首页> 外文学位 >Environmental regulation and international competitiveness: Cross-industry and cross-country analyses.
【24h】

Environmental regulation and international competitiveness: Cross-industry and cross-country analyses.

机译:环境法规和国际竞争力:跨行业和跨国分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The main purpose of this dissertation is to examine one of the hottest issues in environmental and international economic literature that deals with whether environmental regulations disadvantage a nation's trade position. The issue is not a conclusion but a hypothesis that is susceptible to empirical investigation. Thus, this thesis aims at improving on past efforts at empirical investigation by employing better models and data, and providing fresh insight into this important policy issue.;Although the dissertation focuses on the empirical study of effect of environmental regulations on trade, we explored the factors that influence the regulatory stringency and how they are related to each other as well. This theoretical work is discussed in Chapter 2. We identified a number of factors influencing regulatory stringency. They include sensitivity to pollution, industrial structure, pollution density, and so on. Of most interest is a finding that in the case of developed countries, per capita GNP may not accurately represent the regulatory stringency. This implies that using per capita GNP as a proxy for the regulatory stringency in the analysis of the relationship between environmental regulation and trade might be misleading.;In Chapter 3, we examine the hypothesis that environmental regulations of the U.S. significantly affect international competitiveness of domestic industries. We also test the hypothesis that the extent of the effect has decreased in recent years. Based on the cross-industry Heckscher-Ohlin theoretical framework, we have tested these hypotheses using panel data for U.S. manufacturing industries. Our empirical results provide the evidence that supports both hypotheses. In other words, the effect was significant in the past, but not any more.;In Chapter 4, we developed an index that can represent the regulatory stringency for 41 countries and tested the hypothesis that international competitiveness is significantly eroded by environmental regulations across countries. Our empirical test based on the Heckscher-Ohlin-Vanek model does not give strong support to the hypothesis. Notwithstanding, the results of the test suggest that polluting industries are affected by environmental regulations substantially more than non-polluting industries.
机译:本文的主要目的是研究环境和国际经济文献中最热门的问题之一,该问题涉及环境法规是否不利于一国的贸易地位。问题不是结论,而是易于进行实证研究的假设。因此,本论文旨在通过采用更好的模型和数据来改进以往的实证研究工作,并为这一重要的政策问题提供新的见解。;尽管本文着重于环境法规对贸易影响的实证研究,但我们探索了影响监管严格性的因素以及它们之间的相互关系。第2章讨论了这一理论工作。我们确定了许多影响监管严格性的因素。它们包括对污染的敏感性,产业结构,污染密度等。最令人感兴趣的发现是,就发达国家而言,人均国民生产总值可能无法准确代表监管的严格性。这意味着在分析环境法规与贸易之间的关系时,使用人均国民生产总值代替法规严格性可能会产生误导。;在第三章中,我们考察了以下假设:美国的环境法规会显着影响国内的国际竞争力。行业。我们还检验了近年来影响程度降低的假设。基于跨行业的Heckscher-Ohlin理论框架,我们使用了美国制造业的面板数据对这些假设进行了检验。我们的经验结果提供了支持这两种假设的证据。换句话说,它的影响在过去是显着的,但现在已不复存在。在第4章中,我们开发了一个可以代表41个国家/地区的监管严格性的指数,并检验了以下假设的假设:国际竞争力受到各国环境法规的严重侵蚀。我们基于Heckscher-Ohlin-Vanek模型的实证检验并未对该假设提供有力的支持。尽管如此,测试结果表明,与非污染行业相比,污染行业受环境法规的影响要大得多。

著录项

  • 作者

    Han, Ki-Ju.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.;

  • 授予单位 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.;
  • 学科 Economics Commerce-Business.;Political Science Public Administration.;Political Science International Law and Relations.;Environmental Sciences.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1996
  • 页码 139 p.
  • 总页数 139
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号