首页> 外文学位 >Revolt against modernity: Leo Strauss, Eric Voegelin and the search for a post-liberal order.
【24h】

Revolt against modernity: Leo Strauss, Eric Voegelin and the search for a post-liberal order.

机译:反现代性:利奥·斯特劳斯(Leo Strauss),埃里克·沃格林(Eric Voegelin)以及对后自由主义秩序的追求。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In the 1950s a conservative intellectual movement emerged in the United States complete with a sense of continuity with past conservatives (provided mainly by Russell Kirk's very influential book, The Conservative Mind) and with a heightened fear of the unprecedented danger posed by the hegemony of liberals and liberal ideals. Two European emigres, both refugees from Hitler's Europe, became the philosophers for this movement. Eric Voegelin and Leo Strauss brought to the American right the concerns and fears of continental philosophers. As a result they helped place the issues of Anglo-American conservatives in a wider context--the so-called "crisis of the West."In this dissertation I examine the reaction and the response of Voegelin and Strauss to the philosophical problems of "modernity." More particularly I ask what issues, attitudes, beliefs, and objectives constituted "modernity" for these two thinkers and on what grounds did they consider these threatening to order in a "liberal" America. Moreover, in this dissertation I chart their response to what they considered the failure of the modern project. Finally, I examine their work in the context of a larger debate in America about the problems of "liberalism."By "modernity" Strauss and Voegelin meant the process by which human designs became unconnected from a normative order. All non-human paradigms of order became suspect, thereby elevating humans to the status of creators. Consequently, the traditional pursuit of philosophy--understood as the quest for universal and timeless truths--lost influence in a universe increasingly understood as unhinged from a normative order. Strauss and Voegelin, in their very different ways, considered the reawakening of the philosophical quest as the best hope for western civilization. The search for transhuman standards has the benefit of casting into doubt the dreams of ideologues who claim apodictic knowledge even as it works against those who emphasize the human freedom to create whatever order people desire. For Strauss and Voegelin, philosophy was central to long-term social and political order.
机译:在1950年代,美国出现了一场保守的知识运动,它与过去的保守主义者(主要由罗素·柯克(Russell Kirk)非常有影响力的书《保守主义思想》提供)保持一种连续感,并且更加担心自由主义者的霸权所带来的前所未有的危险。和自由主义的理想。两位都是来自希特勒欧洲的难民的欧洲酋长国成为这一运动的哲学家。埃里克·沃格林(Eric Voegelin)和里奥·斯特劳斯(Leo Strauss)使美国人意识到了大陆哲学家的担忧和恐惧。结果,他们帮助将英美保守派的问题放到了更广泛的背景下,即所谓的“西方危机”。在本文中,我考察了Voegelin和Strauss对“哲学”问题的反应和反应。现代性。”更具体地说,我问这两个思想家的什么问题,态度,信念和目标构成了“现代性”,他们以什么理由认为这些威胁会威胁到一个“自由的”美国。此外,在这篇论文中,我绘制了他们对现代项目失败的回应。最后,我在关于“自由主义”问题的美国大型辩论中考察了他们的工作。“现代性”史特劳斯和沃格林表示“人类设计”与规范秩序脱节的过程。所有非人类的秩序范式都令人怀疑,从而将人类提升为创造者的地位。因此,对哲学的传统追求-被理解为对普遍和永恒真理的追求-在越来越被理解为不受规范秩序约束的宇宙中失去了影响力。施特劳斯和弗格林以他们截然不同的方式,认为重新启动哲学探索是西方文明的最大希望。寻求超人类标准的好处是,使主张自言自语知识的思想家的梦想变得令人怀疑,尽管它对那些强调人类自由来创造人们期望的秩序的人不利。对于Strauss和Voegelin而言,哲学对于长期的社会和政治秩序至关重要。

著录项

  • 作者

    McAllister, Ted Vernon.;

  • 作者单位

    Vanderbilt University.;

  • 授予单位 Vanderbilt University.;
  • 学科 History United States.Political Science General.Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1994
  • 页码 343 p.
  • 总页数 343
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号