首页> 外文学位 >The sociology of reefer madness: The criminalization of marijuana in the United States of America.
【24h】

The sociology of reefer madness: The criminalization of marijuana in the United States of America.

机译:冷藏者疯狂的社会学:美国将大麻定为刑事犯罪。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In the United States of America, no legal sanctions against marijuana existed on the federal level until the U.S. Congress passed the Marihuana Tax Act in 1937. The social origins of this law are, in effect, a mystery. There is a lack of consensus among sociologists and historians, and no clear, concise explanation of how and why marijuana came to be criminalized in the United States. This dissertation attempts to fill that void.; In the 1930s, the Federal Bureau of Narcotics (forerunner of today's Drug Enforcement Administration) and the Hearst publishing empire framed marijuana use in the context of a violence-inducing, insanity-producing "assassin of youth." "Reefer," a slang term for a marijuana cigarette, thus came to be associated with "madness."; This dissertation provides its readers with a more comprehensive explanation of the Marihuana Tax Act than heretofore has been available. It examines the Act's passage and its subsequent enforcement in a social context, that of popular culture and historical studies of marijuana use. It develops and puts forth a new theory, the Social Control Hypothesis, of why the Marihuana Tax Act became law. It is unique in its analysis of the role that 1930s-era jazz music and anti-marijuana motion pictures played in relation to the passage and enforcement of the Marihuana Tax Act.; The historical analysis is extended to include in-depth examinations of the related, but yet distinct, issues of marijuana's decriminalization, legalization and medicalization. By comparing drug use data in the United States and Holland (the Netherlands), where cannabis use has been decriminalized, this study empirically tests and refutes the "stepping stone hypothesis" (also known as the "gateway theory"), which claims that marijuana leads the user to cocaine and heroin.; By examining the anti-marijuana media campaign of the Partnership For A Drug Free America, "The Sociology of Reefer Madness" follows the trail of Reefer Madness to the present day. It is thus demonstrated on two fronts: the medical marijuana issue and anti-marijuana media propaganda, that Reefer Madness is alive and well in the 1990s.; Extensive research for "The Sociology of Reefer Madness: the Criminalization of Marijuana in the U.S.A." was conducted at the Library of Congress in Washington, D.C. and at the National Archives in Washington, D.C. and Suitland, Maryland.
机译:在美利坚合众国,直到美国国会于1937年通过《大麻税法》之前,在联邦一级尚无针对大麻的法律制裁。实际上,该法律的社会渊源是一个谜。社会学家和历史学家之间缺乏共识,也没有关于美国如何以及为何将大麻定为犯罪的清晰明了的解释。本文试图填补这一空白。在1930年代,联邦麻醉药品局(现为毒品管制局的前身)和赫斯特出版公司将大麻的使用归类为暴力诱因,制造精神错乱的“青年刺客”。因此,“冷藏箱”是大麻香烟的俗语,因此与“疯狂”有关。本文为读者提供了比以前更全面的《大麻税法》解释。它审查了该法案的通过及其在社会背景下的执行情况,以及流行文化和大麻使用历史研究的范围。它发展并提出了关于“大麻管制税法”为何成为法律的新理论,即社会控制假说。在分析1930年代时代的爵士音乐和反大麻电影在通过和执行《大麻税法》方面的作用方面具有独特性。历史分析扩展到包括对大麻的非刑事化,合法化和医疗化相关但又截然不同的问题的深入检查。通过比较美国和荷兰(荷兰)的大麻使用已被取消合法性的毒品使用数据,这项研究从经验上检验并驳斥了“垫脚石假设”(也称为“网关理论”),该假设声称大麻引导使用者服用可卡因和海洛因。通过研究“美国无毒品伙伴关系”的反大麻媒体运动,“冷藏柜疯狂社会学”沿袭了冷藏柜疯狂直到今天的踪迹。因此,从两个方面证明了这一点:医用大麻问题和反大麻媒体宣传,Reefer Madness在1990年代还活得很好。关于“冷藏柜疯狂的社会学:美国大麻的刑事定罪”的广泛研究。是在华盛顿特区的国会图书馆以及华盛顿特区和马里兰州苏特兰的国家档案馆进行的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号