首页> 外文学位 >Financial contracts in formal and informal credit markets: A theoretical and empirical analysis.
【24h】

Financial contracts in formal and informal credit markets: A theoretical and empirical analysis.

机译:正式和非正式信贷市场中的金融合同:理论和实证分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation provides an explanation for the co-existence of formal and informal lenders in rural credit markets of developing countries. Furthermore, it justifies the complementary activities of the two lending sectors. We assume that formal lenders find it too costly to observe the output levels of borrowers. As a result, financial contracts issued by this sector are rigid in that if a borrower does not repay a certain amount, he is excluded from future loans. On the other hand, the informal lender's informational advantage allows him to disburse loans regardless of the borrower's outcome. In certain cases, his high opportunity cost of lending would prevent him from participating as a primary lender. He can still participate as a residual lender, disbursing loans to borrowers who have been excluded by the formal sector. We then relate the possible outcomes to a set of village-level variables and find that the presence of moneylenders significantly increases the lending space.The empirical section attempts to test two different implications of the theoretical work: one, on the presence of informal lenders and two, on the role of informal lenders. The theory predicts that in villages with high income variation formal lenders should not exist alone. It also predicts that if informal lenders serve a residual role, then repayments to formal lenders should not fluctuate with income. For this purpose, we use two different data sets: cross-section and longitudinal sets from India. The results support the hypothesis that villages with high income variation are associated with higher share of informal lenders. Also, repayments to banks indicate that informal lenders serve an important role as residual lenders.
机译:本文为发展中国家农村信贷市场中正规和非正式贷方的并存提供了解释。此外,它证明了两个贷款部门的互补活动是合理的。我们假设正式的贷方发现观察借款人的产出水平成本太高。结果,该部门签发的金融合同很严格,因为如果借款人不偿还一定数额,那么他将被排除在未来的贷款之外。另一方面,非正式贷方的信息优势使其无论借款人的结果如何都可以发放贷款。在某些情况下,他较高的借贷机会成本将阻止他作为主要贷方参加。他仍然可以作为剩余贷方参加,向正规部门排除的借款人发放贷款。然后,我们将可能的结果与一系列村级变量相关联,发现放贷者的存在显着增加了借贷空间。实证部分试图检验理论工作的两个不同含义:一个是关于非正式贷方的存在,另一个是关于非正式借贷者的存在。第二,关于非正式贷方的作用。该理论预测,在收入差异较大的村庄中,正式贷款人不应单独存在。它还预测,如果非正式贷方发挥剩余作用,那么正规贷方的还款额将不会随收入而波动。为此,我们使用两个不同的数据集:印度的横截面和纵向数据集。结果支持以下假设:收入差异大的村庄与非正式贷方的较高份额相关。另外,偿还银行的款项表明,非正式贷方作为剩余贷方发挥着重要作用。

著录项

  • 作者

    Varghese, Adel.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Pennsylvania.;

  • 授予单位 University of Pennsylvania.;
  • 学科 Economics General.Economics Finance.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1996
  • 页码 144 p.
  • 总页数 144
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号