首页> 外文学位 >The pleasure of discernment: Marguerite de Navarre's 'Heptameron' as a literary/theological response to John Calvin's treatise, 'Against the Spiritual Libertines'.
【24h】

The pleasure of discernment: Marguerite de Navarre's 'Heptameron' as a literary/theological response to John Calvin's treatise, 'Against the Spiritual Libertines'.

机译:鉴赏的乐趣:玛格丽特·德·纳瓦拉(Marguerite de Navarre)的“庚烷”,作为对约翰·加尔文(John Calvin)的论文“反对精神解放者”的文学/神学反应。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Calvin's 1545 polemical treatise "Against the Spiritual Libertines" criticized the theology of a group of individuals who served in the court of Queen Marguerite de Navarre, sister to King Francis I. Though no document exists registering her response to Calvin, all further contact between the two ceased. This dissertation argues that the Queen's most famous literary work, the Heptameron, is in fact a veiled theological response to Calvin.;Marguerite de Navarre, a patron of humanists and reformers alike, was in conversation with a variety of intellectual and social movements, including the reformers at Meaux, the tradition of women mystics, the Florentine neoplatonists, and the querelle des femmes. All informed her theological response to Calvin, who objected to the libertines' beliefs about evil, providence, moral discernment, and hermeneutics. Nevertheless, the Queen is found to be largely in agreement with Calvin in the first three areas, though she emphasizes more than he the Spirit's work in regeneration. She accepts Calvin's belief in justification by faith, which rests on a universal anthropology of fallenness, but the doctrine's very universalism allows her to critique his appropriation of his culture's gendered virtues. She agrees with Calvin, however, on the need for moral discernment and behavior in lieu of a pantheistic determinism.;Where Marguerite de Navarre differs most from Calvin is in her view of the Spirit's role in interpretation. Rather than adopting either the medieval church's fourfold or the reformation's literal methods of interpretation, the Heptameron directs the reader to the secular literary theory of Boccaccio, who equates poetry and theology as if their subject matter is the same. In the tradition of Boccaccio and later Renaissance allegorical rhetoric, the Heptameron constructs an allegory of spiritual interpretation which, because of its various levels, can accommodate its society's divisions in order to further the goal of union with God. As a complement to the divisive prophetic message of reformers such as Calvin, the Queen's allegorical rhetoric voiced a larger truth which allowed her to defend her own theology and yet to promote the unity of church and society in a tumultuous period of European history.
机译:卡尔文(Calvin)1545年的论辩性论文《反对精神解放者》(Against the Spiritual Libertines)批评了在弗朗西斯一世国王的姐姐玛格丽特·德纳瓦拉皇后(Marguerite de Navarre)宫廷服役的一群人的神学思想。两个停止了。这篇论文认为,女王最著名的文学作品《庚烷》实际上是对加尔文的面纱神学的回应。人文主义者和改革家的拥护者玛格丽特·德·纳瓦拉正与各种各样的知识分子和社会运动进行对话,包括Meaux的改革者,女性神秘主义者的传统,佛罗伦萨的新柏拉图主义者和女性的querelle des femmes。所有人都向加尔文提出了神学上的回应,加尔文反对自由主义者对邪恶,天意,道德辨别力和诠释学的信念。尽管如此,发现女王在前三个方面与加尔文在很大程度上达成了一致,尽管她强调的不是圣灵在再生方面的工作。她接受加尔文关于信仰称义的信念,这是基于普遍的堕落人类学,但是该学说的非常普遍性允许她批评他对文化的性别美德的使用。她同意加尔文(Calvin)的观点,即道德上的洞察力和行为以代替泛神论的决定论。玛格丽特·德纳瓦拉(Marguerite de Navarre)与加尔文(Calvin)的最大不同之处在于她对圣灵在解释中的作用的看法。七面体不是采用中世纪教堂的四重奏法或改革宗派的字面解释方法,而是将读者引向博卡乔的世俗文学理论,后者将诗歌和神学等同为主题相同。在Boccaccio和后来的文艺复兴时期的寓言修辞学传统中,庚烷酮构建了一种精神诠释寓言,由于其各个层次,可以适应其社会分裂,以促进与上帝联合的目标。作为对加尔文等改革家的预言性分裂信息的补充,女王的​​寓言修辞表达了更大的真理,这使她得以捍卫自己的神学思想,却在欧洲历史动荡的时期促进了教会与社会的统一。

著录项

  • 作者

    Thysell, Carol Lynne.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Chicago.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Chicago.;
  • 学科 Religious history.;Womens studies.;Romance literature.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1995
  • 页码 219 p.
  • 总页数 219
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 宗教;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号