首页> 外文学位 >Varieties of governance: Rural-urban migration and transformed governance in rural China.
【24h】

Varieties of governance: Rural-urban migration and transformed governance in rural China.

机译:治理的多样性:中国农村向城市的迁移和治理的转变。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation investigates the varied institutional foundations of local governance in rural China with central emphasis on the role of communal structures and rural-urban migration. Instead of treating indigenously developed institutions (IDIs) and externally imposed institutions (EIIs) as competing variables as in most other contemporary research on local governance, this dissertation develops a theoretical framework exploring the interaction between the two types of institutions in sustaining local governance as well as analyzing how community structural features shape this interaction and influence their respective efficacy in sustaining local governance. With the help of a representative national survey in mainland China in 2008 and carefully selected case studies, this dissertation finds that both indigenous institutions and externally imposed institutions can uphold quality governance in local communities, as long as they can efficaciously solve the problems of collective action and accountability. Close-knit communities favor the operation of indigenous institutions; while externally imposed institutions are relatively more competent in half-open communities. However, neither of them can survive and perform effectively in atomized communities due to the lack of a minimal level of coordination among community members. As outward migration challenges rural communities in an uneven way and transforms communal structures to various extents, it is likely to observe a variety of institutional foundations sustaining local governance in Chinese villages.
机译:本文研究了中国农村地方治理的各种制度基础,重点是社区结构和城乡移民的作用。本论文没有像大多数其他当代有关地方治理的研究那样将本土发展的机构(IDI)和外部施加的机构(EII)视为竞争变量,而是建立了一个理论框架,探讨了两种类型的机构在维持地方治理方面的相互作用分析社区结构特征如何影响这种相互作用并影响其各自在维持地方治理方面的功效。借助2008年在中国大陆进行的一次全国代表性调查以及精心挑选的案例研究,本论文发现,只要土著机构和外部施加的机构能够有效解决集体行动问题,它们都可以维护地方社区的质量治理。和问责制。紧密联系的社区赞成土著机构的运作;而外部施加的机构在半开放社区中相对更有能力。但是,由于社区成员之间缺乏最低程度的协调,他们都无法在原子化社区中生存和有效运作。由于外来移民以不平衡的方式挑战农村社区,并在不同程度上改变了社区结构,因此可能会观察到各种制度基础来维持中国村庄的地方治理。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lu, Jie.;

  • 作者单位

    Duke University.;

  • 授予单位 Duke University.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 374 p.
  • 总页数 374
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:37:42

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号