首页> 外文学位 >Labor's power and industrial performance: Automobile production regimes in the United States, Germany, and Japan.
【24h】

Labor's power and industrial performance: Automobile production regimes in the United States, Germany, and Japan.

机译:劳动力的力量和工业绩效:美国,德国和日本的汽车生产制度。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This thesis analyzes industrial relations and industrial performance in the automobile industries of the United States, Germany, and Japan from the 1950s to the early-1990s. It develops an analytic framework for comparing the production regimes of advanced capitalist countries, and a typology of production regimes based on the form and scope of labor's inclusion in corporate decision making.;Two basic types of contemporary production regimes are identified. In segregation regimes labor's redistributive interests (wages and benefits) are included in corporate decision making through collective bargaining, while its productivist interests (employment, training, skills) are not. In integration regimes labor's redistributive as well as productivist interests are included in corporate decision making, either through codetermination ("representative integration," Germany) or through lifetime employment guarantees ("incorporative integration," Japan). It is argued that the (relative) integration of capital's and labor's interests in corporate decision making facilitates the (relative) integration of their functions in production, and results in a more equitable as well as more efficient production regime.;The thesis is tested through a comparison of the institutional structures of the three regimes, as well as of quantitative indicators of substantive outcomes of these regimes for labor's fortunes (compensation and employment security) and for industrial performance (auto reliability ratings and auto balance of trade). It is shown that the auto industries of Germany and Japan have performed better than that of the United States both in terms of labor's fortunes but also in terms of industrial efficiency. This gap has narrowed since the mid-1980s, in response to the institutional reforms in the United States auto industry that have transformed it in the direction of an integration regime.
机译:本文分析了1950年代至1990年代初美国,德国和日本汽车工业的劳资关系和产业绩效。它建立了一个分析框架,用于比较先进的资本主义国家的生产制度,并根据劳动力在公司决策中的包容形式和范围来确定生产制度的类型学。确定了当代生产制度的两种基本类型。在隔离制度中,劳动力的再分配利益(工资和福利)通过集体谈判包括在公司决策中,而劳动者的生产主义利益(就业,培训,技能)则没有。在一体化制度中,通过共同决策(“代表一体化”,德国)或通过终身雇佣保证(“一体化一体化”,日本),将劳动者的再分配以及生产者利益纳入公司决策。有人认为,资本和劳动利益在公司决策中的(相对)整合有利于它们在生产中的功能的(相对)整合,并导致更公平,更有效的生产制度。比较这三种制度的体制结构,以及这些制度对劳工的命运(补偿和就业保障)和工业绩效(自动可靠性等级和自动贸易平衡)实质性结果的定量指标。结果表明,德国和日本的汽车工业在劳动财富和工业效率方面都比美国好。自从1980年代中期以来,由于美国汽车工业的体制改革使这种差距朝着一体化制度的方向转变,这种差距已经缩小。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gavroglou, Stavros P.;

  • 作者单位

    Columbia University.;

  • 授予单位 Columbia University.;
  • 学科 Political science.;Labor economics.;Labor relations.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1996
  • 页码 500 p.
  • 总页数 500
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号