首页> 外文学位 >Adventures in paradox: A study of paradoxy in Cervantes' 'Don Quixote' and the Spanish Golden Age.
【24h】

Adventures in paradox: A study of paradoxy in Cervantes' 'Don Quixote' and the Spanish Golden Age.

机译:悖论中的冒险:塞万提斯《唐吉x德》和西班牙黄金时代的悖论研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The six chapters comprising this study center on Cervantes' Don Quixote as a major innovation within the poetic and rhetorical tradition of paradoxy in the Renaissance and, in particular, the Spanish Golden Age. Chapter One discusses the main features of paradoxy in the West from antiquity to the Renaissance, paying special attention to three texts within that tradition: Plato's Parmenides, Nicholas Cusanus' Of Learned Ignorance and Erasmus' The Praise of Folly. Chapter Two examines the development of paradoxy in Spain's Renaissance, as exemplified in Fernando de Rojas, Antonio de Guevara and Pero Mexia. Falling between the Spanish Renaissance and the Spanish Baroque, Don Quixote's thoroughgoing rhetoric of paradoxy marks the infectious beginning of what Rosalie Colie dubs an "epidemic" of paradoxy that persists in later, Baroque writings of Spain. By focusing on the writings of St. John of the Cross and Francisco de Quevedo, Chapter Three contrasts Cervantes with his near contemporaries, allowing one to ascertain why his use of paradoxy merits a place apart.;Chapter Four examines a select cluster of metaliterary issues, both dramatized and thematized throughout the work, against the backdrop of the Prologue to Don Quixote, Part I. Those issues concern the complex and fluid relations between such seeming contraries as art and nature; literature and life; history and poetry; as well as author, reader and text. At once a preface and an epilogue with respect to the subsequent narrative, the Prologue of 1605 is also shown to form part of the fiction, Don Quixote.;Cervantes' dramatization of the overlap between "art" and "life" yields what is discussed, in Chapter Five, as central "paradoxes of imitation." Through a host of imitative jests that are also in earnest, Cervantes deploys and dramatizes imitatio as at once an ethical and aesthetic issue. Chapter Six focuses on "paradoxes of self-knowledge" in its analysis of the link between imitatio, self-awareness and "self-fashioning," which the narrative throws into bold relief in the episodes devoted to the encounter between Don Quixote and Don Diego de Miranda. In the same vein, the concluding remarks discuss why Cervantes' "playful" system of paradoxy is also what we may call a "committed rhetoric" that parodies, celebrates and thus invites moral reflection on the role of human discourse in the continuing creation, or cancelation, of knowledge, culture, and the self.
机译:本研究的六章围绕塞万提斯的《唐吉x德》作为文艺复兴时期尤其是西班牙黄金时代悖论的诗意和修辞传统的重大创新。第一章讨论了从上古到文艺复兴时期西方悖论的主要特征,并特别注意了该传统中的三个文本:柏拉图的《巴门尼德》,尼古拉斯·库萨努斯的《学无知》和伊拉斯mus的《愚蠢的赞美》。第二章考察了西班牙文艺复兴时期悖论的发展,以费尔南多·德·罗哈斯,安东尼奥·德·格瓦拉和佩罗·梅夏为例。唐吉x德介于西班牙文艺复兴时期和西班牙巴洛克时期之间,其彻底的悖论修辞标志着罗莎莉·科利(Rosalie Colie)认为悖论的“流行病”具有感染性的开端,这种悖论一直存在于后来的西班牙巴洛克式著作中。第三章着重于圣约翰和弗朗西斯科·德·奎维多的著作,将塞万提斯与近代同时代人进行了对比,从而使人们能够确定为何使用悖论值得一提。在《唐吉x德序言》第一部分的背景下,整个作品都经过了戏剧化和主题化处理。这些问题涉及艺术与自然等看似矛盾之间复杂而又不稳定的关系;文学与生活;历史和诗歌;以及作者,读者和文字。关于随后的叙述的序言和结尾既显示了小说《唐·吉x德》(Don Quixote)的故事,又展示了1605年的序幕。塞万提斯对“艺术”与“生活”之间重叠的戏剧化产生了讨论在第五章中,作为中心的“模仿悖论”。塞万提斯通过一系列同样认真的模仿玩笑,将模仿模仿并戏剧化,这是一个道德和美学问题。第六章在分析模仿,自我意识和“自我塑造”之间的联系时,重点关注“自我知识的悖论”,在讲述唐吉x德和唐·迭戈相遇的情节中,这种叙述大胆地缓解了这一叙事。德米兰达。同样,结束语讨论了为什么塞万提斯的“嬉戏”悖论体系也是我们所谓的“承诺修辞学”,它模仿,赞美并因此引起了对人类话语在持续创造中的作用的道德反思,或者知识,文化和自我的消亡。

著录项

  • 作者

    Presberg, Charles David.;

  • 作者单位

    Harvard University.;

  • 授予单位 Harvard University.;
  • 学科 Romance literature.;Modern literature.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1994
  • 页码 311 p.
  • 总页数 311
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号