和已出版的著作,包括医学期刊,国际公约以及政府,国际组织,医学代表大会和科学专家的已出版和未出版的文件。

著录项

  • 作者

    Polu, Sandhya Lakshmi.;

  • 作者单位

    Harvard University.;

  • 授予单位 Harvard University.;
  • 学科 History Asia Australia and Oceania.;History Modern.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 335 p.
  • 总页数 335
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号