首页> 外文学位 >Human upper body evolution in the Eurasian later Pleistocene.
【24h】

Human upper body evolution in the Eurasian later Pleistocene.

机译:人类的上半身进化于欧亚大陆晚更新世。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Analysis of upper body (thorax and upper limb) remains of fossil and Recent human skeletal samples was conducted to evaluate two broad perspectives on late archaic (Neandertal) versus modern human morphological contrasts in upper limb robusticity, muscularity, joint shapes and orientations, long bone diaphyseal shape and mechanical lever arm/load arm relationships. Osteometric and humeral cross sectional data were collected from samples of Neandertals, Levantine early modern humans, European Early and Late Upper Paleolithic associated modern humans, and Recent modern humans (archeological and documented samples of Euroamericans, Afroamericans, Aleuts, Pueblo Amerindians and Peruvian high-altitude populations). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, as well as univariate testing, were used to test the competing ideas that (1) morphological contrasts between groups merely reflect skeletal changes correlated with changes in overall body form (size, chest shape, robusticity and limb proportions) in a tightly integrated, functional system, versus (2) they reflect significant differences between Neandertals and early anatomically modern humans in both activity levels and behavior patterns.; The results of the confirmatory factor analysis, along with the univariate testing and exploratory factor analysis of muscularity and robusticity variables, does not support the idea that general evolution in body form accounts for the observed upper limb morphological differences between groups. There does appear to be a limited degree of concerted ("vectored") temporal reduction in all measures of upper limb robusticity from fossil to Recent humans, but this trend alone is insufficient to account for the overall observed differences in upper limb morphology between groups. In addition, based on group means of robusticity factor scores, the real difference between groups on this robusticity vector lies between Upper Paleolithic associated modern humans and (highly variable) Recent human groups, not between the Neandertals and early anatomically modern humans.; The idea that morphological contrasts reflect behavioral contrasts could not be rejected. Upper body morphological differences between groups (both fossil and Recent human groups) likely reflect the action of bony remodeling and site-specific selection overlaid atop a basic Homo sapiens upper body plan. Thus the continued use of single traits or functional trait complexes in phylogenetic and functional analyses appears warranted.
机译:分析化石的上半身(胸部和上肢)残骸,并进行了近期人体骨骼样本的评估,以评估上古肢体(尼安德特人)与现代人类形态对比在上肢健壮性,肌肉性,关节形状和方向,长骨方面的两种广泛观点骨干形状和机械杠杆臂/负载臂的关系。骨测量和肱骨横断面数据收集自尼安德特人,黎凡特早期现代人类,欧洲早期和晚期上旧石器时代相关的现代人类以及近代现代人类(欧洲,美洲,美国,阿留斯,普埃布洛,美洲印第安人和秘鲁高海拔人口)。探索性和验证性因素分析以及单变量检验用于检验以下竞争观点:(1)两组之间的形态学差异仅反映骨骼变化与整体身体形态(大小,胸部形状,健壮性和肢体比例)的变化相关。一个紧密集成的功能系统,与(2)相比,它们反映了尼安德特人和早期解剖学现代人类在活动水平和行为方式上的显着差异。确认性因素分析的结果,以及对肌肉和健壮性变量的单变量测试和探索性因素分析,并不支持这样的观点,即身体形态的总体进化解释了两组之间观察到的上肢形态差异。从化石到最近的人类,上肢强健性的所有测量指标似乎都在一定程度上协调一致地(“矢量”)暂时减少,但是仅此趋势不足以解释各组之间上肢形态的总体观察差异。另外,基于鲁棒性因子得分的组均值,在该鲁棒性向量上,各组之间的真正差异在于上旧石器时代的现代人类与(高度可变的)近代人类之间,而不是尼安德特人与早期解剖学上的现代人类之间。形态对比反映行为对比的观点是不能拒绝的。群体(化石群体和新近人类群体)之间的上半身形态差异可能反映了骨骼重塑的作用,并且在智人的上半身基本计划上覆盖了特定部位的选择。因此,有必要在系统发育和功能分析中继续使用单个性状或功能性状复合体。

著录项

  • 作者

    Churchill, Steven Emilio.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of New Mexico.;

  • 授予单位 The University of New Mexico.;
  • 学科 Anthropology Physical.; Biology Anatomy.; Paleontology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1994
  • 页码 417 p.
  • 总页数 417
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 人类学 ; 生物形态学 ; 古生物学 ;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号