首页> 外文学位 >Faculty perception of constructivist change in teaching of introductory college chemistry courses
【24h】

Faculty perception of constructivist change in teaching of introductory college chemistry courses

机译:大学化学入门课程教学中教师对建构主义变革的看法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

There has been much questioning in the chemistry education literature of the effectiveness of introductory chemistry courses, particularly pointing to the high dropout and failure rate. Studies question the effectiveness of lecturing, the most common methodology for teaching introductory chemistry. Currently there is much discussion as to use of alternative, constructivist teaching and learning models which are more consistent with scientific inquiry.;This study is a qualitative, naturalistic investigation of the perceptions of seven college chemistry professors who hold doctorates in chemistry, teach introductory chemistry and express interest in improving teaching and learning. In-depth open-ended interviews were used to gain information on their perceptions of constructivist innovations in introductory college chemistry, and opportunities for, and barriers to, changes in those directions.;The professors who expressed some constructivist views and used some constructivist methodologies, were found to not be familiar with educational theory, but rather to be guided by their understanding of the nature of scientific inquiry. They also expressed a desire to reduce or abandon lecture as inadequate, and to introduce more inquiry-based, collaborative, questioning, and writing activities that would be more consistent with the nature of chemistry. Barriers of lack of knowledge of educational theory, large class size, heavy course content, shortage of time, and cost were perceived by the professors.;The implication of the study is that professors desire changes in introductory chemistry and are ready to initiate substantial constructivist changes to provide students of chemistry with experience more consistent with the nature of chemistry. Such changes will require greater knowledge of educational theory, departmental and interdepartmental cooperation, and overcoming of barriers of course content and finances.
机译:化学教育文献中对化学入门课程的有效性提出了很多质疑,特别是指向高辍学率和失败率的人。研究对讲授的有效性提出了质疑,讲授是最基本的入门化学教学方法。当前,关于使用替代的,建构主义的教学模式与科学探究更为一致的讨论很多。这项研究是对七位持有化学博士学位,教授基础化学的大学化学教授的看法进行的定性,自然主义的研究。并表示有兴趣改善教与学。进行了不限成员名额的深度访谈,以了解他们对大学化学入门中的建构主义创新的看法,以及这些方向变化的机会和障碍。教授表达了一些建构主义的观点并使用了一些建构主义的方法,被发现对教育理论不熟悉,而是以他们对科学探究本质的理解为指导。他们还表达了减少或放弃讲座的愿望,并希望引入更多与化学性质相符的基于询问,协作,提问和写作的活动。教授们意识到缺乏教育理论知识的障碍,课程规模大,课程内容繁重,时间不足和成本不足。;研究的意义在于,教授们希望改变入门化学,并准备发起实质性的建构主义。进行更改,为化学专业的学生提供与化学性质更加一致的经验。这种变化将需要对教育理论,部门和跨部门合作有更多的了解,并克服课程内容和财务方面的障碍。

著录项

  • 作者

    Johnson, Mark Andrew.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of North Dakota.;

  • 授予单位 The University of North Dakota.;
  • 学科 Science education.;Higher education.;Curriculum development.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1996
  • 页码 125 p.
  • 总页数 125
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号